RESEARCH PAPER
Psychometric properties of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory for Children and Adolescents (TIPI-CA) in a Spanish sample
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Jaume I University, Castelló, Spain
 
2
Department of Psychology, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Elche, Spain
 
 
Submission date: 2023-09-21
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-03-25
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-05-07
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-07-03
 
 
Corresponding author
José A. Piqueras   

Department of Psychology, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Elche, Spain
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
The Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) is a non-commercial very brief Five-Factor Model (FFM) measure widely em-ployed in research. Its use has been extended to children and adolescents, without exploring the suitability of its employ-ment for these early ages. The present study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of an adaptation of this ques-tionnaire (the Ten-Item Personality Inventory for Children and Adolescents, TIPI-CA).

Participants and procedure:
The sample comprised 2428 children and adolescents (Mage = 12.65, SD = 2.41, 47.16% girls). The psychometric properties of the TIPI-CA were explored in terms of factor validity (including measurement invariance across gender), as well as conver-gent and divergent validities in a subsample of 800 participants (Mage = 12.50, SD = 1.96, 49.1% girls). Furthermore, criterion validity was also tested by exploring associations with prosocial behavior and psychopathological problems in another sub-sample of 618 participants (Mage = 11.97, SD = 2.70, 53.2% girls). Finally, internal consistency and temporal stability were estimated too.

Results:
The TIPI-CA presented reasonably appropriate psychometric properties, although weaker discriminant validity was found among children and adolescents compared to TIPI adult versions.

Conclusions:
The instrument emerges as a useful tool to obtain a suitable approximation of the Big Five personality trait measures when time and/or space are scarce at early and young ages.

 
REFERENCES (41)
1.
Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., Rabasca, A., & Pastorelli, C. (2003). A questionnaire for measuring the Big Five in late childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 645–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-....
 
2.
Bore, M., Laurens, K. R., Hobbs, M. J., Green, M. J., Tzoumakis, S., Harris, F., & Carr, V. J. (2020). Item response theory analysis of the Big Five Questionnaire for Children-Short Form (BFC-SF): a self-report measure of per-sonality in children aged 11-12 years. Journal of Personality Disorders, 34, 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2....
 
3.
Carrasco Ortiz, M. A, Holgado Tello, F. P., & del Barrio Granada, M. V. (2005). Dimensionalidad del cuestionario de los cinco grandes (BFQ-N) en población infantil española [Big five questionnaire dimensions in Spanish children (BFQ-C)]. Psicothema, 17, 286–291.
 
4.
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/107055....
 
5.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328....
 
6.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-E) and NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
 
7.
Czernecka, K., Fryt, J., Szczygieł, M., Torre, A. L., & Smolen, T. (2017). Many face(t)s of young people’s risk-taking: Individual and situational determinants. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 6, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2....
 
8.
Del Barrio, V., Carrasco, M. A., & Holgado, F. P. (2006). BFQ-NA. Cuestionario Big Five de personalidad para niños y adolescentes [Big Five Questionnaire of Personality for Children and Adolescents]. TEA Ediciones.
 
9.
Eisinga, R., te Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2012). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health, 58, 637–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038....
 
10.
Etkin, P., Ibáñez, M. I., Ortet, G., & Mezquita, L. (2022). Longitudinal associations between the five-factor model of personality and the bi-factor model of psychopathology: Continuity, pathoplasty and complication effects in adolescents. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 44, 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862....
 
11.
Gómez-Beneyto, M., Nolasco, A., Moncho, J., Pereyra-Zamora, P., Tamayo-Fonseca, N., Munarriz, M., Salzar, J., Tabarés-Seisdedos, R., & Girón, M. (2013). Psychometric behaviour of the Strengths and Difficulties Question-naire (SDQ) in the Spanish National Health Survey 2006. BMC Psychiatry, 13, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2....
 
12.
Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337–1345. https://doi.org/10.1097/000045....
 
13.
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-....
 
14.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional cri-teria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/107055....
 
15.
John, O. P. (2021). History, measurement, and conceptual elaboration of the Big-Five trait taxonomy: The para-digm matures. In O. P. John & R. W. Robins (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (4th ed., pp. 35–82). Guilford Press.
 
