SHORT REPORT
Analysis of the psychometric properties of the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale in a Polish adolescent sample
 
More details
Hide details
Submission date: 2017-03-21
Final revision date: 2017-07-12
Acceptance date: 2017-07-19
Online publication date: 2017-08-29
Publication date: 2018-04-18
 
Current Issues in Personality Psychology 2018;6(2):164–170
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The current study examines the psychometric properties of the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (R-UCLA): structural validity, reliability and external validity. We conducted a study on a sample of 247 high school students, all aged 16. In order to verify the hypotheses, scales measuring feelings of loneliness, shyness and self-esteem were administered. As a result of confirmatory factor analyses, it was demonstrated that the structure of the R-UCLA is three-factorial, the factors being as follows: (1) intimate others, referring to the feeling of exclusion; (2) social others, referring to the lack of closeness and support in relationships; and (3) belonging and affiliation, referring to the lack of community bonds – all of which are reliable in their measurement, as is the total score of the R-UCLA. Moreover, we demonstrated that the feeling of loneliness is positively related to shyness and negatively related to self-esteem. The obtained results support using the R-UCLA among Polish adolescents.
 
REFERENCES (20)
1.
Austin, B. A. (1983). Factorial Structure of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Psychological Reports, 53, 883–889. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1983.53.3.883.
 
2.
De Jong-Gierveld, J., & Kamphuis, F. (1985). The development of a Rasch-type loneliness scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 289–299. doi: 10.1177/014662168500900307.
 
3.
Dill, J. C., & Anderson, C. A. (1999). Loneliness, shyness, and depression: The etiology and interrelationships of everyday problems in living. In T. Joiner & J. C. Coyne (eds.), The interactional nature of depression: Advances in interpersonal approaches (pp. 93–125). Washington: American Psychological Association.
 
4.
Dzwonkowska, I. (2011). Self-compassion as moderator of the effects of global self-esteem on affective functioning of people. Psychologia Społeczna, 6, 67–80.
 
5.
Grygiel, P., Humenny, G., Rebisz, S., Świtaj, P., & Sikorska, J. (2013). Validating the Polish adaptation of the 11-Item De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 129–139. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000130.
 
6.
Hawkley, L. C., Browne, M. W., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2005). How can I connect with thee?: Let me count the ways. Psychological Science, 16, 798–804. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01617.x.
 
7.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
 
8.
Hu, Y., Jin, Y., Hu, C., & He, H. (2013). Loneliness and their relationship to explicit and implicit self-esteem. Psychology, 4, 455–458. doi: 10.4236/psych.2013.45064.
 
9.
Jackson, T., Fritch, A., Nagasaka, T., & Gunderson, J. (2002). Towards explaining the association between shyness and loneliness: A path analysis with American college students. Social Behavior and Personality, 30, 263–270. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2002.30.3.263.
 
10.
Kwiatkowska, M. M., Kwiatkowska, K., & Rogoza, R. (2016). Polish adaptation of the Revised Cheek and Buss Shyness scale and a significance of shyness in the context of personality traits and metatraits. Studia Psychologiczne, 54, 1–17. doi: 10.2478/V1067-010-0156-7.
 
11.
Kwiatkowska, M. M., & Rogoza, R. (2017). A measurement invariance investigation of the differences in shyness between adolescents and adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 331–335. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.012.
 
12.
Łaguna, M., Lachowicz-Tabaczek, K., & Dzwonkowska, I. (2007). The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Polish adaptation of the scale. Psychologia Społeczna, 2, 164–176.
 
13.
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
 
14.
Perlman, D., & Peplau, L. A. (1981). Toward a social psychology of loneliness. In S. W. Duck & R. Gilmour (eds.), Personal Relationships 3: Personal Relationships in Disorder. London: Academic Press.
 
15.
Rokach, A., & Neto, F. (2000). Causes of loneliness in adolescence: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 8, 65–80. doi: 10.1080/02673843.2000.9747842.
 
16.
Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20–40. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2.
 
17.
Russell, D. W., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472–480. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472.
 
18.
Russell, D. W., Peplau, L. A., & Ferguson, M. L. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42, 290–294. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_11.
 
19.
Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120. doi: 10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0.
 
20.
Wilson, D., Cutts, J., Lees, I., Mapungwana, S., & Maunganidze, L. (1992). Psychometric properties of the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale and two short-form measures of loneliness in Zimbabwe. Journal of Personality Assessment, 59, 72–81. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5901_7.
 
eISSN:2353-561X
ISSN:2353-4192