Reaching goals through different means: will and cognition in the action of people with low and high action control
More details
Hide details
SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland
Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk, Poland
Submission date: 2019-05-21
Final revision date: 2019-08-29
Acceptance date: 2019-09-05
Online publication date: 2019-09-26
Publication date: 2019-12-30
Current Issues in Personality Psychology 2019;7(4):274-287
When observing how people strive to achieve their goals, we can discern two main styles. Some people accomplish their goals mainly through strong will while others may need additional and compound plans to rely on. Two different modes of implemen-tation of intentional behavior are explored.

Participants and procedure:
Two correlational studies on young Polish adults (N = 227 and N = 516) were performed. Structural equations and modeling techniques using the partial least squares (PLS) method were used to verify the predictions.

The first investigation revealed that the intention of saving money is achieved through the mechanism of implementation inten-tion. It was found that people with a low level of action control (state-orientation) and people with a high level of action control (action-orientation) implement a similar level of saving behavior. However, they do so in different ways. Action-oriented partic-ipants also seemed to make plans, and these plans supported goal attainment, though this process did not affect behavior to the same degree as for state-oriented participants. The results are discussed, drawing on the Julius Kuhl Action Control Theory as well as its explication which is the Theory of Personality Systems Interactions.

The present research indicates that cognitive mechanisms may compensate for volitional deficits (planning behavior) in people with low action control, whereas in the case of people with a high level of action control their will (intensification of intentions) plays a crucial role.