16.
Jones, S. A., Van Fossen, R. P., Thompson, W. K., Baker, F. C., Clark, D. B., & Nagel, B. J. (2022). Developmental trajectories of Big Five personality traits among adolescents and young adults: Differences by sex, alcohol use, and marijuana use. Journal of Personality, 90, 748–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.1....
 
17.
Kawamoto, T., Kubota, A. K., Sakakibara, R., Muto, S., Tonegawa, A., Komatsu, S., & Endo, T. (2021). The general factor of personality (GFP), trait emotional intelligence, and problem behaviors in Japanese teens. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid....
 
18.
Lewis, G. J., Haworth, C. M., & Plomin, R. (2014). Identical genetic influences underpin behavior problems in ado-lescence and basic traits of personality. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 865–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.1....
 
19.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-9....
 
20.
Mann, F. D., Atherton, O. E., DeYoung, C. G., Krueger, R. F., & Robins, R. W. (2020). Big five personality traits and common mental disorders within a hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology: a longitudinal study of Mexi-can-origin youth. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 129, 769. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn000....
 
21.
Marsh, H. W. (1986). Negative item bias in ratings scales for preadolescent children: a cognitive-developmental phenomenon. Developmental Psychology, 22, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1....
 
22.
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assess-ment, 22, 471-491. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00192....
 
23.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2007). Brief versions of the NEO-PI-3. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0....
 
24.
Morizot, J. (2014). Construct validity of adolescents’ self-reported big five personality traits: Importance of con-ceptual breadth and initial validation of a short measure. Assessment, 21, 580–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319....
 
25.
Muris, P., Meesters, C., & Diederen, R. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Big Five Questionnaire for Children (BFQ-C) in a Dutch sample of young adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1757–1769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid....
 
26.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2018). Mplus user’s guide. Eighth Edition. Muthen & Muthen.
 
27.
Ortet-Walker, J., Mezquita, L., Vidal-Arenas, V., Ortet, G., & Ibáñez, M. I. (2021). Development of.
 
28.
a 50-Item abridged form of the Junior Spanish Version of the NEO Questionnaire (JS NEO-A50).
 
29.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5....
 
30.
Oshio, A., Abe, S., Cutrone, P., & Gosling, S. D. (2014). Further validity of the Japanese version of the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-J). Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0....
 
31.
Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2....
 
32.
Renau, V., Oberst, U., Gosling, S., Rusiñol, J., & Chamarro, A. (2013). Translation and validation of the Ten-Item-Personality Inventory into Spanish and Catalan. Aloma: Revista de Psicologia, Ciències de l’Educació i de l’Esport, 31, 85–97.
 
33.
Romero, E., Villar, P., Gómez-Fraguela, J. A., & López-Romero, L. (2012). Measuring personality traits with ultra-short scales: a study of the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) in a Spanish sample. Personality and Individu-al Differences, 53, 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid....
 
34.
Satorra, A. (2000). Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multisample analysis of moment structures. In R. D. H. Heijmans, D. S. G. Pollock, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis (pp. 233–247). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-....
 
35.
Slobodskaya, H. R. (2007). The associations among the big five, behavioural inhibition and behavioural approach systems and child and adolescent adjustment in Russia. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 913–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid....
 
36.
Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The life outcomes of personality replication project. Psychological Science, 30, 711–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/095679....
 
37.
Storme, M., Tavani, J. L., & Myszkowski, N. (2016). Psychometric properties of the French Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI). Journal of Individual Differences, 37, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0....
 
38.
Tackett, J. L., Slobodskaya, H. R., Mar, R. A., Deal, J., Halverson, C. F., Baker, S. R., Pavlopoulos, V., & Besevegis, E. (2012). The hierarchical structure of childhood personality in five countries: Continuity from early child-hood to early adolescence. Journal of Personality, 80, 847–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467....
 
39.
Thørrisen, M. M., & Sadeghi, T. (2023). The Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI): a scoping review of versions, translations and psychometric properties. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1202953. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.....
 
40.
West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). Guilford Press.
 
41.
Zhang, Q., Hou, Z. J., Fraley, R. C., Hu, Y., Zhang, X., Zhang, J., & Guo, X. (2022). Validating the experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures Scale among Chinese children and adolescents. Journal of Person-ality Assessment, 104, 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/002238....
 
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
eISSN:2353-561X
ISSN:2353-4192
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top