RESEARCH PAPER
I “love” my country? The relationship between national narcissism and national knowledge overclaiming
1
Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
2
University of Economics and Human Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
3
Department of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
Submission date: 2023-09-18
Final revision date: 2024-04-24
Acceptance date: 2024-06-03
Online publication date: 2024-10-02
Corresponding author
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Does demonstrating attachment to one’s nation necessarily imply that the individual is interested in the history of that nation and has a considerable knowledge about its origins? In the present paper, we examine how two forms of national identity (i.e., national narcissism vs. secure national identification) relate to individuals’ self-declared interest in their na-tion’s history. Additionally, we investigate whether this relationship can account for their tendency to overstate their knowledge.
Participants and procedure:
In two studies (Ntotal = 2137) conducted on a representative samples of adult Poles, we assessed two types of national identi-ty: self-declared interest in the nation’s history and objectively measured knowledge about the nation and its history through an overclaiming task.
Results:
We found that those who narcissistically identified with their nation overclaimed their historical knowledge. Specifically, they claimed familiarity with non-existing historical events and were unable to claim familiarity with existing ones. We also found that the relationship between national narcissism and declared interest in one’s nation’s history was effectively re-duced to zero after partialing out the shared variance to overclaiming historical knowledge.
Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that national narcissism might be a superficial self-presentation style, which is primarily focused on oneself, not on the nation. Those who narcissistically identify themselves with their nation only proclaim their interest, but have lower objective knowledge.
Does demonstrating attachment to one’s nation necessarily imply that the individual is interested in the history of that nation and has a considerable knowledge about its origins? In the present paper, we examine how two forms of national identity (i.e., national narcissism vs. secure national identification) relate to individuals’ self-declared interest in their na-tion’s history. Additionally, we investigate whether this relationship can account for their tendency to overstate their knowledge.
Participants and procedure:
In two studies (Ntotal = 2137) conducted on a representative samples of adult Poles, we assessed two types of national identi-ty: self-declared interest in the nation’s history and objectively measured knowledge about the nation and its history through an overclaiming task.
Results:
We found that those who narcissistically identified with their nation overclaimed their historical knowledge. Specifically, they claimed familiarity with non-existing historical events and were unable to claim familiarity with existing ones. We also found that the relationship between national narcissism and declared interest in one’s nation’s history was effectively re-duced to zero after partialing out the shared variance to overclaiming historical knowledge.
Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that national narcissism might be a superficial self-presentation style, which is primarily focused on oneself, not on the nation. Those who narcissistically identify themselves with their nation only proclaim their interest, but have lower objective knowledge.
REFERENCES (38)
1.
Bocian, K., Cichocka, A., & Wojciszke, B. (2021). Moral tribalism: Moral judgments of actions supporting ingroup interests depend on collective narcissism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp....
2.
Cameron, J. E. (2004). A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3, 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/135765....
3.
Chen, P., Pruysers, S., & Blais, J. (2021). The dark side of politics: Participation and the Dark Triad. Political Studies, 69, 577–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/003232....
4.
Cichocka, A. (2016). Understanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: The role of collective narcissism. European Review of Social Psychology, 27, 283–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/104632....
5.
Cichocka, A., & Cisłak, A. (2020). Nationalism as collective narcissism. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobe....
6.
Cichocka, A., Cisłak, A., Gronfeldt, B., & Wójcik, A. D. (2022). Can ingroup love harm the ingroup? Collective narcissism and objectification of ingroup members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25, 1718–1738. https://doi.org/10.1177/136843....
7.
Federico, C. M., Golec de Zavala, A., & Bu, W. (2023). Collective narcissism as a basis for nationalism. Political Psychology, 44, 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.1....
8.
Golec de Zavala, A., Cichocka, A., Eidelson, R., & Jayawickreme, N. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1074–1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00169....
9.
Golec de Zavala, A., Federico, C. M., Sedikides, C., Guerra, R., Lantos, D., Mroziński, B., Cypryańska, M., & Baran, T. (2020). Low self-esteem predicts out-group derogation via collective narcissism, but this relation-ship is obscured by in-group satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119, 741–764. http://doi.org/10.1037/pspp000....
10.
Golec de Zavala, A., & Keenan, O. (2021). Collective narcissism as a framework for understanding populism. Jour-nal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 5, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.6....
11.
Golec de Zavala, A., Peker, M., Guerra, R., & Baran, T. (2016). Collective narcissism predicts hypersensitivity to in-group insult and direct and indirect retaliatory intergroup hostility. European Journal of Personality, 30, 532–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.20....
12.
Górska, P., Stefaniak, A., Malinowska, K., Lipowska, K., Marchlewska, M., Budziszewska, M., & Maciantowicz, O. (2020). Too great to act in solidarity: The negative relationship between collective narcissism and solidarity-based collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2....
13.
Główczewski, M., Wójcik, A. D., Cichocka, A., & Cisłak, A. (2022). “Cause we are the champions of the world”: National narcissism and group-enhancing historical narratives. Social Psychology, 53, 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9....
