RESEARCH PAPER
Trust in the source of received information as a factor related to public perception of shale gas drilling
1
Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
2
Warwick University, Coventry, United Kingdom
3
University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, USA
Submission date: 2016-08-22
Final revision date: 2016-11-15
Acceptance date: 2016-11-16
Online publication date: 2016-11-29
Publication date: 2016-12-05
Current Issues in Personality Psychology 2016;4(4):240-252
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
the role of personality in interpersonal relations and social behaviorsthe interplay of culture and personality
ABSTRACT
Three studies were carried out to examine whether trust in sources of information on technology is related to positive attitudes toward shale gas drilling. Factors we controlled for included: scientific knowledge, universalism and security as personal values, attitudes towards science, personal and group identity fusion, political views, and valence of the media information people received. We assumed hypothesis 1, that trust in the source of the information would be a significant predictor of positive attitudes toward shale gas, above and beyond other variables we controlled for (study 1). Also, we stated hypothesis 2, that trust in the source of information on technology in question would be related to more positive attitudes toward shale gas when more positive information is provided, and to more negative perception of gas drilling when less positive information is presented. Thus, we expected an interaction effect between trust and valence of information presented to participants (studies 2 and 3). Participants completed questionnaires in Poland (studies 1 and 2) and the USA (study 3). They where recruited from communities in regions where shale gas industry could potentially be developed (study 2) or has been developed (study 3). The results showed: (a) a significant relationship between trust in negative information on shale gas and negative attitudes toward extraction; (b) a significant interaction between trust and valence of information on shale gas. That is, trust in the source of information was related to more positive attitudes toward shale gas when a positive view is provided, and to more negative attitudes when undesirable information is presented.
REFERENCES (63)
1.
Angelique, H. L., & Culley, M. R. (2014). To Fukushima with love: Lessons on long-term antinuclear citizen participation from Three Mile Island. Journal of Community Psychology, 42, 209–227. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21605.
2.
Amineh, M., & Yang, G. (2009). International Comparative Social Studies, Volume 21: Globalization of Energy: China and the European Union. Boston: Brill Academic Publishers.
3.
BBVA Foundation. (2012). International study on scientific culture: Understanding of science. Bilbao: BBVA.
4.
Besta, T., Gómez, Á., & Vázquez, A. (2014). Readiness to deny group’s wrongdoing and willingness to fight for its members: the role of the Poles’ identity fusion with the country and religious group. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 2, 49‒55. doi: 10.5114/cipp.2014.43101.
5.
Besta, T., Szulc, M., & Jaśkiewicz, M. (2015). Political extremism, group membership, and personality traits: Who accepts violence? Revista de Psicología Social: International Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 563–585. doi: 10.1080/02134748.2015.1065085.
6.
Białobrzeska, O., Bocian, K., Parzuchowski, M., Frankowska, N., & Wojciszke, B. (2015). To nie fair (bo mi szkodzi): zaangażowanie interesu własnego zniekształca ocenę sprawiedliwości dystrybutywnej [It’s not fair if I don’t gain from it: Engaging self-interest distorts the assessment of distributive justice]. Psychologia Społeczna, 10, 149–162.
7.
Bjørnskov, C. (2012). How does social trust affect economic growth? Southern Economic Journal, 78, 1346–1368.
8.
Boudet, H. S. (2011). From NIMBY to NIABY: regional mobilization against liquefied natural gas in the United States. Environmental Politics, 20, 786–806.
9.
Boudet, H., Clarke, C., Bugden, D., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). “Fracking” controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy, 65, 57–67.
10.
Brasier, K. J., Filteau, M., McLaughin, D. K., Jacquet, J., Stedman, R. C., Kelsey, T. W., & Goetz, S. (2011). Residents’ perceptions of community and environmental impacts from development of natural gas in the marcellus shale: a comparison of Pennsylvania and New York cases. Journal of Rular Social Sciences, 26, 32–61.
11.
Calder, K. E. (ed.). (2012). New Continentalism: Energy and Twenty-First-Century Eurasian Geopolitics. Yale: Yale University Press.
12.
