RESEARCH PAPER
Predicting individuals’ behaviors during a pandemic: why we might have acted as we did during the COVID-19 pandemic
1
Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait
2
University of Texas, Arlington, United States
Submission date: 2023-05-12
Final revision date: 2023-09-29
Acceptance date: 2023-10-25
Online publication date: 2024-03-04
KEYWORDS
pandemicprevention behaviorprotective behaviorimpulsive buyinglocus of controlstate of anxietytrustperceived threatself-efficacy
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
This study examined individual differences in how people behave in response to a pandemic – more specifically, the current coronavirus pandemic.
Participants and procedure:
A sample of 420 participants was recruited through the online data collection platform MTurk. Participants were directed via an online link to a Qualtrics survey. This survey was composed of several demographic questions and self-report personality and belief scales, followed by a set of outcome measures designed to measure specific behaviors relating to avoidant behavior, protective behavior, and impulsive buying which the participants might, or might not, have engaged in during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Results:
The results showed that locus of control was the best personality-related predictor of peoples’ pandemic-relevant behavior, such that externally oriented people were more likely to report both protective behavior and impulsive buying behavior. In addition, perceived threat was significantly associated with all three types of pandemic-relevant behaviors (avoidant, protective, and impulsive buying).
Conclusions:
Individuals’ personality traits and beliefs clearly play a major role in determining their behavior during health crises. In the case of the current COVID-19 crisis, some people adopt behaviors that ensure their safety and the safety of others, whereas other people display careless behaviors that contribute to spreading the infection. Because individual differences in this situation matter, it is important to determine which variables accurately predict which behaviors.
This study examined individual differences in how people behave in response to a pandemic – more specifically, the current coronavirus pandemic.
Participants and procedure:
A sample of 420 participants was recruited through the online data collection platform MTurk. Participants were directed via an online link to a Qualtrics survey. This survey was composed of several demographic questions and self-report personality and belief scales, followed by a set of outcome measures designed to measure specific behaviors relating to avoidant behavior, protective behavior, and impulsive buying which the participants might, or might not, have engaged in during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Results:
The results showed that locus of control was the best personality-related predictor of peoples’ pandemic-relevant behavior, such that externally oriented people were more likely to report both protective behavior and impulsive buying behavior. In addition, perceived threat was significantly associated with all three types of pandemic-relevant behaviors (avoidant, protective, and impulsive buying).
Conclusions:
Individuals’ personality traits and beliefs clearly play a major role in determining their behavior during health crises. In the case of the current COVID-19 crisis, some people adopt behaviors that ensure their safety and the safety of others, whereas other people display careless behaviors that contribute to spreading the infection. Because individual differences in this situation matter, it is important to determine which variables accurately predict which behaviors.
REFERENCES (38)
1.
Addo, P. C., Jiaming, F., Kulbo, N. B., & Liangqiang, L. (2020). COVID-19: Fear appeal favoring purchase behavior towards personal protective equipment. The Service Industries Journal, 40, 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/026420....
2.
Al-Raddadi, R., Bahabri, N., & Al-Raddadi, Z. (2023). Perceived COVID-19 severity, risk of infection, and prevention self-efficacy in Saudi Arabia during lockdown: a population-based national study. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health, 13, 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197....
3.
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1963/1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Prentice Hall.
4.
Bandura, A. S. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). Academic Press.
5.
Berg, M. B., & Lin, L. (2020). Prevalence and predictors of early COVID-19 behavioral intentions in the United States. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 10, 843–849. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ib....
6.
Bish, A., & Michie, S. (2010). Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: a review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 797–824. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910....
7.
Cochrane, A., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2008). The Perceived-Threat Behavioral Approach Test (PT-BAT): Measuring avoidance in high-, mid-, and low-spider-fearful participants. The Psychological Record, 58, 585–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0339....
8.
Conway, L. G., Woodard, S. R., & Zubrod, A. (2020, April 7). Social psychological measurements of COVID-19: Coronavirus perceived threat, government response, impacts, and experiences questionnaires. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.i....
9.
Cui, B., Liao, Q., Lam, W. W. T., Liu, Z. P., & Fielding, R. (2017). Avian influenza A/H7N9 risk perception, information trust and adoption of protective behaviours among poultry farmers in Jiangsu Province, China. BMC Public Health, 17, 463. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889....
10.
Fernandes, O., Jr, Portugal, L. C., Alves, R. C., Campagnoli, R. R., Mocaiber, I., David, I. P., Erthal, F. C., Volchan, E., de Oliveira, L., & Pereira, M. G. (2013). How you perceive threat determines your behavior. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 632. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.....
11.
Fogel, J., & Azrak, M. (2023). Psychological variables related to decision making for mask wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 11, 175–181. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp/1....
12.
