RESEARCH PAPER
The Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2 in a Polish sample: psychometric validation
and relationship with specific Internet-related disorders and psychosocial functioning
| 1 | Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland |
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Julia M. Balcerowska
Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
Submission date: 2021-11-15
Final revision date: 2022-06-29
Acceptance date: 2022-07-04
Online publication date: 2022-12-01
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
the role of personality in interpersonal relations and social behaviorspersonality and behavior dynamics
ABSTRACT
Background:
The present study aimed to adapt and psychometrically validate the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2 (GPIUS2) based on the cognitive-behavioral model of problematic Internet use. Furthermore, the study aimed to ex-amine the relationship between problematic Internet use and other specific Internet-related disorders (i.e., social networking sites addiction, Facebook addiction, and problematic pornography use), as well as the relationships with indicators of poor psychosocial functioning.
Participants and procedure:
GPIUS2 was administered to 1155 young Internet users. Participants completed a survey assessing problematic In-ternet use, specific Internet related-disorders, and indicators of poor psychosocial functioning (anxious and avoidant attachment, social anxiety, and loneliness) via two measuring contexts (online and offline).
Results:
The results support a four-factor internal structure of the GPIUS2, similar to that initially proposed and the results of the previous studies. GPIUS2 demonstrated good reliability as well as scalar invariance across online and offline measured contexts.
Conclusions:
Problematic Internet use is a multidimensional construct rather than a one-dimensional construct with strong but not overlapping positive relations with the other specific Internet-related disorders. Those relationships are especial-ly strong among problematic activities related to the social context of Internet use. Furthermore, our findings prove the theoretical assumptions that psychosocial problems and poor social skills are related to problematic Internet use.
The present study aimed to adapt and psychometrically validate the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2 (GPIUS2) based on the cognitive-behavioral model of problematic Internet use. Furthermore, the study aimed to ex-amine the relationship between problematic Internet use and other specific Internet-related disorders (i.e., social networking sites addiction, Facebook addiction, and problematic pornography use), as well as the relationships with indicators of poor psychosocial functioning.
Participants and procedure:
GPIUS2 was administered to 1155 young Internet users. Participants completed a survey assessing problematic In-ternet use, specific Internet related-disorders, and indicators of poor psychosocial functioning (anxious and avoidant attachment, social anxiety, and loneliness) via two measuring contexts (online and offline).
Results:
The results support a four-factor internal structure of the GPIUS2, similar to that initially proposed and the results of the previous studies. GPIUS2 demonstrated good reliability as well as scalar invariance across online and offline measured contexts.
Conclusions:
Problematic Internet use is a multidimensional construct rather than a one-dimensional construct with strong but not overlapping positive relations with the other specific Internet-related disorders. Those relationships are especial-ly strong among problematic activities related to the social context of Internet use. Furthermore, our findings prove the theoretical assumptions that psychosocial problems and poor social skills are related to problematic Internet use.
REFERENCES (69)
1.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recom-mended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2....
2.
Andreassen, C. S., Billieux, J., Griffiths, M. D., Kuss, D. J., Demetrovics, Z., Mazzoni, E., & Pallesen, S. (2016). The rela-tionship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: a large-scale cross-sectional study. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 30, 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb000....
3.
Andreassen, C. S., Torsheim, T., Brunborg, G. S., & Pallesen, S. (2012). Development of a Facebook addiction scale. Psychological Reports, 110, 501–517. https://doi.org/10.2466/02.09.....
4.
Assunção, R. S., & Matos, P. M. (2017). The Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2: Validation and test of the model to Facebook use. Journal of Adolescence, 54, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adol....
5.
Atroszko, P. A., Balcerowska, J. M., Bereznowski, P., Biernatowska, A., Pallesen, S., & Andreassen, C. S. (2018). Facebook addiction among Polish undergraduate students: Validity of measurement and rela-tionship with personality and well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.....
6.
Awan, H. A., Aamir, A., Diwan, M. N., Ullah, I., Pereira-Sanchez, V., Ramalho, R., Orsolini, L., de Filippis, R., Ojeahere, M. I., Ransing, R., Vadsaria, A. K., & Virani, S. (2021). Internet and pornography use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Presumed impact and what can be done. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 623508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.....
7.
Balcerowska, J. M., Bereznowski, P., Biernatowska, A., Atroszko, P. A., Pallesen, S., & Andreassen, C. S. (2022). Is it meaningful to distinguish between Facebook addiction and social networking sites addic-tion? Psychometric analysis of Facebook addiction and social networking sites addiction scales. Current Psychology, 41, 949–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144....
8.
Barke, A., Nyenhuis, N., & Kröner-Herwig, B. (2014). The German version of the Generalized Pathological Internet Use Scale 2: a validation study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 474–482. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.....
9.
Biernatowska, A. (2018) Polish adaptation of the Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale (PPCS) [Un-published master’s thesis]. University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
10.
