RESEARCH PAPER
Prosocial competencies among adolescent siblings of the physically disabled
Submission date: 2015-06-11
Final revision date: 2015-08-22
Acceptance date: 2015-08-22
Online publication date: 2015-09-09
Publication date: 2015-12-01
Current Issues in Personality Psychology 2015;3(4):195-202
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background
The current study examined possible prosocial benefits of having a disabled sibling. Until now research has mainly focused on the negative effects of having a sibling with a disability. We hypothesized that regular and frequent interactions with a disabled person should result in an increase of positive attitude and empathy toward other people who are in a disadvantageous situation.
Participants and procedure
A sample of 208 students from public secondary schools (middle and high schools) completed the Polish version of the Prosocial Tendencies Measure (PTM) in order to assess the tendencies to prosocial behaviors in different conditions. Participants were between 13 and 18 years old. Ninety-six adolescents had a disabled sibling (group T) and 112 constituted the control group (group C).
Results
Results showed that group T generally scored higher than group C in the number of helping behaviors. Furthermore, girls scored higher than boys in anonymous prosocial behaviors. The older adolescents are more inclined to use helping behaviors both in anonymous and compliant situations than their younger colleagues.
Conclusions
Presence of disabled children in a family context may facilitate prosocial behavior in their non-disabled siblings. Older participants less frequently described themselves as prosocial in public situations. In contrast, younger adolescents reported weaker prosocial tendencies in anonymous and compliant situations. The effect of gender on prosocial tendencies was significant for public prosocial behavior, with a higher level achieved by males in this domain. Data analysis also showed significantly greater emotional and altruistic tendencies in females than in males.
The current study examined possible prosocial benefits of having a disabled sibling. Until now research has mainly focused on the negative effects of having a sibling with a disability. We hypothesized that regular and frequent interactions with a disabled person should result in an increase of positive attitude and empathy toward other people who are in a disadvantageous situation.
Participants and procedure
A sample of 208 students from public secondary schools (middle and high schools) completed the Polish version of the Prosocial Tendencies Measure (PTM) in order to assess the tendencies to prosocial behaviors in different conditions. Participants were between 13 and 18 years old. Ninety-six adolescents had a disabled sibling (group T) and 112 constituted the control group (group C).
Results
Results showed that group T generally scored higher than group C in the number of helping behaviors. Furthermore, girls scored higher than boys in anonymous prosocial behaviors. The older adolescents are more inclined to use helping behaviors both in anonymous and compliant situations than their younger colleagues.
Conclusions
Presence of disabled children in a family context may facilitate prosocial behavior in their non-disabled siblings. Older participants less frequently described themselves as prosocial in public situations. In contrast, younger adolescents reported weaker prosocial tendencies in anonymous and compliant situations. The effect of gender on prosocial tendencies was significant for public prosocial behavior, with a higher level achieved by males in this domain. Data analysis also showed significantly greater emotional and altruistic tendencies in females than in males.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Abrams, M. S. (2009). The well sibling: Challenges and possibilities. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 63, 305-317.
2.
Bat-Chava, Y., & Martin, D. (2002). Sibling relationships for deaf children: The impact of child and family characteristics. Rehabilitation Psychology, 47, 73-91.
3.
Bellin, M. H., Bentley, K. J., & Sawin, K. J. (2009). Factors associated with the psychological and behavioral adjustment of siblings of youths with spina bifida. Families, Systems, & Health, 27, 1-15.
4.
Bellin, M. H., & Rice, K. M. (2009). Individual, family, and peer factors associated with the quality of sibling relationships in families of youths with spina bifida. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 39-47.
6.
Caplan, R. (2011). Someone else can use this time more than me: Working with college students with impaired siblings. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 25, 120-131.
7.
Carlo, G., Koller, S. H., Eisenberg, N., Da Silva, M. S., & Frohlich, C. B. (1996). Across-national study on the relations among prosocial moral reasoning, gender role orientations, and prosocial behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 32, 231-240.
8.
Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviours for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 31-44.
9.
