RESEARCH PAPER
Comprehensive psycholexical classification of Polish person-descriptive terms
1
Institute of Psychology, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
2
Institute of Psychology, University of Zielona Góra, Poland
3
Department of Psychology, Pedagogical University of Cracow, Poland
Submission date: 2018-11-13
Final revision date: 2019-01-11
Acceptance date: 2019-01-14
Online publication date: 2019-04-16
Publication date: 2019-06-24
Current Issues in Personality Psychology 2019;7(2):142-154
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Lexical research based on the assumption that all the main human characteristics are encoded in the natural language constitutes one of the alternative ways of developing a taxonomy of individual differences in psychology. The majority of studies to date, including Polish ones, have been restricted to the analysis of the adjective lexicon, which means their results are at risk of reduc-tionism. The aim of the presented research was to develop a classification of the complete Polish lexicon of person-descriptive terms (adjectives, participles, adverbs, nouns, and verbs).
Participants and procedure:
We analyzed 100,000 entries found in a universal dictionary of Polish and identified 27,813 terms used to describe human char-acteristics. The identified person-descriptive terms were classified by a team of 13 trained judges into 16 subcategories. The judges’ taxonomic decisions were tested for validity and reliability.
Results:
Personality (dispositional) descriptors (5,598) constitute 20.1% of the Polish lexicon of person-descriptors; this includes 1,641 adjectives and participles, 612 adverbs, 1,442 attribute-nouns, 1,029 type-nouns, and 916 verbs. The analysis of the semantic redundancy of terms representing different parts of speech but having the same common morpheme among dispositional de-scriptors revealed 1,979 morphemes with distinct meanings. Only 64% of these morphemes are represented by adjectives.
Conclusions:
Adjectives constitute the largest group of personality (dispositional) descriptors but do not account for the entire Polish person-ality lexicon. The results of the study are a point of departure for research into the specificity of the structure of personality de-scriptions in the Polish language using various linguistic categories and for a comprehensive study on the entire Polish personal-ity lexicon.
Lexical research based on the assumption that all the main human characteristics are encoded in the natural language constitutes one of the alternative ways of developing a taxonomy of individual differences in psychology. The majority of studies to date, including Polish ones, have been restricted to the analysis of the adjective lexicon, which means their results are at risk of reduc-tionism. The aim of the presented research was to develop a classification of the complete Polish lexicon of person-descriptive terms (adjectives, participles, adverbs, nouns, and verbs).
Participants and procedure:
We analyzed 100,000 entries found in a universal dictionary of Polish and identified 27,813 terms used to describe human char-acteristics. The identified person-descriptive terms were classified by a team of 13 trained judges into 16 subcategories. The judges’ taxonomic decisions were tested for validity and reliability.
Results:
Personality (dispositional) descriptors (5,598) constitute 20.1% of the Polish lexicon of person-descriptors; this includes 1,641 adjectives and participles, 612 adverbs, 1,442 attribute-nouns, 1,029 type-nouns, and 916 verbs. The analysis of the semantic redundancy of terms representing different parts of speech but having the same common morpheme among dispositional de-scriptors revealed 1,979 morphemes with distinct meanings. Only 64% of these morphemes are represented by adjectives.
Conclusions:
Adjectives constitute the largest group of personality (dispositional) descriptors but do not account for the entire Polish person-ality lexicon. The results of the study are a point of departure for research into the specificity of the structure of personality de-scriptions in the Polish language using various linguistic categories and for a comprehensive study on the entire Polish personal-ity lexicon.
REFERENCES (52)
1.
Almagor, M., Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. (1995). The Big Seven model: A cross-cultural replication and further exploration of the basic dimensions of natural language of trait descriptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 300–307.
2.
Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., & John, O. P. (1990). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German. A psycho-lexical study. European Journal of Personality, 4, 89–118.
3.
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2005). A defence of the lexical approach to the study of personality structure. European Journal of Personality, 19, 5–24.
4.
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., & De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356–366.
5.
Benet-Martínez, V., & Waller, N. G. (1997). Further evidence for the cross-cultural generality of the Big Seven Factor model: Indigenous and imported Spanish personality constructs. Journal of Personality, 65, 567–598.
6.
Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., & Reyes, J. A. S. (1996). Toward a taxonomy of trait adjectives in Filipino: Comparing personality lexicons across cultures. European Journal of Personality, 10, 3–24.
7.
Costa, P. T. Jr., McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 887–898.
8.
De Raad, B. (1998). Five Big, Big Five issues: Rationale, content, structure, status, and cross-cultural assessment. European Psychologist, 3, 113–124.
9.
De Raad, B., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). A new taxonomy of Dutch personality traits based on a comprehensive and unrestricted list of descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 347–364.
10.
De Raad, B., Barelds, D. P., Levert, E., Ostendorf, F., Mlačić, B., Blas, L. D., Hřebíčková, M., Szirmák, Z., Szarota, P., Perugini, M., & Church, A. T. (2010). Only three factors of personality description are fully replicable across languages: A comparison of 14 trait taxonomies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 160–173.
11.
De Raad, B., Barelds, D. P. H., Timmerman, M. E., De Roover, K., Mlačić, B., & Church, A. T. (2014). Towards a pancultural personality structure: Input from 11 psycho-lexical studies. European Journal of Personality, 28, 497–510.
12.
De Raad, B., Mulder, E., Kloosterman, K., & Hofstee, W. K. (1988). Personality‐descriptive verbs. European Journal of Personality, 2, 81–96.
13.
De Raad, B., & Ostendorf, F. (1996). Quantity and quality of trait-descriptive type nouns. European Journal of Personality, 10, 45–56.
14.
De Raad, B., Perugini, M., Hřebíčková, M., & Szarota, P. (1998). Lingua Franca of personality: Taxonomies and structures based on the psycholexical approach. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 212–232.
