RESEARCH PAPER
Identity and well-being of ethnic minority and mainstream adolescents in Bulgaria
| 1 | Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Sweden |
| 2 | Department of Education, Hiroshima University, Japan |
| 3 | Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, the Netherlands |
| 4 | Gratia Christian College, Hong Kong |
| 5 | North-West University, South Africa, and University of Queensland, Australia |
Submission date: 2016-04-14
Final revision date: 2016-05-18
Acceptance date: 2016-05-27
Online publication date: 2016-12-09
Publication date: 2017-03-31
Current Issues in Personality Psychology 2017;5(1):41–52
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background
We study identity in the context of long-term sedentary groups in Eastern Europe in contrast to the frequently studied short-term immigrants in typical Western European or US American contexts. This paper provides a novel approach to youth identity in an Eastern European post-communist context for minority groups that are quite distinct from the mainstream group to advance the study of identity. Turkish-Bulgarians and Muslim-Bulgarians have been subjected to extensive assimilation campaigns, which prompted them to carefully negotiate their ethnic identity and sense of belonging.
Participants and procedure
Participants were 366 adolescents aged 16 to 18 years (M = 16.72, SD = 0.71) from South Central and South Western regions of Bulgaria. This sample included Turkish-Bulgarian (n = 145), Muslim-Bulgarian (n = 85), and (mainstream) Bulgarian (n = 136) youth who provided data on personal, ethnic, familial, and religious identity as well as psychological well-being.
Results
Turkish-Bulgarian youth scored higher on achievement, diffusion, and foreclosure but lower on moratorium and Bulgarian ethnic and familial identity than Muslim-Bulgarian and Bulgarian youth. Bulgarian mainstreamers scored significantly lower on religious identity compared to their Turkish-Bulgarian and Muslim-Bulgarian peers. Finally, Bulgarian mainstream identity significantly predicted well-being of youth from all groups, independent of their ethnic background.
Conclusions
A strong ethnic and familial identity results in beneficial psychological outcomes for youth, even in the face of adversity and assimilation.
We study identity in the context of long-term sedentary groups in Eastern Europe in contrast to the frequently studied short-term immigrants in typical Western European or US American contexts. This paper provides a novel approach to youth identity in an Eastern European post-communist context for minority groups that are quite distinct from the mainstream group to advance the study of identity. Turkish-Bulgarians and Muslim-Bulgarians have been subjected to extensive assimilation campaigns, which prompted them to carefully negotiate their ethnic identity and sense of belonging.
Participants and procedure
Participants were 366 adolescents aged 16 to 18 years (M = 16.72, SD = 0.71) from South Central and South Western regions of Bulgaria. This sample included Turkish-Bulgarian (n = 145), Muslim-Bulgarian (n = 85), and (mainstream) Bulgarian (n = 136) youth who provided data on personal, ethnic, familial, and religious identity as well as psychological well-being.
Results
Turkish-Bulgarian youth scored higher on achievement, diffusion, and foreclosure but lower on moratorium and Bulgarian ethnic and familial identity than Muslim-Bulgarian and Bulgarian youth. Bulgarian mainstreamers scored significantly lower on religious identity compared to their Turkish-Bulgarian and Muslim-Bulgarian peers. Finally, Bulgarian mainstream identity significantly predicted well-being of youth from all groups, independent of their ethnic background.
Conclusions
A strong ethnic and familial identity results in beneficial psychological outcomes for youth, even in the face of adversity and assimilation.
REFERENCES (58)
1.
Adams, G. R. (1989). The Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status: A reference manual. Unpublished manuscript. University of Guelph, Canada.
3.
Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80.
4.
Aydinli, A., & Dimitrova, R. (2015). The dark side of multiple identities among Turkish-Bulgarian and Turkish-German adolescents. Journal of Adolescence. Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.09.010.
5.
Bagger, J., Li, A., & Gutek, B. (2008). How much do you value your family and does it matter? The joint effects of family identity salience, family-interference with work, and gender. Human Relations, 6, 187–211. doi: 10.1177/0018726707087784.
6.
Bartkowski, J. P., Xu, X., & Levin, M. L. (2008). Religion and child development: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. HYPERLINK “http://www.sciencedirect.com/s...” Social Science Research, 37, 18–36.
7.
Bennion, L. D., & Adams, G. R. (1986). A revision of the extended version of the Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status: An identity instrument for use with late adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1, 183–198. doi: 10.1177/074355488612005.
8.
