RESEARCH PAPER
The relationship between clients’ personality traits, working alliance and therapy outcome in a training context
1
Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
Submission date: 2016-10-07
Final revision date: 2016-12-22
Acceptance date: 2016-12-28
Online publication date: 2017-01-26
Publication date: 2017-04-01
Current Issues in Personality Psychology 2017;5(2):132-142
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background
Clients’ differences in personality include both psychopathology and normal personality variations and constitute an important factor for the therapeutic process and outcome. There is a lack of empirical data on the impact of clients’ personalities on therapeutic relationships and outcomes, particularly in a training context.
Participants and procedure
This longitudinal study investigated the relationships between client personality traits, changes in those traits after cognitive behavioral or psychodynamic short-term therapy, and clients’ perceived working alliances with their therapists and their clinical outcomes at a university training clinic in Sweden. Participants were 138 clients with moderate psychological symptoms. Personality traits were measured using the Health-Relevant Personality Inventory.
Results
The results showed that Antagonism, Impulsivity, Hedonic Capacity, and Negative Affectivity improved significantly during therapy, while Alexithymia did not. Pre-therapy personality traits were not related to perceived working alliances (Working Alliance Inventory) or therapeutic outcomes (Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure). Post-therapy personality traits negative affectivity, hedonic capacity and alexithymia were related to working alliance, and changes in personality traits were predictive of therapy outcome. The change in Hedonic Capacity and Negative Affectivity explained about 20% of the variance in post-therapy symptoms after controlling for pre-therapy symptoms.
Conclusions
The results suggest that therapeutic foci on hedonism (extraversion) and negative affectivity (neuroticism) could be important for working alliance formation and symptom reduction in therapy. Future research should examine whether changes in clients’ negative affectivity or hedonic capacity mediate the relation between perceived working alliance quality and clinical outcome in training and other psychotherapeutic contexts.
Clients’ differences in personality include both psychopathology and normal personality variations and constitute an important factor for the therapeutic process and outcome. There is a lack of empirical data on the impact of clients’ personalities on therapeutic relationships and outcomes, particularly in a training context.
Participants and procedure
This longitudinal study investigated the relationships between client personality traits, changes in those traits after cognitive behavioral or psychodynamic short-term therapy, and clients’ perceived working alliances with their therapists and their clinical outcomes at a university training clinic in Sweden. Participants were 138 clients with moderate psychological symptoms. Personality traits were measured using the Health-Relevant Personality Inventory.
Results
The results showed that Antagonism, Impulsivity, Hedonic Capacity, and Negative Affectivity improved significantly during therapy, while Alexithymia did not. Pre-therapy personality traits were not related to perceived working alliances (Working Alliance Inventory) or therapeutic outcomes (Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure). Post-therapy personality traits negative affectivity, hedonic capacity and alexithymia were related to working alliance, and changes in personality traits were predictive of therapy outcome. The change in Hedonic Capacity and Negative Affectivity explained about 20% of the variance in post-therapy symptoms after controlling for pre-therapy symptoms.
Conclusions
The results suggest that therapeutic foci on hedonism (extraversion) and negative affectivity (neuroticism) could be important for working alliance formation and symptom reduction in therapy. Future research should examine whether changes in clients’ negative affectivity or hedonic capacity mediate the relation between perceived working alliance quality and clinical outcome in training and other psychotherapeutic contexts.
REFERENCES (50)
1.
Alexander, L. B., Luborsky, L., Greenberg, L. S., & Pinsof, W. M. (1986). The Penn Helping Alliance scales. In L. S. Greenberg & W. M. Pinsof (eds.), The Psychotherapeutic Process: A Research Handbook (pp. 325–366). New York: The Guilford Press.
2.
Axelsson, M. (2013). Personality and reasons for not using asthma medication in young adults. Heart & Lung, 42, 241–246. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.01.005.
3.
Baldwin, S. A., Murray, D. M., Shadish, W. R., Pals, S. L., Holland, J. M., Abramowitz, J. S., … & Watson, J. (2011). Intraclass correlation associated with therapists: estimates and applications in planning psychotherapy research. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 40, 15–33. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2010.520731.
4.
Baldwin, S. A., & Imel, Z. E. (2013). Therapist effects, findings and methods. In M. J. Lambert (ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed.) (pp. 258–297). New York, NY: Wiley.
