Assessing the dominance behavioral system in early childhood using observational methods
More details
Hide details
Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, United States
Concordia University of Edmonton, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States
Jennifer N. Mullen   

Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
Submission date: 2022-01-27
Final revision date: 2022-10-18
Acceptance date: 2022-11-21
Online publication date: 2023-01-16
The dominance behavioral system (DBS) is a biologically based system that underpins individual differences in motivation for dominance and power. However, little is known about the DBS in childhood. In order to make strong claims about the DBS’s trait-like properties and predictive validity, a clearer understanding of its early development is required.

Participants and procedure:
In a pilot study aimed at developing a behavioral coding system for dominance, a key facet of the DBS, we collected and coded observational data from 58 children, assessed at ages 3 and 5-6. These data were examined in conjunction with measures of child temperament via observational measures, and symptoms of psychopathology.

Dominance was moderately stable in early childhood to a degree comparable to other early child temperament traits. Con-sistent with the study hypotheses, boys were more dominant than girls, and dominance was negatively associated with children’s behavioral inhibition, effortful control, and internalizing symptoms.

These results provide initial support for the validity and developmental sensitivity of an objective coding system for assessing facets of the DBS in early childhood. Ultimately, the use of this coding system will facilitate future studies of how early DBS predicts psychological adjustment later in life.