Carcasson, M. (2009). Beginning with the end in mind. New York, NY: Center for Advances in Public Engagement, Public Agenda.
13.
CBOS. (2011). Wydobywać? Polacy o gazie łupkowym [To extract? Poles on shale gas]. CBOS online. Retrieved from: http://http://www.cbos.pl/SPIS....
14.
CBOS. (2013). Społeczny stosunek do gazu łupkowego [Social attitudes toward shale gas]. CBOS online. Retrieved from: http://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL....
15.
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.
16.
Clarke, C., Hartb, P. S., Schuldtc, J. P., Evensend, D. T. N., Boudete, H. S., Jacquetf, J. B., & Stedmang, R. C. (2015). Public opinion on energy development: The interplay of issue framing, top-of-mind associations, and political ideology. Energy Policy, 81, 131–140.
17.
Cotton, M., Rattle, I., & Van Alstine, J. (2014). Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: An argumentative discourse analysis. Energy Policy, 73, 427–438.
18.
Culley, M. R., & Angelique, H. (2010). Nuclear power: Renaissance or relapse? Global climate change and long-term Three Mile Island activists’ narratives. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45, 231–246. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9299-8
.
19.
Dag, H. C. (2013). The interdependence of European–Russian energy relations. Energy Policy, 59, 784–791.
20.
Davis, J. B., & Robinson, G. R. (2012). A geographic model to assess and limit cumulative ecological degradation from Marcellus Shale exploitation in New York, USA. Ecology and Society, 17, 25.
21.
De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2007). The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 639–649.
22.
Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983-1997. A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15, 312–343.
23.
DiMentto, J. F., & Doughman, P. (eds.). (2014). Climate change: What it means for us, our children, and our grandchildren (2nd ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: MIT Press.
24.
Economist. (2011). The Future of Natural Gas. Coming Soon to a Terminal Near You. The Economist. Retrieved from: http://www.economist.com/node/....
25.
European Commission. (2007). Eurobarometr. Energy technologies, knowledge, perception, measures. European Commission Report. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opi....
26.
European Commission. (2011). EUROPE 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf....
27.
Francescato, D., & Aber, M. S. (2015). Learning from Organizational theory to Build Organizational Empowerment. Journal of Community Psychology, 43, 717–738. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21753.
29.
Gómez, A., Brooks, M. L., Buhrmester, M. D., Vázquez, A., Jetten, J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2011). On the nature of identity fusion: insights into the construct and a new measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 918–933. doi: 10.1037/a0022642.
30.
Goodwin, R., Takahashi, M., Sun, S., & Gaines, S. O., Jr. (2012). Modeling psychological responses to the great East Japan earthquake and nuclear incident. PLoS One, 7, e37690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037690.
31.
GUS. (2014). Gospodarka paliwowo-energetyczna w latach 2012-2013 [Fuel and Energy Economy in 2012-2013]. Warsaw: Główny Urząd Statystyczny [Central Statistical Office].
32.
Gwiazdowicz, M., & Stankiewicz, P. (eds.). (2015). Technology Assessment. Problematyka oceny technologii [Technology Assessment. Issues in technology evaluation]. Studia BAS, 3, 35–54.
33.
IEA. (2011a). Are we entering a golden age of gas? Special Raport. World Energy Outlook.
34.
IEA. (2011b). Energy Policies of IEA Countries 2011 Review: Poland. Retrieved from: http://www.iea.org/publication....
35.
Jackson, R. B., Pearson, B. R., Osborn, S., Warner, N. R., & Vengosh, A. (2011). Research and policy recommendations for hydraulic fracturing and shale gas extraction. Center on Global Change, Duke University, Durham, NC.
36.
Jacquet, J. B. (2012). Landowner attitudes toward natural gas and wind farm development in northern Pennsylvania. Energy Policy, 50, 677–688.
37.
Jacquet, J. B., & Stedman, R. C. (2013). Perceived impacts from wind farm and natural gas development in Northern Pennsylvania. Rural Sociology, 78(4), 450-472. doi:10.1111/ruso.12022.
38.