Crnic, K. A., & Leconte, J. M. (1986). Understanding sibling needs and influences. In: R. R. Fewell, & P. F. Vadasy (eds.), Families of handicapped children. Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed.
10.
Dew, A., Balandin, S., & Llewellyn, G. (2008). The Psychosocial Impact on Siblings of People with Lifelong Physical Disability: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 20, 485-507.
11.
Doherty, J. (1992). A sibling remembers. Candlelighters Childhood Cancer Foundation Quarterly Newsletter, 16, 14-16.
12.
Eagly, A. H. (2009). The His and Hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64, 644-658.
13.
Eisenberg, N., Miller, P. A., Shell, R., McNalley, S., & Shea, C. L. (1991). Prosocial development in adolescence: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 27, 849-857.
14.
Fabes, R. A., Carlo, G., Kupanoff, K., & Laible, D. (1999). Early adolescence and prosocial/moral behavior I: The role of individual processes. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 5-16.
15.
Grissom, M. O., & Borkowski, J. G. (2002). Self-efficacy in adolescents who have siblings with or without disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 107, 79-90.
16.
Hardy, S. A., & Carlo, G. (2005). Religiosity and prosocial behaviours in adolescence: the mediating role of prosocial values. Journal of Moral Education, 34, 231-249.
17.
Jones, K. B., Welsh, R. K., Glassmire, D. M., & Tavegia, B. D. (2006). Psychological functioning in siblings of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15, 753-759. Klingman, A. (2002). Children under stress of war. In: A. M. La Greca, W. K. Silverman, E. M. Vernberg, & M. C. Roberts (eds.), Helping children cope with disasters and terrorism (pp. 359-380). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
Larcan, R., & Cuzzocrea, F. (2011). Funzionamento della famiglia e sviluppo psico-sociale dei fratelli di individui con disabilità intellettive [Family functioning and psycho-social development of the brothers of individuals with intellectual disabilities]. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo, 15, 123-153.
19.
McGinley, M., & Carlo, G. (2007). Two sides of the same coin: The relations between prosocial and physically aggressive behaviours. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 337-349.
20.
Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Frias, M. D., & Tur, A. M. (2009). Are women more empathetic? A longitudinal study in adolescence. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 76-83.
21.
Meyer, D. J. (1993). Lessons learned: Cognitive coping strategies of overlooked family members. In: A. P. Turnbull, J. M. Patterson, S. K. Behr, D. L. Murphy, J. G. Marquis, & M. J. Blue-Banning (eds.), Cognitive coping, families and disability (pp. 81-93). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
22.
Midlarsky, E. (1991). Helping as coping. In: M. S. Clark (ed.), Prosocial behavior (pp. 238-264). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
23.
Pisula, E. (2007). A comparative study of stress profiles in mothers of children with autism and those of children with Down’s syndrome. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 20, 274-278.
24.
Phuphaibul, R., & Muensa, W. (1999). Negative and positive adaptive behaviors of Thai school-aged children who have a sibling with cancer. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 14, 342-348.
25.
Seligman, M., & Darling, R. B. (1997). Ordinary families; special children: A systems approach to childhood disability (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
26.
Stoneman, Z., & Brody, G. H. (1993). Sibling relations in the family context. In: Z. Stoneman, P. W. Berman (eds.), The effects of mental retardation, disability and illness (pp. 3-30). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
27.
Thompson, A. B., Curtner, M. E., & O’Rear, M. R. (1994). The psychosocial adjustment of well siblings of chronically ill children. Children’s Health Care, 23, 211-226.
28.
Whitty, M. T. (2003). Coping and defending: Age differences in maturity of defense mechanisms and coping strategies. Aging & Mental Health, 7, 123.
29.
Williams, P. D. (1997). Siblings and pediatric chronic illness: A review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 34, 312-323.
30.
Zukow-Goldring, P. (1995). Sibling caregiving. In: M. H. Bornstein (ed.), Handbook of parenting. Biology and ecology of parenting (vol. 2, pp. 177-208). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2353-561X |
| ISSN: | 2353-4192 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