Achenback, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. University of Ver-mont Research Centre for Children, Youth and Families.
Allan, S., & Gilbert, P. (1997). Submissive behavior and psychopathology. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36, 467–488.
Benenson, J. F. (1993). Greater preference among females than males for dyadic interaction in early childhood. Child Development, 64, 544–555.
Bugental, D. B. (2000). Acquisition of the algorithms of social life: a domain-based approach. Psychological Bulle-tin, 126, 187–219.
Bradlee, P. M., & Emmons, R. A. (1992). Locating narcissism within the interpersonal circumplex and the five-factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 821–830.
Breil, S. M., Geukes, K., Wilson, R. E., Nestler, S., Vazire, S., Back, M. D., & Donnellan, M. B. (2019). Zooming into real-life extraversion: How personality and situation shape sociability in social interactions. Collabra Psycho-logy, 5, 7.
Buhrmester, D., & Furman, W. (1990). Perceptions of sibling relationships during middle childhood and adole-scence. Child Development, 61, 1387–1398.
Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1980). The frequency concept of disposition: Dominance and prototypically domi-nant acts. Journal of Personality, 48, 379–392.
Castilho, P., Pinto-Gouveia, J., Amaral, V., & Duarte, J. (2014). Recall of threat and submissiveness in childhood and psychopathology: The mediator effect of self-criticism. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 21, 73–81.
Charlesworth, W. R., & Dzur, C. (1987). Gender comparisons of preschoolers’ behavior and resource utilization in group problem solving. Child Development, 58, 191–200.
Cohen, D., Nisbett, R. E., Bowdle, B. F., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of hon-or: an “experimental ethnography”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 945–960.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Pub-lishers.
Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Ro-bust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test: PPVT-4. Manual. Pearson Clinical Assess-ment.
Durbin, C. E., Hayden, E. P., Klein, D. N., & Olino, T. M. (2007). Stability of laboratory-assessed temperamental emotionality traits from ages 3 to 7. Emotion, 7, 388–399.
Egeland, B., Weinfield, N., Hiester, M., Lawrence, C., Pierce, S., Chippendale, K., & Powell, J. (1995). Teaching tasks administration and scoring manual. University of Minnesota.
Faith, M. A., Elledge, L. C., Newgent, R. A., & Cavell, T. A. (2015). Conflict and dominance between siblings as pre-dictors of children’s peer victimization. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 3623–3635.
Foels, R., & Reid, L. D. (2010). Gender differences in social dominance orientation: The role of cognitive complexi-ty. Sex Roles, 62, 684–692.
Fox, N. A., & Pine, D. S. (2012). Temperament and the emergence of anxiety disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 51, 125–128.
Galili, L., Amir, O., & Gilboa-Schechtman, E. (2013). Acoustic properties of dominance and request utterances in social anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 32, 651–673.
Gartstein, M. A., & Marmion, J. (2008). Fear and positive affectivity in infancy: Convergence/discrepancy between parent-report and laboratory-based indicators. Infant Behavior and Development, 31, 227–238.
Gilbert, P. (2000). The relationship of shame, social anxiety and depression: The role of the evaluation of social rank. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy: An International Journal of Theory & Practice, 7, 174–189.<174::AID-CPP236>3.0.CO;2-U.
Gilbert, P. (2016). Depression: The evolution of powerlessness. Routledge.
Gilbert, P., Allan, S., Brough, S., Melley, S., & Miles, J. N. V. (2002). Relationship of anhedonia and anxiety to social rank, defeat and entrapment. Journal of Affective Disorders, 71, 141–151.
Goldsmith, H. H., Buss, A. H., Plomin, R., Rothbart, M. K., Thomas, A., Chess, S., Hinde, R. A., & McCall, R. B. (1987). Roundtable: What is temperament? Four approaches. Child Development, 58, 505–529.
Goldsmith, H. H., Reilly, J., Lemery, K. S., Longley, S., & Prescott, A. (1995). Laboratory temperament assessment battery: Preschool version. Unpublished manuscript.
Hall, J. R., Benning, S. D., & Patrick, C. J. (2004). Criterion-related validity of the three-factor model of psychopa-thy: Personality, behavior, and adaptive functioning. Assessment, 11, 4–16.
Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: a strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Develop-mental Review, 19, 97–132.
Hawley, P. H. (2002). Social dominance and prosocial and coercive strategies of resource control in preschoolers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 167–176.
Hawley, P. H., & Little, T. D. (1999). On winning some and losing some: a social relations approach to social domi-nance in toddlers. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 185–214.
Hayden, E. P., Durbin, C. E., Klein, D. N, & Olino, T. M. (2010). Maternal personality influences the relationship between maternal reports and laboratory measures of child temperament. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 586–593.
Hayden, E. P., Klein, D. N., & Durbin, C. E. (2005). Parent reports and laboratory assessments of child tempera-ment: a comparison of their associations with risk for depression and externalizing disorders. Journal of Psy-chopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27, 89–100.
Jackson, D. J., Stillman, J. A., Burke, S., & Englert, P. (2007). Self versus assessor ratings and their classification in assessment centres: Profiling the self-rater. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 36, 93–99.