Berman, S. L., Weems, C. F., & Stickle, T. R. (2006). Existential anxiety in adolescents: Prevalence, structure, association with psychological symptoms and identity development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 303–310. doi: 10.1007/s10964-006-9032-y.
9.
Branch, C. W., Tayal, P., & Triplett, C. (2000). The relationship of ethnic identity and ego identity status among adolescents and young adults. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24, 777–790. doi: 10.1016/S0147-1767(00)00031-6.
10.
Cleveland, M. J., Feinberg, E., & Greenberg, M. T. (2010). Protective families in high- and low-risk environments: Implications for adolescent substance use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 114–126. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9395-y.
11.
Costigan, C. L., Koryzma, C. M., Hua, J. M., & Chance, L. J. (2010). Ethnic identity, achievement, and psychological adjustment: Examining risk and resilience among youth from immigrant Chinese families in Canada. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16, 264–273. doi: 10.1037/a0017275.
12.
Crocetti, E., Fermani, A., Pojaghi, B., & Meeus, W. (2011). Identity formation in adolescents from Italian, mixed, and migrant families. Child Youth Care Forum, 40, 7–23. doi: 10.1007/s10566-010-9112-8.
13.
Crocetti, E., Rubini, M., Luyckx, K., & Meeus, W. (2008). Identity formation in early and middle adolescents from various ethnic groups: From three dimensions to five statuses. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 983–996. doi: 10.1007/s10964-007-9222-2.
14.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
15.
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revisions to the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61, 305–314. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.305.
16.
Dimitrov, V. (2000). In search of a homogeneous nation: The assimilation of Bulgaria’s Turkish minority, 1984-1985. European Center for Minority Issues Report, Flensburg, Germany.
17.
Dimitrova, R., Aydinli, A., Chasiotis, A., Bender, M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2015). Ethnic identity and acculturation enhance well-being of Turkish-Bulgarian and Turkish-German adolescents. Social Psychology. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000230.
18.
Dimitrova, R., Chasiotis, A., Bender, M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2014a). From a collection of identities to collective identity: Evidence from mainstream and minority adolescents in Bulgaria. Cross Cultural Research, 48, 339–367. doi: 10.1177/1069397114523922.
19.
Dimitrova, R., Chasiotis, A., Bender, M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2014b). Turks in Bulgaria and the Netherlands: A comparative study of their acculturation orientations and outcomes. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 40, 76–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.01.001.
20.
Dimitrova, R., Chasiotis, A., Bender, M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2012). Ethnic identity and acculturation of Turkish-Bulgarian adolescents. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.04.005.
21.
Dimitrova, R., Chasiotis, A., Bender, M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013a). Collective identity and well-being of Roma adolescents in Bulgaria. International Journal of Psychology. doi: org/10.1080/00207594.2012.682064.
22.
Dimitrova, R., Chasiotis, A., Bender, M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013b). Collective identity of Bulgarian Roma adolescents and mothers. Journal for Youth and Adolescence, 43, 375–386. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-0043-1.
24.
Furrow, J. L., King, P. E., & White, K. (2004). Religion and positive youth development: Identity, meaning, and prosocial concerns. Applied Developmental Science, 8, 17–26. doi: 10.1207/S1532480XADS0801_3.
25.
Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Kagitcibasi, C., & Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.). (2006). Families across cultures. A 30-nation psychological study. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Ghavami, N., Fingerhut, A., Peplau, L., Grant, S. K., & Witting, M. A. (2011). Testing a model of minority identity achievement, identity affirmation, and psychological well-being among ethnic minority and sexual minority individuals. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17, 79–88. doi: 10.1037/a0022532.
27.
Halman, L. C. J. M., & Petterson, T. (2001). Religion and social capital in contemporary Europe. Results from the 1999/2000 European Values Study. In D. O. Moberg & R. L. Piedemont (eds.), Research in the social scientific study of religion (pp. 65–94). Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
28.
Kiang, L., Yip, T., & Fuligni, A. J. (2008). Multiple social identities and adjustment in young adults from ethnically diverse backgrounds. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18, 643–670.
29.
Konstantinov, Y., Alhaug, G., & Igla, B. (1991). Names of the Bulgarian Pomaks. Nordlyd: Tromso University working papers on language and linguistics.
30.
Kroger, J., & Marcia, J. E. (2011). The identity statuses: Origins, meanings, and interpretations. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 31–53). New York: Springer.
31.
Lopez, A. B., Huynh, V. W., & Fuligni, A. J. (2011). A longitudinal study of religious identity and participation during adolescence. Child Development, 82, 1297–1309. doi: 10.1111/j.1467.