Biolcati, R., Mancini, G., Pupi, V., & Mugheddu, V. (2018). Facebook addiction: Onset predictors. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 7, 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm706....
11.
Bőthe, B., Tóth-Király, I., Zsila, Á., Griffiths, M. D., Demetrovics, Z., & Orosz, G. (2018). The development of the Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale (PPCS). The Journal of Sex Research, 55, 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/002244....
12.
Brailovskaia, J., Rohmann, E., Bierhoff, H. W., & Margraf, J. (2020a). The anxious addictive narcissist: The relationship between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, anxiety symptoms and Facebook Addiction. PLoS One, 15, e0241632. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
13.
Brailovskaia, J., Schillack, H., & Margraf, J. (2020b). Tell me why are you using social media (SM)! Relation-ship between reasons for use of SM, SM flow, daily stress, depression, anxiety, and addictive SM use – an exploratory investigation of young adults in Germany. Computers in Human Behavior, 113, 106511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.....
14.
Brailovskaia, J., Stirnberg, J., Rozgonjuk, D., Margraf, J., & Elhai, J. D. (2021). From low sense of control to problematic smartphone use severity during COVID-19 outbreak: The mediating role of fear of missing out and the moderating role of repetitive negative thinking. PLoS One, 16, e0261023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
15.
Brand, M., Young, K. S., Laier, C., Wölfling, K., & Potenza, M. N. (2016). Integrating psychological and neuro-biological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: an Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Re-views, 71, 252–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.or....
16.
Caplan, S. E. (2002). Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 553–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-....
17.
Caplan, S. E. (2006). A social skill account of problematic Internet use. Journal of Communication, 55, 721–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460....
18.
Caplan, S. E. (2010). Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: a two-step ap-proach. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1089–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.....
19.
Casale, S., Primi, C., & Fioravanti, G. (2015). Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2: Update on the psychometric properties among Italian young adults. In G. Riva, B. K. Wiederhold, & P. Cipresso (Eds.), The psychology of social networking: Identity and relationships in online communities (pp. 202–216). De Gruyter Open.
20.
Champely, S. (2020). Basic functions for power analysis. R package (Version 1.3-0) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web....
21.
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equa-tion Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/107055....
22.
Chen, L., Yang, Y., Su, W., Zheng, L., Ding, C., & Potenza, M. N. (2018). The relationship between sexual sensa-tion seeking and problematic Internet pornography use: a moderated mediation model examining roles of online sexual activities and the third-person effect. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7, 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.
24.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invari-ance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328....
25.
Czerwiński, S. K., & Atroszko, P. A. (2021). A solution for factorial validity testing of three-item scales: an example of tau-equivalent strict measurement invariance of three-item loneliness scale. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144....
26.
D’Arienzo, M. C., Boursier, V., & Griffiths, M. D. (2019). Addiction to social media and attachment styles: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17, 1094–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469....
27.
Davis, R. A. (2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behav-ior, 17, 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-....
28.
Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2015). cocor: a comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of corre-lations. PLoS One, 10, e0121945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
29.
Fioravanti, G., Primi, C., & Casale, S. (2013). Psychometric evaluation of the Generalized Problematic Inter-net Use Scale 2 in an Italian sample. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 761–766. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.....
30.
Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-....
31.
Gámez-Guadix, M., Orue, I., & Calvete, E. (2013). Evaluation of the cognitive-behavioral model of generalized and problematic Internet use in Spanish adolescents. Psicothema, 25, 299–306. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicot....
32.
Gámez-Guadix, M., Villa-George, F. I., & Calvete, E. (2012). Measurement and analysis of the cognitive-behavioral model of generalized problematic Internet use among Mexican adolescents. Journal of Adoles-cence, 35, 1581–1591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adol....
33.
Griffiths, M. (2005). A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Sub-stance Use, 10, 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/146598....
34.
Gudmundsson, E. (2009). Guidelines for translating and adapting psychological instruments. Nordic Psy-chology, 61, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1027/1901-2....
35.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/107055....
36.
Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys results from two population-based studies. Research on Aging, 26, 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/016402....
37.
Jobst, L. J., Bader, M., & Moshagen, M. (2021). A tutorial on assessing statistical power and determining sam-ple size for structural equation models. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met000....
38.
Koo, K., Nyunt, G., & Wang, B. (2021). Who spends too much time online? Associated factors of Internet ad-diction among international college students in the United States. Journal of International Students, 11, 122–143. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v....
39.
Kor, A., Zilcha-Mano, S., Fogel, Y. A., Mikulincer, M., Reid, R. C., & Potenza, M. N. (2014). Psychometric devel-opment of the Problematic Pornography Use Scale. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 861–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addb....
40.
Kraus, S. W., Voon, V., & Potenza, M. N. (2016). Should compulsive sexual behavior be considered an addic-tion? Addiction, 111, 2097–2106. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13....
41.
Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
42.