14.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based ap-proach. Guilford Press.
15.
Jaśkiewicz, M., & Sobiecki, J. (2021). When out-groups are perceived as out of place: Urban disorder sensitivity and environmental distance. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 10, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2....
16.
Jaśko, K., Webber, D., Kruglanski, A. W., Gelfand, M., Taufiqurrohman, M., Hettiarachchi, M., & Gunaratna, R. (2020). Social context moderates the effects of quest for significance on violent extremism. Journal of Personali-ty and Social Psychology, 118, 1165–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi00....
17.
Jones, D. N., Neria, A. L., Helm, F. A., Sahlan, R. N., & Carre, J. R. (2020). Religious overclaiming and support for religious aggression. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11, 1011–1021. https://doi.org/10.1177/194855....
18.
Kemmelmeier, M., & Winter, D. G. (2008). Sowing patriotism, but reaping nationalism? Consequences of expo-sure to the American flag. Political Psychology, 29, 859–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467....
19.
Klar, Y., & Bilewicz, M. (2017). From socially motivated lay historians to lay censors: Epistemic conformity and defensive group identification. Memory Studies, 10, 334–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/175069....
20.
Kruglanski, A., Jaśko, K., Webber, D., Chernikova, M., & Molinaro, E. (2018). The making of violent extremists. Review of General Psychology, 22, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr000....
21.
Li, M., & Nie, A. (2022). “I” always cooperate: Self-positivity bias in destination memory for cooperation and cheating. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 18, 2–19. https://doi.org/10.5809/acp-03....
22.
Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., Furman, A., & Cisłak, A. (2022). Who respects the will of the people? Support for democracy is linked to high secure national identity but low national narcissism. British Journal of Social Psy-chology, 61, 599–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.1....
23.
Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., Jaworska, M., Golec de Zavala, A., & Bilewicz, M. (2020). Superficial ingroup love? Collective narcissism predicts ingroup image defense, outgroup prejudice, and lower ingroup loyalty. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 59, 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.1....
24.
Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., Łozowski, F., Górska, P., & Winiewski, M. (2019). In search of an imaginary ene-my: Catholic collective narcissism and the endorsement of gender conspiracy beliefs. The Journal of Social Psy-chology, 159, 766–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/002245....
25.
Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., Panayiotou, O., Castellanos, K., & Batayneh, J. (2017). Populism as identity poli-tics: Perceived in-group disadvantage, collective narcissism, and support for populism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/194855....
26.
Marchlewska, M., Górska, P., Green, R., Szczepańska, D., Rogoza, R., Molenda, Z., & Michalski, P. (2024). From individual anxiety to collective narcissism? Adult attachment styles and different types of national commit-ment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 50, 495–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616....
27.
Michalski, P., Marchlewska, M., Górska, P., Rogoza, M., Molenda, Z., & Szczepańska, D. (2023). When the sun goes down: Low political knowledge and high national narcissism predict climate change and conspiracy be-liefs. Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/002245....
28.
Molenda, Z., Marchlewska, M., & Rogoza, M. (2023). Nothing hurts like (in-group) love? National narcissism, con-spiracy intentions, and non-prosocial managing emotions of others. Personality and Individual Differences, 201, 111947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid....
29.
Paulhus, D. L. (2012). Overclaiming on personality questionnaires. In M. Ziegler, C. MacCann, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), New perspectives on faking in personality assessment (pp. 151–164). Oxford University Press.
30.
Paulhus, D. L., Harms, P. D., Bruce, M. N., & Lysy, D. C. (2003). The over-claiming technique: Measuring self-enhancement independent of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 890–904. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3....
31.
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, fa-miliarity, and analytic thinking. Journal of Personality, 88, 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.1....
32.
Petrovska, I. (2023). Typology of civic identity. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 11, 150–161. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2....
33.
Rogoza, M., Marchlewska, M., & Szczepańska, D. (2022a). Why dark personalities participate in politics? Personal-ity and Individual Differences, 186, 111319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid....
34.
Rogoza, R., Cieciuch, J., & Strus, W. (2022b). Vulnerable isolation and enmity concept: Disentangling the blue and dark face of vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 96, 104167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.....
35.
Sani, F., Bowe, M., & Herrera, M. (2008). Perceived collective continuity and social well‐being: Exploring the con-nections. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.4....
36.
Stephens, W., Sieckelinck, S., & Boutellier, H. (2021). Preventing violent extremism: a review of the literature. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 44, 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/105761....
37.
Wójcik, A. D., & Lewicka, M. (2022). Between discovery and exploitation of history: Lay theories of history and their connections to national identity and interest in history. Memory Studies, 15, 1497–1516. https://doi.org/10.1177/175069....
38.
Van Prooijen, J. W., & Krouwal, A. P. M. (2019). Overclaiming knowledge predicts anti-establishment voting. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11, 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/194855....
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
| eISSN: | 2353-561X |
| ISSN: | 2353-4192 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