32.
Lucas, R. E, Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616–628. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.616.
33.
Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., Beyers, W., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Identity statuses based upon four rather than two identity dimensions: Extending and refining Marcia’s paradigm. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 605–618. doi: 10.1007/s10964-005-8949-x.
34.
Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159–187). New York, NY: Wiley.
35.
National Statistics Institute (NSI). (2011). Census 2011. Sofia, Bulgaria: NSI Press.
36.
Nesbitt, E., & Arweck, E. (2010). Issues arising from an ethnographic investigation of the religious identity formation of young people in mixed-faith families. Fieldwork in Religion, 5, 7–30.
37.
Phinney, J. S. (1989). Stages of ethnic identity development in minority group adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 9, 34–49. doi: 10.1177/0272431689091004.
38.
Phinney, J. S. (1990). Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: Review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 499–514. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.499.
39.
Phinney, J. S., & Ong, A. D. (2007). Conceptualization and measurement of ethnic identity: Current status and future directions. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 54, 271–281. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.54.3.271.
40.
Rivas-Drake, D., Syed, M., Umaña-Taylor, A. J., Markstrom, C., French, S., Schwartz, S. J., Lee, R. M., & Ethnic and Racial Identity Study Group. (2014). Feeling good, happy, and proud: A meta-analysis of positive ethnic-racial affect and adjustment. Child Development, 85, 77–102. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12175.
41.
Schwartz, S. J., Adamson, L., Ferrer-Wreder, L., Dillon, F. R., & Berman, S. L. (2006). Identity status measurement across contexts: Variations in measurement structure and mean levels among White American, Hispanic American, and Swedish emerging adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 61–76.
42.
Schwartz, S. J., Luycks, K., & Vignoles, V. L. (2011). (eds.). Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. New York, NY: Springer.
43.
Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Weisskirch, R. S., & Rodriguez, L. (2009). The relationships of personal and ethnic identity exploration to indices of adaptive and maladaptive psychosocial functioning. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 131–144. doi: 10.1177/0165025408098018.
44.
Smith, T. B., & Silva, L. (2011). Ethnic identity and personal well-being of people of color: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58, 42–60. doi: 10.1037/a0021528.
45.
Spencer, M. B., & Markstrom-Adams, C. (1990). Identity processes among racial and ethnic minority children in America. Child Development, 61, 290–310. doi: 10.2307/1131095.
46.
Srebranov, R. (2006). Bulgarian Muslims from the Chech region and their linguistic self-identification. International Journal of Sociology of Language, 179, 131–143. doi: 10.1515/IJSL.2006.030.
47.
Streitmatter, J. (1988). Ethnicity as a mediating variable of early adolescent identity development. Journal of Adolescence, 11, 335–346. doi: 10.1016/S0140-1971(88)80033-2.
48.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (2001). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (eds.), Relations: Essential readings. Key readings in social psychology (pp. 94–109). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
49.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell.
50.
Udel, W., Donenberg, G., & Emerson, E. (2011). The impact of mental health problems and religiosity on African-American girls’ HIV-risk. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17, 217–224. doi: 10.1037/a0023243.
51.
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
Vazsonyi, A. T., & Pickeirng, L. E. (2003). The importance of family and school domains in adolescent deviance: African American and Caucasian youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 115–128. doi: 10.1023/A:1021857801554.
53.
Verkuyten, M., & Nekuee, S. (1999). Subjective well-being, discrimination and cultural conflict. Iranians living in the Netherlands. Social Indicators Research, 47, 281–306. doi: 10.1023/A:1006970410593.
54.
Verkuyten, M., & Yildiz, A. A. (2009). Muslim immigrants and religious group feelings: Self-identification and attitudes among Sunni and Alevi Turkish-Dutch. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32, 1121–1142. doi: 10.1080/01419870802379312.
55.
Wallace, J. M., Forman, T. A., Caldwell, C. H., & Willis, D. S. (2003). Religion and U.S. secondary school students: Current patterns, recent trends, and sociodemographic correlates. Youth and Society, 35, 98–125. doi: 10.1177/0044118X03254564.
56.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
57.
Watson, M. F., & Protinsky, H. (1991). Identity status of Black adolescents: An empirical investigation. Adolescence, 26, 963–966.
58.
Yap, S. C. Y., Settles, I. H., & Pratt-Hyatt, J. S. (2011). Mediators of the relationship between racial identity and life satisfaction in a community sample of African American women and men. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17, 89–97. doi: 10.1037/a0022535.
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.