Jaspal, R., Nerlich, B., & Lemańczyk, S. (2014). Fracking in the Polish press: Geopolitics and national identity. Energy Policy, 74, 253–261.
39.
Kijewska, B. (2014). Problematyka energetyczna w ujęciu politycznym: Kwestie energetyczne w programach politycznych [The political aspect of energy: Energy issue in political party programmes]. Przegląd Naukowo-Metodyczny. Edukacja dla Bezpieczeństwa, 7, 927–939.
40.
Kratochvíl, P., & Tichý, L. (2013). EU and Russian discourse on energy relations. Energy Policy, 56, 391–406.
41.
Łucki, Z., & Misiak, W. (2012). Energetyka a społeczeństwo. Aspekty socjologiczne [Power engineering and society. Sociological aspects]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
42.
Makovsky Report. (2014). Fracking in the Digital Landscape. Retrieved from: http://www.makovsky.com/compon....
43.
Materka, E. (2012). Poland’s quiet revolution: The unfolding of shale gas exploration and its discontents in Pomerania. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, 6, 189–218.
44.
Mielby, H., Sandøe, P., & Lassen, J. (2013). The role of scientific knowledge in shaping public attitudes to GM technologies. Public Understanding of Science, 22, 155–168.
45.
Palinkas, L. A., Patterson, J. S., Russell, J., & Downs, M. A. (1993). Community patterns of psychiatric disorders after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 1517–1523.
46.
Pettenger, M. E. (ed.). (2007). Social Construction of Climate Change: Power, Knowledge, Norms, Discourses. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Group.
47.
Pew Research Center. (2015). How Americans view the top energy and environmental issues. Retrieved from: http://www.pewresearch.org/key....
48.
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550–562.
49.
Shahriar, S., & Erkan, T. (2009). When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished? Energy Policy, 37, 181–189.
51.
Slovic, P. (1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 13, 675–682. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01329.x.
52.
Speirs, J., McGlade, C., & Raphael, R. (2015). Uncertainty in the availability of natural resources: Fossil fuels, critical metals and biomass. Energy Policy, 87, 654–664.
53.
Stephenson, E., Doukas, A., & Shaw, K. (2012). Greenwashing gas: Might a “transition fuel” label legitimize carbon-intensive natural gas development. Energy Policy, 46, 452–459. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.010.
54.
Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 55–74.
55.
Sovacool, B. K. (2008). The costs of failure: A preliminary assessment of major energy accidents, 1907–2007. Energy Policy, 36, 1802–1820.
56.
Swann, W. B., Buhrmester, M. D., Gómez, M., Jettem, J., Bastian, B., Vázquez, A., ..., & Zhang, A. (2014). What makes a group worth dying for? Identity fusion fosters perception of familial ties, promoting self-sacrifice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 912–926. doi: 10.1037/a0036089.
57.
Swann, W. B., & Buhrmester, M. D. (2015). Identity fusion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 52–57. doi: 10.1177/0963721414551363.
58.
Swann, W. B., Jr., Gómez, A., Huici, C., Morales, J. F., & Hixon, J. G. (2010). Identity fusion and self-sacrifice: arousal as a catalyst of pro-group fighting, dying, and helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 824–841. doi: 10.1037/a0020014.
59.
Tokuda, Y., Jimba, M., Yanai, H., Fujii, S., & Inoguchi, T. (2008). Interpersonal trust and quality-of-life: A cross-sectional study in Japan. PloS One, 3, e3985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003985.
60.
Tran, T., & Daim, T. U. (2011). Technology assessment. In T. Daim, N. Gerdsri, & N. Basoglu (eds.), Technology assessment. Forecasting future adoption of emerging technologies (pp. 1–17). Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
61.
Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., & Lind, E. A. (1998). When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 75, 1449–1458. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1449.
62.
Wood, J. (2012). The global anti-fracking movement: What it wants, how it operates and what next. Control Risk Group, London. Retrieved from: http://www.marcellusprotest.or....
63.
Wolsink, M. (2000). Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support. Renewable Energy, 21, 49–64.
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2353-561X |
| ISSN: | 2353-4192 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
