RESEARCH PAPER
The relationship between self-control and temperament: a contribution to the self-control definition debate
1
Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland
Submission date: 2018-03-20
Final revision date: 2019-01-16
Acceptance date: 2019-01-23
Online publication date: 2019-02-18
Publication date: 2019-03-01
Current Issues in Personality Psychology 2019;7(1):24-31
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Self-control, as one of the most popular research topics, requires strong definition boundaries to enable generalization of the results. There are inconsistencies between researchers in the understanding of the concept, due to the fact that self-control is a complex phenomenon that involves many psychological functions and has a strong impact on human everyday performance. This research contributes to a wider scientific debate on self-control’s theoretical framework by examining its relationship with Jan Strelau’s theory of temperament.
Participants and procedure:
One hundred sixty-four adults (95 women) were asked to fill in two paper-and-pencil questionnaires: NAS-50, measuring self-control and its five factors (goal maintenance, proactive control, initiative and persistence, inhibition and adjournment, switching and flexibility), and FCB-TI, measuring six dimensions of temperament (briskness, perseverance, sensory sensitivity, emotional reactivity, endurance, and activity).
Results:
Three FCB-TI subscales – briskness, sensory sensitivity, and low level of emotional reactivity –were found to explain 35% of NAS-50 overall score variance. Activity showed a correlation only with the switching and flexibility subscale of NAS-50. Pro-active control showed no correlation with FCB-TI scales at all.
Conclusions:
Self-control and temperament are linked, although the shared variance is too small to justify unification of these two constructs. Successful self-control is supported by briskness, sensory sensitivity, and low level of emotional reactivity.
Self-control, as one of the most popular research topics, requires strong definition boundaries to enable generalization of the results. There are inconsistencies between researchers in the understanding of the concept, due to the fact that self-control is a complex phenomenon that involves many psychological functions and has a strong impact on human everyday performance. This research contributes to a wider scientific debate on self-control’s theoretical framework by examining its relationship with Jan Strelau’s theory of temperament.
Participants and procedure:
One hundred sixty-four adults (95 women) were asked to fill in two paper-and-pencil questionnaires: NAS-50, measuring self-control and its five factors (goal maintenance, proactive control, initiative and persistence, inhibition and adjournment, switching and flexibility), and FCB-TI, measuring six dimensions of temperament (briskness, perseverance, sensory sensitivity, emotional reactivity, endurance, and activity).
Results:
Three FCB-TI subscales – briskness, sensory sensitivity, and low level of emotional reactivity –were found to explain 35% of NAS-50 overall score variance. Activity showed a correlation only with the switching and flexibility subscale of NAS-50. Pro-active control showed no correlation with FCB-TI scales at all.
Conclusions:
Self-control and temperament are linked, although the shared variance is too small to justify unification of these two constructs. Successful self-control is supported by briskness, sensory sensitivity, and low level of emotional reactivity.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Baumeister, R. F., & Tierney, J. (2011). Willpower: rediscovering the greatest human strength. New York, NY: Penguin.
2.
Bridgett, D. J., Oddi, K. B., Laake, L. M., Murdock, K. W., & Bachmann, M. N. (2013). Integrating and differen-tiating aspects of self-regulation: Effortful control, executive functioning, and links to negative affectivity. Emotion, 13, 47–63. doi: 10.1037/a0029536.
3.
Eisenberg, N. (2017). Commentary: What’s in a word (or words) on the relations among self-regulation, self-control, executive functioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk-taking, and inhibition for developmental psychopathology reflections on Nigg (2017). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 58, 384–386. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12707.
4.
Eisenberg, N., Smith, C. L., & Spinrad, T. L. (2004). Effortful control: Relations with emotion regulation, ad-justment, and socialization in childhood. In F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 263–283). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
5.
Gagne, J. R. (2017). Self-control in childhood: A synthesis of perspectives and focus on early development. Child Development Perspectives, 11, 127–132. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12223.