5.
Binder, J. L., & Betan, E. J. (2013). Core competencies in brief dynamic psychotherapy: becoming a highly effective and competent brief dynamic psychotherapist. New York: Routledge.
6.
Blom, M. B. J., Spinhoven, P., Hoffman, T., Jonker, K., Hoencamp, E., Haffmans, P. M. J., & van Dyck, R. (2007). Severity and duration of depression, not personality factors, predict short term outcome in the treatment of major depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 104, 119–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.03.010.
7.
Campbell-Sills, L., Cohan, S. L., & Stein, M. B. (2006). Relationship of resilience to personality, coping, and psychiatric symptoms in young adults. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 585–599. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.05.001.
8.
Crits-Christoph, P., Baranackie, K., Kurcias, J. S., Beck, A. T., Carroll, K., Perry, K., … & Zitrin, C. (1991). Meta-analysis of therapist effects in psychotherapy outcome studies. Psychotherapy Research, 1, 81–91. doi: 10.1080/10503300500265025.
9.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
10.
Coleman, D. (2006). Client personality, working alliance and outcome: A pilot study. Social Work in Mental Health, 4, 83–98. doi: 10.1300/J200v04n04_06.
11.
De Fruyt, F., Van Leeuwen, K., Bagby, R. M., Rolland, J.-P., & Rouillon, F. (2006). Assessing and interpreting personality change and continuity in patients treated for major depression. Psychological Assessment, 18, 71–80. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.1.71.
12.
Elfström, M. L., Evans, C., Lundgren, J., Johansson, B., Hakeberg, M., & Carlsson, S. G. (2012).Validation of the Swedish version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 20, 447–455. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1788.
13.
Evans, C., Connell, J., Barkham, M., Margison, F., McGrath, G., Mellor-Clark, J., & Audin, K. (2002). Towards a standardized brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 51–60. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.1.51.
14.
Evans, C., Mellor-Clark, J., Margison, F., Barkham, M., Audin, K., Connell, J., & Mcgrath, G. (2000). CORE: Clinical outcomes in routine evaluation. Journal of Mental Health, 9, 247–255.
15.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed). Washington DC: SAGE.
16.
Gaston, L. (1991). Reliability and criterion-related validity of the California psychotherapy alliance scales-patient version. Psychological Assessment, 3, 68–74. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.3.1.68.
17.
Giluk, T. L. (2009). Mindfulness, Big five personality and affect: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 805–811. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.026.
18.
Goodwin, R. D., & Friedman, H. S. (2006). Health status and the five-factor personality traits in a national representative sample. Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 643–654. doi: 10.1177/1359105306066610.
19.
Goldberg, R. W., Rollins, A. L., & McNary, S. W. (2004). The Working Alliance Inventory: Modification and use with people with mental illness in a vocational rehabilitation program. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27, 267–270. doi: 10.2975/27.2004.267.270.
20.
Gunnarsson, M., & Gustavsson, J. P. (2013). Normative data for HP5i based on SOM investigation 2011. Unpublished Manuscript.
21.
Gunnarsson, M., Gustavsson, J. P., Tengström, A., Franck, A., & Fahlke, C. (2008). Personality traits and their associations with substance use among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 356–360. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.004.
22.
Gustavsson, J. P., Eriksson, A. K., Hilding, A., Gunnarsson, M., & Ostensson, C. G. (2008). Measurement invariance of personality traits from a Fivefactor model perspective: Multi-group confirmatory factor analyses of the HP5 inventory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 459–467. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00654.x.
23.
Gustavsson, J. P., Jönsson, E. G., Linder, J., & Weinryb, R. M. (2003). The HP5 inventory: definition and assessment of five health-relevant personality traits from a five-factor model perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 69–89. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00142-3.
24.
Hansson, W. E., Curry, K. T., & Bandalos, D. L. (2002). Reliability generalization of working alliance inventory scale scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 659–673. doi: 10.1177/0013164402062004008.
25.
Hatcher, R. L., & Barends, A. W. (1996). Patients’ view of the alliance in psychotherapy: exploratory factor analysis of three alliance measures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1326–1336. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.64.6.1326.
26.
Hedman, E., Andersson, G., Lindefors, N., Gustavsson, P., Lekander, M., Rűck, C., … & Ljótsson, B.
