RESEARCH PAPER
Relations with parents and identity statuses in the relational domain in emerging adults
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2016-05-30
 
 
Final revision date: 2016-08-06
 
 
Acceptance date: 2016-08-16
 
 
Online publication date: 2016-09-12
 
 
Publication date: 2016-09-26
 
 
Current Issues in Personality Psychology 2016;4(3):146-154
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background
Emerging adulthood is a core developmental period in which individuals can develop a meaningful identity in the relational domain (with a romantic partner). The aim of the study was to examine relationships between relations with parents and identity statuses in the relational domain in emerging adults.

Participants and procedure
Participants were 266 (47.30% males) emerging adults (M = 22.50, SD = 1.73). They completed self-report measures of relations with parents and identity.

Results
More than half of the participants were in the moratorium status or were not involved in a romantic relationship (35% and 29%, respectively). Relations with parents were linked to identity statuses in the relational domain. Particularly, the perception of low autonomy given by the father was related to less mature identity statuses.

Conclusions
This study highlighted that transition from singleness to stable partnerships seems to be challenging. Therefore, it is important to examine correlates of identity statuses in this domain.
 
REFERENCES (32)
1.
Arnett, J. J. (2007). Emerging adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for? Child Development Perspectives, 1, 68–73.
 
2.
Bosma, H. A., & Kunnen, E. S. (2001). Determinants and mechanisms in ego identity development: a review and synthesis. Developmental Review, 21, 39–66.
 
3.
Crocetti, E., Avanzi, L., Hawk, S. T., Fraccaroli, F., & Meeus, W. (2014). Personal and social facets of job identity: a person-centered approach. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 281–300.
 
4.
Crocetti, E., Rubini, M., & Meeus, W. (2008). Capturing the dynamics of identity formation in various ethnic groups: Development and validation of a three-dimensional model. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 207–222.
 
5.
Crocetti, E., Scrignaro, M., Sica, L. S., & Magrin, M. E. (2012). Correlates of identity configurations: Three studies with adolescent and emerging adult cohorts. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 732–748.
 
6.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
 
7.
Fuller, W. A., & Kim, J. K. (2005). Hot deck imputation for the response model. Survey Methodology, 31, 139–149.
 
8.
Karaś, D., Kłym, M., & Cieciuch, J. (2013). Eudajmonistyczny dobrostan psychiczny a kształtowanie poczucia tożsamości w sferze edukacyjnej i zawodowej [Eudaimonic psychological well-being and identity formation in educational and occupational domains]. Psychologia Rozwojowa, 18, 87–101.
 
9.
Kins, E., & Beyers, W. (2010). Failure to launch, failure to achieve criteria for adulthood? Journal of Adolescent Research, 25, 743–777.
 
10.
Klimstra, T., Luyckx, K., Branje, S., Teppers, E., Goossens, L., & Meeus, W. (2013). Personality traits, interpersonal identity, and relationship stability: longitudinal linkages in late adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 42, 1661–1673.
 
11.
Koepke, S., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2012). Dynamics of identity development and separation-individuation in parent-child relationships during adolescence and emerging adulthood – a conceptual integration. Developmental Review, 32, 67–88.
 
12.
Kroger, J., Martinussen, M., & Marcia, J. E. (2010). Identity status change during adolescence and young adulthood: A metaanalysis. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 683–698.
 
13.
Le, B., Dove, N. L., Agnew, C. R., Korn, M. S., & Mutso, A. A. (2010). Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17, 377–390.
 
14.
Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Beyers, W. (2006). Unpacking commitment and exploration: preliminary validation of an integrative model of late adolescent identity formation. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 361–378.
 
15.
Luyckx, K., Seiffge-Krenke, I., Schwartz, S. J., Crocetti, E., & Klimstra, T. A. (2014). Identity configurations across love and work in emerging adults in romantic relationships. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 192–203.
 
16.
Mandal, E., & Latusek, A. (2014). Attachment styles and anxiety of rejecters in intimate relationships. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 2, 185–195.
 
17.
Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In: J. Adelson (ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159–187). New York: Wiley.
 
18.
Meeus, W. (1996). Studies on identity development in adolescence: an overwiev of research and some new data. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25, 569–598.
 
19.
Meeus, W., van de Schoot, R., Keijsers, L., Schwartz, S. J., & Branje, S. (2010). On the progression and stability of adolescent identity formation: A five-wave longitudinal study in early-to-middle and middle-to-late adolescence. Child Development, 81, 1565–1581.
 
20.
Michałek, J., & Rostowska, T. (2014). Personal identity among adolescents from transnational families. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 2, 30–37.
 
21.
Pilarska, A., & Suchańska, A. (2015). The identity processes and the sense of identity: interrelations and significance to the capacity for closeness. Studia Psychologiczne, 53, 87–100.
 
22.
Pittman, J. F., Kerpelman, J. L., Soto, J. B., & Adler-Baeder, F. M. (2012). Identity exploration in the dating domain: The role of attachment dimensions and parenting practices. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1485–1499.
 
23.
Plopa, M., & Połomski, P. (2010). KRR. Kwestionariusz Relacji Rodzinnych [KRR. Family Relations Questionnaire]. Warszawa: Vizja Press & IT.
 
24.
Rhoades, G. K., Kamp Dush, C. M., Atkins, D. C., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2011). Breaking up is hard to do: the impact of unmarried relationship dissolution on mental health and life satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 366–374.
 
25.
Rostowski, J. (2005). Rodzinne uwarunkowania kształtowania się tożsamości osobowej człowieka [Family determinants of the individual personal identity’s development]. Psychologia Rozwojowa, 10, 13–21.
 
26.
Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: a test of the Investment Model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.
 
27.
Scabini, E., & Manzi, C. (2011). Family Processes and Identity. In: S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (eds.), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research (vol. 1) (pp. 565–584). New York: Springer.
 
28.
Schultheiss, D. P., & Blustein, D. L. (1994). Contributions of family relationship factors to the identity formation process. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 159–166.
 
29.
Schwartz, S. J., Côté, J. E., & Arnett, J. J. (2005). Identity and agency in emerging adulthood: Two developmental routes in the individualization process. Youth & Society, 37, 201–229.
 
30.
Updegraff, K. A, McHale, S. M, Crouter, A. C., & Kupanoff, K. (2001). Parents’ involvement in adolescents’ peer relationships: a comparison of mothers’ and fathers’ roles. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 655–668.
 
31.
Watson, M. F., & Protinsky, H. O. (1988). Black adolescent identity development: effects of perceived family structure. Family Relations, 37, 288–292.
 
32.
Willemsen, E. W., & Waterman, K. K. (1991). Ego identity status and family environment: A correlational study. Psychological Reports, 69, 1203–1212.
 
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
eISSN:2353-561X
ISSN:2353-4192
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top