Johnson, S. L., Leedom, L. J., & Muhtadie, L. (2012). The dominance behavioral system and psychopathology: Evidence from self-report, observational, and biological studies. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 692–743.
Kochanska, G., Lee Clark, A., & Goldman, M. S. (1997). Implications of mothers’ personality for their parenting and their young children’s developmental outcomes. Journal of Personality, 65, 387–420.
Kochanska, G., Murray, K., & Coy, K. C. (1997). Inhibitory control as a contributor to conscience in childhood: From toddler to early school age. Child Development, 68, 263–277.
Kochanska, G., Murray, K. T., & Harlan, E. T. (2000). Effortful control in early childhood: Continuity and change, antecedents, and implications for social development. Developmental Psychology, 36, 220–232.
Kochanska, G., Murray, K., Jacques, T. Y., Koenig, A. L., & Vandegeest, K. A. (1996). Inhibitory control in young children and its role in emerging internalization. Child Development, 67, 490–507.
Kotelnikova, Y., Mackrell, S. V., Jordan, P. L., & Hayden, E. P. (2015). Longitudinal associations between reactive and regulatory temperament traits and depressive symptoms in middle childhood. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44, 775–786.
Krueger, R. F., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Silva, P. A., & McGee, R. (1996). Personality traits are differentially linked to mental disorders: a multitrait-multidiagnosis study of an adolescent birth cohort. Journal of Abnormal Psy-chology, 105, 299–312.
Kryski, K. R., Smith, H. J., Sheikh, H. I., Singh, S. M., & Hayden, E. P. (2011). Assessing stress reactivity indexed via salivary cortisol in preschool-aged children. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36, 1127–1136.
Liu, P., Kryski, K. R., Smith, H. J., Joanisse, M. F., & Hayden, E. P. (2020). Transactional relations between early child temperament, structured parenting, and child outcomes: a three-wave longitudinal study. Development and Psychopathology, 32, 923–933.
Liu, P., Kryski, K. R., Smith, H. J., Kotelnikova, Y., Singh, S., & Hayden, E. P. (2021). Dynamic relationships be-tween children’s higher‐order regulation and lower‐order reactivity predict development of attention prob-lems. Social Development, 30, 274–292.
Martin, C. L., & Fabes, R. A. (2001). The stability and consequences of young children’s same-sex peer interac-tions. Developmental Psychology, 37, 431–446.
Neppl, T. K., & Murray, A. D. (1997). Social dominance and play patterns among preschoolers: Gender compari-sons. Sex Roles, 36, 381–393.
Olino, T. M., Durbin, C. E., Klein, D. N., Hayden, E. P., & Dyson, M. W. (2013). Gender differences in young chil-dren’s temperament traits: Comparisons across observational and parent‐report methods. Journal of Personal-ity, 81, 119–129.
Ostrov, J. M., & Bishop, C. M. (2008). Preschoolers’ aggression and parent–child conflict: a multi-informant and multimethod study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99, 309–322.
Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259–280.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: a personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: a quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25.
Shaver, P. R., Segev, M., & Mikulincer, M. (2011). A behavioral systems perspective on power and aggression. In P. R. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes, manifestations, and consequences (pp. 71–87). American Psychological Association.
Shiner, R. L. (1998). How shall we speak of children’s personalities in middle childhood? A preliminary taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 308–332.
Shiner, R., & Caspi, A. (2012). Temperament and the development of personality traits, adaptations and narra-tives. In M. Zenter & R. Shiner (Eds.), Handbook of temperament (pp. 497–516). Guilford Press.
Stanton, K. (2017). The dominance behavioral system: Explicating its psychopathological structure and personality relations [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Notre Dame.
Statistics Canada (2022). Annual demographic estimates: Subprovincial areas, July 1, 2021. Retrieved from
Strayer, F. F., & Strayer, J. (1976). An ethological analysis of social agonism and dominance relations among pre-school children. Child Development, 47, 980–989.
Swallow, S. R., & Kuiper, N. A. (1988). Social comparison and negative self-evaluations: an application to depres-sion. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 55–76.
Tang‐Smith, E., Johnson, S. L., & Chen, S. (2015). The dominance behavioral system: a multidimensional transdi-agnostic approach. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 88, 394–411.
Tharp, J. A., Johnson, S. L., & Dev, A. (2021). Transdiagnostic approach to the dominance behavioral system. Per-sonality and Individual Differences, 176, 110778.
Vohs, K. D., & Ciarocco, N. J. (2004). Interpersonal functioning requires self-regulation. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 392–407). Guilford Press.
Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412.
Wiggins, J. S., Trapnell, P., & Phillips, N. (1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the Revised Inter-personal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 517–530.
Witt, E. A., Donnellan, M. B., Blonigen, D. M., Krueger, R. F., & Conger, R. D. (2009). Assessment of fearless domi-nance and impulsive antisociality via normal personality measures: Convergent validity, criterion validity, and developmental change. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 265–276.
Zuroff, D. C., Fournier, M. A., Patall, E. A., & Leybman, M. J. (2010). Steps toward an evolutionary personality psychology: Individual differences in the social rank domain. Canadian Psychology, 51, 58–66.
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.