Kuss, D. J., & Lopez-Fernandez, O. (2016). Internet addiction and problematic Internet use: a systematic re-view of clinical research. World Journal of Psychiatry, 6, 143–176. https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v6....
43.
Laconi, S., Kaliszewska-Czeremska, K., Tricard, N., Chabrol, H., & Kuss, D. J. (2018). The Generalized Prob-lematic Internet Use Scale-2 in a French sample: Psychometric evaluation of the theoretical model. L’Encéphale, 44, 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ence....
44.
Liebowitz, M. R. (1987). Social phobia. Modern Problems of Pharmacopsychiatry, 22, 141–173. https://doi.org/10.1159/000414....
45.
Lubiewska, K., Głogowska, K., Mickiewicz, K., Wojtynkiewicz, E., Izdebski, P., & Wiśniewski, C. (2016). Skala Experience in Close Relationships-Revised: Struktura, rzetelność oraz skrócona wersja skali w polskiej próbie [The Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised questionnaire: Factorial structure, reliability and a short version of the scale in a Polish sample]. Psychologia Rozwojowa, 21, 49–63.
47.
Machimbarrena, J. M., González-Cabrera, J., Ortega-Barón, J., Beranuy-Fargues, M., Álvarez-Bardón, A., & Tejero, B. (2019). Profiles of problematic internet use and its impact on adolescents’ health-related quality of life. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 3877. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
48.
Marci, T., Marino, C., Sacchi, C., Lan, X., & Spada, M. M. (2021). Problematic Internet use in early adolescence: The role of attachment and negative beliefs about worry. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 10, 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2....
49.
Marino, C., Vieno, A., Altoè, G., & Spada, M. M. (2017). Factorial validity of the Problematic Facebook Use Scale for adolescents and young adults. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6, 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6....
50.
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0229....
51.
Montag, C., Bey, K., Sha, P., Li, M., Chen, Y. F., Liu, W. Y., Zhu, Y. K., Li, C. B., Markett, S., Keiper, J., & Reuter, M. (2015). Is it meaningful to distinguish between generalized and specific Internet addiction? Evidence from a cross-cultural study from Germany, Sweden, Taiwan and China. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry, 7, 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.1....
52.
Pontes, H. M., Caplan, S. E., & Griffiths, M. D. (2016). Psychometric validation of the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2 in a Portuguese sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 823–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.....
53.
Prizant-Passal, S., Shechner, T., & Aderka, I. M. (2016). Social anxiety and internet use – a meta-analysis: What do we know? What are we missing? Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.....
54.
Probierz, E., Gałuszka, A. I., & Gałuszka, A. (2020). Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2: Results of validation on Polish sample. IEEE Access, 8, 117615–117622. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.
56.
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
57.
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v....
58.
Savalei, V., & Rhemtulla, M. (2013). The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66, 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044....
59.
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.9....
60.
Sela, Y., Zach, M., Amichay-Hamburger, Y., Mishali, M., & Omer, H. (2020). Family environment and prob-lematic internet use among adolescents: The mediating roles of depression and fear of missing out. Com-puters in Human Behavior, 106, 106226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.....
61.
Soh, P. C. H., Charlton, J. P., & Chew, K. W. (2014). The influence of parental and peer attachment on Internet usage motives and addiction. First Monday, 19. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19....
62.
Stevens, C., Zhang, E., Cherkerzian, S., Chen, J. A., & Liu, C. H. (2020). Problematic internet use/computer gaming among US college students: Prevalence and correlates with mental health symptoms. Depression and Anxiety, 37, 1127–1136. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.230....
63.
Starcevic, V., & Billieux, J. (2017). Does the construct of Internet addiction reflect a single entity or a spectrum of disorders? Clinical Neuropsychiatry: Journal of Treatment Evaluation, 14, 5–10.
64.
Sun, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2021). A review of theories and models applied in studies of social media addiction and implications for future research. Addictive Behaviors, 114, 106699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addb....
65.
Tokunaga, R. S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the relationships between psychosocial problems and internet habits: Synthesizing internet addiction, problematic internet use, and deficient self-regulation research. Communication Monographs, 84, 423–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/036377....
66.
Valizadeh, M., Motazedian, S., Kuchi, M. R., & Alipoor, R. (2017). Investigating the relationship between at-tachment styles and addiction severity. Bali Medical Journal, 6, 304–309. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v....
67.
Wéry, A., Canale, N., Bell, C., Duvivier, B., & Billieux, J. (2020). Problematic online sexual activities in men: The role of self‐esteem, loneliness, and social anxiety. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.1....
68.
Wróbel, W. K., Bereznowski, P., & Atroszko, P. A. (2020). Development and validation of a brief self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale [Manuscript in preparation].
69.
Wu, H., & Estabrook, R. (2016). Identification of confirmatory factor analysis models of different levels of invariance for ordered categorical outcomes. Psychometrika, 81, 1014–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336....
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.