6.
Gruszka, A., & Owen, A. (2015). Temperamental variation in learned irrelevance in humans. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 3, 94–104.
7.
Hofmann, W., Baumeister, R. F., Förster, G., & Vohs, K. D. (2012). Everyday temptations: An experience sam-pling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1318. doi: 10.1037/a0026545.
8.
Kotabe, H. P., & Hofmann, W. (2015). On integrating the components of self-control. Perspectives on Psycho-logical Science, 10, 618–638. doi: 10.1177/1745691615593382.
9.
Kwapis, K. (2011). Temperamentalna regulacja zasobów energetycznych w zadaniach wymagających samo-kontroli [Temperamental regulation of energetic resources in tasks requiring self-control]. Studia Psycholo-giczne, 49, 23–37. doi: 10.2478/v10167-010-0033-9.
10.
Ledzińska, M., Zajenkowski, M., & Stolarski, M. (2013). Temperament i poznanie. Energetyczne i czasowe za-plecze umysłu [Temperament and cognition. Energy and temporal supplies of the mind]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
11.
Łukaszewski, W., & Marszał-Wiśniewska, M. (2006). Wytrwałość w działaniu: Wyznaczniki sytuacyjne i osobowościowe [Persistence in action. Situational and personality determinants]. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wy-dawnictwo Psychologiczne.
12.
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. I. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, New Series, 244, 933–938. doi: 10.1126/science.2658056.
13.
Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., Houts, R., Poulton, R., Rob-erts, B., Ross, S., Sears, M., Thomson, W., & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 2693–2698. doi:10.1073/pnas.1010076108.
14.
Muraven, M. (2010). Building self-control strength: practicing self-control leads to improved self-control per-formance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 465–468. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.011.
15.
Nęcka, E. (2015). Self-Control Scale AS-36: Construction and validation study. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 46, 488–497. doi: 10.1515/ppb-2015-0055.
16.
Nęcka, E., Wujcik, R., Orzechowski, J., Gruszka, A., Janik, B., Nowak, M., & Wójcik, N. (2016). NAS-50 and NAS-40: New scales for the assessment of self-control. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 47, 346–355. doi: 10.1515/ppb-2016-0041.
17.
Nigg, J. T. (2017). Annual Research Review: On the relations among self-regulation, self-control, executive func-tioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk-taking, and inhibition for developmental psycho-pathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 58, 361–383. doi: /10.1111/jcpp.12675.
18.
Oxford Dictionaries (2018). Definition of ‘self-control’ in US English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.....
19.
Rothbart, M. K., & Derryberry, D. (1981). Development of individual differences in temperament. In M. E. Lamb & A. L. Brown (Eds.), Advances in Developmental Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 37–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Erl-baum.
20.
Rothbart, M. K., Ellis, L. K., & Posner, M. I. (2004). Temperament and self-regulation. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation research: research, theory, and applications. (pp. 357–370). New York: Guilford Press.
21.
Rueda, M. R., Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2011). Attentional control and self-regulation. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 284–299). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22.
Strelau, J. (1998). Temperament: A psychological perspective. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
23.
Strelau, J., & Zawadzki, B. (1995). The Formal Characteristics of Behavior – Temperament Inventory (FCB-TI): Validity studies. European Journal of Personality, 9, 207–229.
24.
Strelau, J., & Zawadzki, B. (1997). Formalna charakterystyka zachowania – Kwestionariusz Temperamentu (FCB-TI) [Formal Characteristics of Behaviour – Temperament Inventory (FCB-TI)]. Warszawa: Pracowa-nia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.
25.
Strelau, J., & Zawadzki, B. (2012). Activity as a temperament trait. In M. Zentner & R. L. Shiner (Eds.), Handbook of Temperament (pp. 83–104). New York: Guilford Press.
26.
Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pa-thology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x.
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2353-561X |
| ISSN: | 2353-4192 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