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Berlin: Springer.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Orgnizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological re-search: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
Baumann, N., & Kuhl, J. (2005). How to resist temptation: The effects of external control versus autonomy support on self-regulatory dynamics. Journal of Personality, 73, 443–470.
Baumann, N., Kuhl, J., & Kazén, M. (2005). Left-hemispheric activation and self-infiltration: Testing a neuropsychological model of internalization. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 135–163.
Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Yielding to temptation: Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer be-havior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 670–676.
Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-regulation, ego depletion, and motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 115–128.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
Delgadillo, L. M. (2014). Financial clarity: Education, literacy, capability, counseling, planning, and coaching. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 43, 18–28.
Dholakia, U., Tam, L., Yoon, S., & Wong, N. (2016). The ant and the grasshopper: Understanding personal sav-ing orientation of consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 43, 134–155.
Drever, A. I., Odders-White, E., Kalish, C. W., Else-Quest, N. M., Hoagland, E. M., & Nelms, E. N. (2015). Foun-dations of financial well-being: Insights into the role of executive function, financial socialization, and expe-rience-based learning in childhood and youth. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 49, 13–38.
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087–1101.
Faber, R. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). Self-regulation and spending: Evidence from impulsive and compulsive buy-ing. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applica-tions (pp. 537–550). New York: The Guilford Press.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.
Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Exper-imental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1211–1226.
Iacobucci, D. (2010). Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 90–98.
Kazén, M., Baumann, N., & Kuhl, J. (2003). Self-infiltration vs. self-compatibility checking in dealing with unat-tractive tasks: The moderating influence of state vs. action orientation. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 157–197.
Kazén, M., Baumann, N., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Self-regulation after mortality salience: National pride feelings of action-oriented German participants. European Psychologist, 10, 218–228.
Kazén, M., Kuhl, J., & Leicht, E. M. (2014). When the going gets tough...: Self-motivation is associated with in-vigoration and fun. Psychological Research, 79, 1064–1076.
Kazén, M., Kuhl, J., & Quirin, M. (2015). Personality interacts with implicit affect to predict performance in ana-lytic versus holistic processing. Journal of Personality, 83, 251–261.
Kock, N. (2010). Using WarpPLS in e-collaboration studies: An overview of five main analysis steps. Interna-tional Journal of e-Collaboration, 6, 1–12.
Kock, N. (2011). Using WarpPLS in e-collaboration studies: Mediating effects, control and second order varia-bles, and algorithm choices. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 7, 1–13.
Kock, N. (2014a). A note on how to conduct a factor-based PLS-SEM analysis. International Journal of.
e-Collaboration, 11, 1–9.
Kock, N. (2014b). Advanced mediating effects tests, multi-group analyses, and measurement model assess-ments in PLS-based SEM. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 10, 1–13.
Kock, N. (2014c). Stable P value calculation methods in PLS-SEM. Laredo, TX: ScriptWarp Systems.
Kock, N., & Gaskins, L. (2016). Simpson’s paradox, moderation, and the emergence of quadratic relationships in path models: An information systems illustration. International Journal of Applied Nonlinear Science, 2, 200–234.
Kock, N., & Lynn, G. S. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustra-tion and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 546–580.
Kock, N., & Mayfield, M. (2015). PLS-based SEM Algorithms: The good neighbor assumption, collinearity, and nonlinearity. Information Management & Business Review, 7, 113–130.
Koole, S. L., Kuhl, J., Jostmann, N. B., & Finkenauer, C. (2005). Self-regulation in interpersonal relationships: The case of action versus state orientation. In K. D. Vohs & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Intrapersonal and interper-sonal processes: How they relate (pp. 1–39). New York: Guilford.
Koole, S. L., Schlinkert, C., Maldei, T., & Baumann, N. (2018). Becoming who you are: An integrative review of self-determination theory and personality systems interactions theory. Journal of Personality, 87, 15–36.
Koole, S. L., Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. L. (2015). Implicit emotion regulation: Feeling better without knowing why. Current Opinion in Psychology, 3, 6–10.
Kuhl, J. (1981). Motivational and functional helplessness: The moderating effect of state versus action orienta-tion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 155–170.
Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 13, 99–171.
Kuhl, J. (2000). A Functional-design approach to motivation and self-regulation: The dynamics of personality systems interactions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 111–169). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Kuhl, J. (2001). A functional approach to motivation. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 239–268). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J. (1994). Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Kuhl, J., Kazén, M., & Koole, S. L. (2006). Putting self-regulation theory into practice: A user’s manual. Applied Psychology, 55, 408–418.
Kuhl, J., Quirin, M., & Koole, S. L. (2015). Being someone: The integrated self as a neuropsychological system. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 115–132.
Loibl, C., Grinstein-Weiss, M., Zhan, M., & Red Bird, B. (2010). More than a penny saved: Long-term changes in behaviour among savings program participants. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 44, 98–126.
Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2016). Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience. Psychological Review, 123, 340–367.
Marszał-Wiśniewska, M. (2002). Adaptacja Skali Kontroli Działania J. Kuhla (ACS-90) [Adaptation of Kuhl’s Action Control Scale (ACS-90)]. Studia Psychologiczne, 40, 77–102.
Muraven, M., Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Self-control as a limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 774–789.
Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning and inference (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Peetz, J., & Buehler, R. (2009). Is there a budget fallacy? The role of savings goals in the prediction of personal spending. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1579–1591.
Pfister, R., Wirth, R., Schwarz, K., Steinhauser, M., & Kunde, W. (2016). Burdens of non-conformity: Motor exe-cution reveals cognitive conflict during deliberate rule violations. Cognition, 147, 93–99.
Pfister, R., Wirth, R., Weller, L., Foerster, A., & Schwarz, K. A. (2019). Taking shortcuts: Cognitive conflict during motivated rule-breaking. Journal of Economic Psychology, 71, 138–147.
Prochaska, J. O., Wright, J. A., & Velicer, W. F. (2008). Evaluating theories of health behavior change: A hierarchy of criteria applied to the transtheoretical model. Applied Psychology, 57, 561–588.
Quirin, M., Bode, R. C., & Kuhl, J. (2011). Recovering from negative events by boosting implicit positive affect. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 559–570.
Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170.
Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2011). Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path model-ing: Alternative methods and empirical results. Advances in International Marketing, 22, 195–218.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Treating unobserved heterogeneity in PLS-SEM: A multi-method approach. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (pp. 197–217). Cham: Springer.
Schlinkert, C., & Koole, S. L. (2018). Dealing with life demands: Action-state orientation moderates the relation between demanding conditions and drops in body vitality. Motivation Science, 4, 118–136.
Schwarzer, R. (2008). Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and mainte-nance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology, 57, 1–29.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Maier, S. F. (1967). Failure to escape traumatic shock. Journal of Experimental Psycholo-gy, 74, 1–9.
Sotiropoulos, V., & d’Astous, A. (2013). Attitudinal, self-efficacy, and social norms determinants of young con-sumers’ propensity to overspend on credit cards. Journal of Consumer Policy, 36, 179–196.
Steinmetz, H., Knappstein, M., Ajzen, I., Schmidt, P., & Kabst, R. (2016). How effective are behavior change interventions based on the theory of planned behavior? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 224, 216–233.
Taylor, M. P., Jenkins, S. P., & Sacker, A. (2011). Financial capability and psychological health. Journal of Eco-nomic Psychology, 32, 710–723.
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E, Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48, 159–205.
von Stumm, S., Fenton O’Creevy, M., & Furnham, A. (2013). Financial capability, money attitudes and socio-economic status: Risks for experiencing adverse financial events. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 344–349.
Willmott, D., Ryan, S., Sherretts, N., Woodfield, R., & McDermott, D. (2018). Motivation: A critical considera-tion of Freud and Rogers’ seminal conceptualisations. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 49, 229–234.
Wojdylo, K., Baumann, N., & Kuhl, J. (2017). The firepower of work craving: When self-control is burning under the rubble of self-regulation. PLoS One, 12, 1–17.
Worthy, S. L., Jonkman, J., & Blinn-Pike, L. (2010). Sensation-seeking, risk-taking, and problematic financial behaviors of college students. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 31,161–170.
Xiao, J. J., Chatterjee, S., & Kim, J. (2014). Factors associated with financial independence of young adults. In-ternational Journal of Consumer Studies, 38, 394–403.
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top