Gaygisiz, U., Gaygisiz, E., Ozkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2012). Individual differences in behavioral reactions to H1N1 during a later stage of the epidemic. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 5, 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph....
13.
Ihlen, Ø., Just, S. N., Kjeldsen, J. E., Mølster, R., Offerdal, T. S., Rasmussen, J., & Skogerbø, E. (2022). Transparency beyond information disclosure: Strategies of the Scandinavian public health authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Risk Research, 25, 1176–1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/136698....
14.
Itani, O. S., & Hollebeek, L. D. (2021). Consumers’ health-locus-of-control and social distancing in pandemic-based e-tailing services. Journal of Services Marketing, 35, 1073–1091. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-10....
15.
Jørgensen, F., Bor, A., & Petersen, M. B. (2021). Compliance without fear: Individual‐level protective behaviour during the first wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic. British Journal of Health Psychology, 26, 679–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.1....
16.
Lee, H., & Park, S. A. (2016). Third-person effect and pandemic flu: The role of severity, self-efficacy method mentions, and message source. Journal of Health Communication, 21, 1244–1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/108107....
17.
Manika, D., & Golden, L. L. (2011). Self-efficacy, threat, knowledge and information receptivity: Exploring pandemic prevention behaviors to enhance societal welfare. Academy of Health Care Management Journal, 7, 31–44.
18.
Marteau, T. M., & Bekker, H. (1992). The development of a six‐item short‐form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31, 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044....
19.
Mathews, A. (1990). Why worry? The cognitive function of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7....
20.
Merdin-Uygur, E. (2018). Consumer impulsive buying tendency scale development using mixed methodology. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 6, 125–141. https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m....
21.
Oniszczenko, W. (2021). The association between BIS/BAS and fear of COVID-19 infection among women. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 9, 237–245. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2....
23.
Pagliaro, S., Sacchi, S., Pacilli, M. G., Brambilla, M., Lionetti, F., Bettache, K., Bianchi, M., Biella, M., Bonnot, V., Boza, M., Butera, F., Ceylan-Batur, S., Chong, K., Chopova, T., Crimston, C. R., Álvarez, B., Cuadrado, I., Ellemers, N., Formanowicz, M., Graupmann, V., … Zubieta, E. (2021). Trust predicts COVID-19 prescribed and discretionary behavioral intentions in 23 countries. PloS One, 16, e0248334. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
24.
Phillips, R., Gillespie, D., Hallingberg, B., Evans, J., Taiyari, K., Torrens‐Burton, A., & Wood, F. (2022). Perceived threat of COVID‐19, attitudes towards vaccination, and vaccine hesitancy: a prospective longitudinal study in the UK. British Journal of Health Psychology, 27, 1354–1381. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.1....
25.
Quinn, S. C., Kumar, S., Freimuth, V. S., Kidwell, K., & Musa, D. (2009). Public willingness to take a vaccine or drug under Emergency Use Authorization during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, 7, 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1089/bsp.20....
26.
Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Psychology, 91, 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/002239....
28.
Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Education Monographs, 2, 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019....
29.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 80, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h00929....
30.
Sadique, M. Z., Edmunds, W. J., Smith, R. D., Meerding, W. J., Zwart, O., Brug, J., & Beutels, P. (2007). Precautionary behavior in response to perceived threat of pandemic influenza. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 13, 1307–1313. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid130....
31.
Shanahan, M. L., Fischer, I. C., Rogers, S. K., & Rand, K. L. (2022). Coping with COVID-19: a snapshot of college student mental health, coping, and expectancies during stay-at-home orders. Journal of American College Health, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/074484....
32.
Taylor, S. (2019). The psychology of pandemics: Preparing for the next global outbreak of infectious disease. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
33.
Taylor, S., Landry, C. A., Paluszek, M. M., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2020). Reactions to COVID-19: Differential predictors of distress, avoidance, and disregard for social distancing. Journal of Affective Disorders, 277, 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.....
34.
Ungüren, E., Ceyhan, S., & Türker, N. (2023). The impact of rumination on life satisfaction of hotel employees during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of fear of COVID-19 and the moderating role of sedentary lifestyle. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 11, 193–204. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2....
35.
Valecha, G. K., & Ostrom, T. M. (1974). An abbreviated measure of internal-external locus of control. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38, 369–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/002238....
36.
Witte, K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: a test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61, 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/036377....
37.
Wong, C. M. L., & Jensen, O. (2020). The paradox of trust: Perceived risk and public compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore. Journal of Risk Research, 23, 1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/136698....
38.
Yenew, C., Dessie, A. M., Gebeyehu, A. A., & Genet, A. (2023). Intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine and its health belief model (HBM)-based predictors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 19, 2207442. https://doi.org/10.1080/216455....
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2353-561X |
| ISSN: | 2353-4192 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