27.
(2014). Personality change following internet based cognitive behavior therapy for severe health anxiety. PLoS One, 9, 1–18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113871.
28.
Hemphälä, M., Gustavsson, P. J., & Tengström, A. (2013). The validity of the Health-relevant Personality Inventory (HP5i) and the Junior Temperament and Character Inventory (JTCI) among adolescents referred for a substance misuse problem. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 398–406. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.735301.
29.
Hill, C. E., & Knox, S. (2013). Training and supervision in psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed.) (pp. 775–812). New York, NY: Wiley.
30.
Hirsh, J. B., Quilty, L. C., Bagby, R. M., & McMain, S. F. (2012). The relationship between agreeableness and the development of the working alliance in patient with borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 616–627. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2012.26.4.616.
31.
Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223–233. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223.
32.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and Research (2nd ed.) (pp. 102–138). New York. NY: Guilford Press.
33.
Kendler, K. S., Gatz, M., Gardner, C. O., & Petersen, N. L. (2006). Personality and major depression: A Swedish longitudinal, population-based twin study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 1113–1120. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.10.1113.
34.
Kenny, D. A., Manetti, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). The statistical analysis of data from small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 126–137. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.126.
35.
Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 768–821. doi: 10.1037/a0020327.
36.
Krasner, M. S., Epstein, R. M., Beckman, H., Suchman, A. L., Chapman, B., Mooney, C. J., & Quill, T. E. (2009). Association of educational program in mindful communication with burnout, empathy, and attitudes among primary care physicians. JAMA, 302, 1284–1293. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1384.
37.
Lahey, B. B. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. American Psychology, 64, 241–256. doi: 10.1037/a0015309.
38.
Lee, K.-H., & Bowen, S. (2015). Relation between personality traits and mindfulness following mindfulness-based training: A study of incarcerated individuals with drug abuse disorders in Taiwan. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 13, 413–421. doi: 10.1007/s11469-014-9533-y.
39.
McWilliams, N. (2012). Beyond traits: Personality as intersubjective themes. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 563–570. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.711790.
40.
Mohaupt, H., Holgersen, H., Binder, P.-E., & Höstmark Nielsen, G. (2006). Affect consciousness or mentalization? A comparison of two concepts with regard to affect development and affect regulation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47, 237–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00513.x.
41.
Okiishi, J. C., Lambert, M. J., Eggett, D., Nielson, L., Dayton, D. D., & Vermeersch, D. A. (2006). An analysis of therapist treatment effects: Toward providing feedback to individual therapists on their clients’ psychotherapy outcome. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 1157–1172. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20272.
42.
Quilty, L. C., De Fruyt, F., Rolland, J.-P., Kennedy, S. H., Rouillon, P. F., & Bagby, R. M. (2008). Dimensional personality traits and treatment outcome in patients with major depressive disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 108, 241–250. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.10.022.
43.
Saulsman, L. M., & Page, A. C. (2004). The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1055–1085.
44.
Smits, D., Luyckx, K., Smits, D., Stinckens, N., & Claes, L. (2015). Structural characteristics and external correlates of the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form. Psychological Assessment, 27, 545–551. doi: 1040-3590/15 /$12.00.
45.
Spek, V., Nyklíček, I., Cuijpers, P, & Pop, V. (2008). Predictors of outcome of group and Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy. Journal of Affective Disorders, 105, 137–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.05.001.
46.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics, 6/E. Instock: Pearson.
47.
Tang, T. Z., DeRubeis, R. J., Hollon, S., Amsterdam, J., Shelton, R., & Schalet, B. (2009). Personality change during depression treatment. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66, 1322–1330. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.166.
48.
Trull, T. J., & Sher, K. J. (1994). Relationship between the Five-factor model of personality and Axis I disorders in a nonclinical sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 350–360. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.103.2.350.
49.
Westbrook, D., Kennerly, H., & Kirk, J. (2011). An introduction to cognitive behavior therapy: skills and applications (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
50.
Zinbarg, R. E., Uliaszek, A. A., & Adler, J. M. (2008). The role of personality in psychotherapy for anxiety and depression. Journal of Personality, 76, 1649–1688. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00534.x.
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
| eISSN: | 2353-561X |
| ISSN: | 2353-4192 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