15.
De Raad, B., Van Oudenhoven, J. P., & Hofstede, M. (2005). Personality terms of abuse in three cultures: Type nouns between description and insult. European Journal of Personality, 19, 153–165.
16.
Di Blas, L., & Forzi, M. (1998). An alternative taxonomic study of personality-descriptive adjectives in the Italian language. European Journal of Personality, 12, 75–101.
17.
Di Blas, L., & Forzi, M. (1999). Refining a descriptive structure of personality attributes in the Italian language: The abridged Big Three circumplex structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 451–481.
18.
Dubisz, S. (Ed.) (2008). Uniwersalny słownik języka polskiego [The Universal Dictionary of the Polish Language]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
19.
Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley.
21.
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences. The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141–165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”. The Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.
23.
Gorbaniuk, O., Czarnecka, E., & Chmurzyńska, M. (2011). Taxonomy of person-descriptive terms in Polish: A psycho-lexical study. Current Problems of Psychiatry, 12, 100–106.
24.
Gorbaniuk, O., Budzińska, A., Owczarek, M., Bożek, E., & Juros, K. (2013). The factor structure of Polish personality-descriptive adjectives: An alternative psycho-lexical study. European Journal of Personality, 27, 304–318.
25.
Gorbaniuk, O., Kulewicz, P., Gorbaniuk, J., Kordon, A., Leoszko, W., Ivanova, A., & Suchomska, M. (2014). Taksonomia psycholeksykalna języka białoruskiego [A psycho-lexical taxonomy of Belarusian language]. Current Problems of Psychiatry, 15, 89–95.
26.
Gorbaniuk, O., Mirowich, A., Leoszko, W., Gorbaniuk, J., Kordon, A., Świderska, M., Kuts, O., & Korczak, A. (2018). A psycholexical classification of Ukrainian descriptors of individual differences. Current Problems of Psychiatry, 19, 1–8.
27.
Hřebíčková, M. (2007). The lexical approach to personality description in the Czech context. Ceskoslovenská Psychologie, 51, 50–61.
28.
Hřebíčková, M., Ostendorf, F., Osecká, L., & Cermák, I. (1999). Taxonomy and structure of Czech personality-relevant verbs. Personality Psychology in Europe, 7, 51–65.
29.
Ivanova, A., Gorbaniuk, O., Kordon., A., Gorbaniuk, J., Leoszko, W., & Kulewicz, P. (2017). The language lexicon as the source of knowledge of individual differences: a psycholexical study of Russian. Paper presented on XVIII International Slavonic Conference Literatures, cultures and East Slavonic languages with regard to their historical time. Zielona Góra, Poland, 22-23.05.2017.
30.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
31.
Krauss, S. (2006). Does ideology transcend culture? A preliminary examination in Romania. Journal of Personality, 74, 1219–1256.
32.
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.
33.
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2006). Further assessment of the HEXACO Personality Inventory: Two new facet scales and an observer report form. Psychological Assessment, 18, 182–191.
34.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. X. (1985). Updating Norman’s “adequate taxonomy”: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710–721.
35.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. X. (1987). Validation of the Five-Factor Model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.
36.
Mlačić, B., & Ostendorf, F. (2005). Taxonomy and structure of Croatian personality-descriptive adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 19, 117–152.
37.
Mlačić, B. (2016). Social and reputational aspects of personality. International Journal of Personality Psychology, 2, 15–36.
38.
Peabody, D., & De Raad, B. (2002). The substantive nature of psycholexical personality factors: A comparison across languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 983–997.
39.
Quevedo‐Aguado, M. P., Iraegui, A., Anivarro, E. M., & Ross, P. (1996). Linguistic descriptors of personality in the Spanish language: A first taxonomic study. European Journal of Personality, 10, 25–34.
40.
Saloni, Z. (2012). Podstawy teoretyczne „Słownika gramatycznego języka polskiego” [Theoretical basics of “Polish Grammar Dictionary”]. Warszawa: Sowa.
41.
Saucier, G. (1997). Effects of variable selection on the factor structure of person descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1296–1312.
42.
Saucier, G. (2000). Isms and the structure of social attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 366–385.
43.
Saucier, G. (2003). Factor structure of English-language personality type nouns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 695–708.
44.
Saucier, G. (2009a). Semantic and linguistic aspects of personality. In P. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 379–399). New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Saucier, G. (2009b). Recurrent personality dimensions in inclusive lexical studies: Indications for a Big Six structure. Journal of Personality, 77, 1577–1614.
46.
Saucier, G. (2010). The structure of social effects: Personality as impact on others. European Journal of Personality, 24, 222–240.
47.
Saucier, G., Hampson, S. E., & Goldberg, L. R. (2000). Cross-language studies of lexical personality factors. In S. E. Hampson (Ed.), Advances in personality psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1–36). London: Routledge.
48.
Saucier, G., & Srivastava, S. (2015). What makes a good structural model of personality? Evaluating the Big Five and alternatives. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 4: Personality Processes and Individual Differences (pp. 283–305). New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (2018). Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Dallas, Texas: SIL International.
50.
Szarota, P. (1995). Polska Lista Przymiotnikowa (PLP): Narzędzie do diagnozy pięciu wielkich czynników osobowości [Polish Adjective List: Instrument to assess the five-factor model of personality]. Studia Psychologiczne, 33, 227–256.
51.
Szarota, P., Ashton, M., & Lee, K. (2007). Taxonomy and structure of the Polish personality lexicon. European Journal of Personality, 21, 823–852.
52.
Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. G. (1987). Reexamining basic dimensions of natural language trait descriptors. Paper presented at the 95th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2353-561X |
| ISSN: | 2353-4192 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
