RESEARCH PAPER
Examining the links between self-tracking and perfectionism dimensions
More details
Hide details
1 |
University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany |
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Submission date: 2022-08-05
Final revision date: 2023-01-10
Acceptance date: 2023-01-10
Online publication date: 2023-04-14
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Self-tracking – the collection, storage, analysis, and evaluation of self-related data (e.g., on one’s diet, fitness activities, sports performance, or finances) – is a recent and widespread trend. Less is known about who engages in self-tracking. We expected perfectionism to be linked to self-tracking because performance optimization is central to this activity.
Participants and procedure:
A German convenience sample (N = 145; 64% women, mean age = 32 years) was recruited for this cross-sectional study. The sample comprised a mix of students and community participants. Participants completed an online questionnaire with scales on self-tracking (Self Quantification Scale), perfectionism (Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale with subscales striv-ing for achievement and evaluative concerns), and personality (Big Five Inventory-10).
Results:
Using a two-dimensional conceptualization of perfectionism and controlling for the Big Five, we found that striving for achievement was strongly positively related to self-tracking, whereas evaluative concerns was not significantly linked. Ap-parently, people who set high goals and want to meet high standards are more likely than others to engage in self-tracking. However, people’s engagement in self-tracking was independent of their personality.
Conclusions:
The results point to the importance of distinguishing between different perfectionism dimensions in relation to self-tracking. Future research could explore additional performance-related traits (e.g., grit) to expand the understanding of self-tracking.
REFERENCES (29)
1.
Abril, E. P. (2016). Tracking myself: Assessing the contribution of mobile technologies for self-trackers of weight, diet, or exercise. Journal of Health Communication, 21, 638–646.
https://doi.org/10.1080/108107....
2.
Balandis, O., & Straub, J. (2018). Self-Tracking als technische Selbstvermessung im Zeichen der Optimierung [Self-tracking as technical self-measurement in the name of optimization]. Psychosozial, 41, 5–15.
https://doi.org/10.30820/0171-....
3.
Barnett, G., Boduszek, D., & Willmott, D. (2021). What works to change identity? A rapid evidence assessment of interventions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51, 698–719.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.1....
4.
Boduszek, D., Debowska, A., McDermott, D., Willmott, D., & Sharratt, K. (2022). Psychopathic Personality Traits Scale–Revised (PPTS-R): Empirical investigation of construct validity and dimensionality in a forensic and non-forensic sample. Deviant Behavior, 43, 821–828.
https://doi.org/10.1080/016396....
5.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.
https://doi.org/10.1177/004912....
6.
Burgess, A. M., Frost, R. O., & DiBartolo, P. M. (2016). Development and validation of the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale–Brief. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34, 620–633.
https://doi.org/10.1177/073428....
7.
Choe, E. K., Lee, N. B., Lee, B., Pratt, W., & Kientz, J. A. (2014). Understanding quantified selfers’ practices in col-lecting and exploring personal data. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference (pp. 1143–1152). New York.
8.
Curran, T., & Hill, A. P. (2019). Perfectionism is increasing over time: a meta-analysis of birth cohort differences from 1989 to 2016. Psychological Bulletin, 145, 410–429.
https://doi.org/10.1037/bul000....
9.
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087–1101.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3....
10.
Dunn, J. G., Kono, S., Cormier, D. L., Dunn, J. C., & Rumbold, J. L. (2021). Perfectionism and grit in competitive sport. Journal of Sport Behavior, 44, 199–223.
11.
Duttweiler, S. (2016). Alltägliche (Selbst) Optimierung in neoliberalen Gesellschaften [Everyday (self) optimization in neoliberal societies]. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 66, 27–32.
12.
Findeis, C., Salfeld, B., Voigt, S., Gerisch, B., King, V., Ostern, A. R., & Rosa, H. (2021). Quantifying self-quantification: a statistical study on individual characteristics and motivations for digital self-tracking in young-and middle-aged adults in Germany. New Media & Society.
https://doi.org/10.1177/146144....
13.
Fox, S., & Duggan, M. (2013). Tracking for health. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project.
14.
Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2, 156–168.
https://doi.org/10.1177/251524....
15.
Hryniewicz, K., & Borchet, J. (2019). Reaching goals through different means: Will and cognition in the action of people with low and high action control. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 7, 274–287.
https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2....
16.
Johnson, W. (2022). What’s to come of all this tracking “who we are”? The intelligence example. Current Direc-tions in Psychological Science, 31, 96–101.
https://doi.org/10.1177/096372....
17.
Körner, R., & Schütz, A. (2023). The German standard and short authentic and hubristic pride scales: Psychomet-ric properties, validity testing, self-other agreement, and linguistic correlates. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 39, 61–72.
https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5....
18.
Kuhl, J. (1981). Motivational and functional helplessness: The moderating effect of state versus action orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 155–170.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3....
19.
Li, I., Dey, A., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 557–566). ACM.
20.
Maltseva, K., & Lutz, C. (2018). A quantum of self: a study of self-quantification and self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 102–114.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.....
21.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Struc-tural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328....
22.
Neff, G., & Nafus, D. (2016). Self-tracking. MIT Press.
23.
Paré, G., Leaver, C., & Bourget, C. (2018). Diffusion of the digital health self-tracking movement in Canada: Re-sults of a national survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20, e9388.
https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9....
24.
Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: a 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203–212.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.....
25.
Rogers, C. R. (1995). On becoming a person: a therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
26.
Smith, M. M., Sherry, S. B., Vidovic, V., Saklofske, D. H., Stoeber, J., & Benoit, A. (2019). Perfectionism and the five-factor model of personality: a meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23, 367–390.
https://doi.org/10.1177/108886....
27.
Stiglbauer, B., Weber, S., & Batinic, B. (2019). Does your health really benefit from using a self-tracking device? Evidence from a longitudinal randomized control trial. Computers in Human Behavior, 94, 131–139.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.....
28.
Stoeber, J., Stoll, O., Pescheck, E., & Otto, K. (2008). Perfectionism and achievement goals in athletes: Relations with approach and avoidance orientations in mastery and performance goals. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 102–121.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyc....
29.
Willmott, D., Ryan, S., Sherretts, N., Woodfield, R., & McDermott, D. (2018). Motivation: a critical consideration of Freud and Rogers’ seminal conceptualisations. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 49, 229–234.
https://doi.org/10.24425/11949....
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.