RESEARCH PAPER
The Polish adaptation of the Revised NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland
2
Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics, Department of Criminology and Security Studies, University of Wroc-law, Wroclaw, Poland
Submission date: 2021-06-15
Final revision date: 2021-12-05
Acceptance date: 2021-12-13
Online publication date: 2022-02-17
Publication date: 2022-09-30
 
Current Issues in Personality Psychology 2022;10(3):177–183
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we introduce the Polish adaptation of the Revised NICHD (National Institute of Child Health and Hu-man Development) Investigative Interview Protocol (2014). The protocol is an evidence-based method for interview-ing child witnesses and crime victims. Compared with the Standard NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol (2008), the revised version includes strategies and techniques for providing emotional support to the interviewed child. This paper describes both the standard and the revised versions of the protocol, presents scientific evidence for its effica-cy, and introduces the Polish language adaptation of the tool. The recipients of this methodological instrument could include judges and forensic psychology expert witnesses, who are to actively participate in interviewing child wit-nesses and victims under Article 185 of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure, as well as students of law, psychology and criminology preparing to perform these roles in the future.
 
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Ahern, E. C., Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., Blasbalg, U., & Karni-Visel, Y. (2019). Examining reluctance and emotional support in forensic interviews with child victims of substantiated physical abuse. Applied De-velopmental Science, 23, 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/108886....
 
2.
Blasbalg, U., Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., & Karni-Visel, Y. (2021). Adherence to the Revised NICHD Proto-col recommendations for conducting repeated supportive interviews is associated with the likelihood that children will allege abuse. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 27, 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/law000....
 
3.
Cyr, M., Lamb, M. E., Pelletier, J., Leduc, P., & Perron, A. (2006). Assessing the effectiveness of the NICHD In-vestigative Interview protocol in Francophone Quebec. Paper presented at the Second International Inves-tigative Interviewing Conference, Portsmouth, UK, July 5-7.
 
4.
Ghetti, S., & Goodman, G. (2001). Resisting suggestion. American Psychologist, 14, 592–595.
 
5.
Hershkowitz, I., Ahern, E. C., Lamb, M. E., Blasbalg, U., Karni‐Visel, Y., & Breitman, M. (2017). Changes in in-terviewers’ use of supportive techniques during the Revised Protocol training. Applied Cognitive Psychol-ogy, 31, 340–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.33....
 
6.
Hershkowitz, I., & Lamb, M. E. (2020). Allegation rates and credibility assessment in forensic investigations of alleged child abuse victims: Comparing the revised and standard NICHD protocols. Psychology, Public Policy and the Law, 26, 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/law000....
 
7.
Hershkowitz, I., Horowitz, D., & Lamb, M. E. (2005). Trends in children’s disclosure of abuse in Israel: a national study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29, 1203–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chia....
 
8.
Hershkowitz, I., Horowitz, D., & Lamb, M. E. (2007). Individual and family variables associated with disclo-sure and nondisclosure of child abuse in Israel. In M. E. Pipe, M. E. Lamb, Y. Orbach, & A. C. Cederborg (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Disclosure, delay, and denial (pp. 65–75). Erlbaum.
 
9.
Hershkowitz, I., Lamb M. E., & Katz, C. (2014). Allegation rates in forensic child abuse investigations: Com-paring the revised and standard NICHD protocols. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00373....
 
10.
Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., Katz, C., & Malloy, L. C. (2015). The role of rapport-building when interviewing reluctant children: a field test of the Revised NICHD Protocol. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30, 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896....
 
11.
Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., & Horowitz, D. (2006). Dynamics of forensic interviews with suspected abuse victims who do not disclose abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 30, 753–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chia....
 
12.
Karni-Visel, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Blasbalg, U., & Lamb, M. E. (2018). Emotional expression and children’s re-ports of intra-familial abuse. Paper presented at the American Psychology Law Society Conference, Mem-phis, USA.
 
13.
Karni-Visel, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., & Blasbalg, U. (2019). Facilitating the expression of emotions by alleged victims of child abuse during investigative interviews using the Revised NICHD Protocol. Child Maltreatment, 24, 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/107755....
 
14.
Lamb, M. E., Brown, D. A., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P. W. (2018). Tell me what happened: Struc-tured investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses (2nd ed.). Wiley.
 
15.
Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P. (2008). Tell me what happened: Structured investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses. Wiley.
 
16.
Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Orbach, Y., Aldridge, J., Bowler, L., Pearson, S., & Esplin, P. W. (2006). Enhancing the quality of investigative interviews by British police officers. Paper presented at the Second Internation-al Investigative Interviewing Conference, Portsmouth, UK, July 5-7.
 
17.
Lamb, M. (2016). Difficulties translating research on forensic interview practices to practitioners: Finding water, leading horses, but can we get them to drink? American Psychologist, 71, 710–718. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp000....
 
18.
Lyon, T. D. (2005). Ten step investigative interview. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/thoma....
 
19.
Lyon, T. D. (2017). Investigative interviewing of the child. In D. N. Duquette & A. M. Haralambie (Eds.), Child welfare law and practice (2nd ed., pp. 87–113). Bradford.
 
20.
Malloy, L. C., Lyon, T. D., & Quas, J. A. (2007). Filial dependency and recantation of child sexual abuse allega-tions. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi....
 
21.
Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2000). Assessing the value of structured protocols for forensic interviews of alleged abuse victims. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0145-....
 
22.
Orbach, Y., Shiloach, H., & Lamb, M. E. (2007). Reluctant disclosures of child sexual abuse. In M. E. Pipe, M. E. Lamb, Y. Orbach, & A. C. Cederborg (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Disclosure, delay, and denial (pp. 115–134). Erlbaum.
 
23.
Pipe, M. E., Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Stewart, H. L., Sternberg, K. J., & Esplin, P. W. (2007). Factors associated with non-disclosure of suspected abuse during forensic interviews. In M. E. Pipe, M. E. Lamb, Y. Orbach, & A. C. Cederborg (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Disclosure, delay and denial (pp. 77–96). Erlbaum.
 
24.
Ruddock, A. C. (2006). The relationship of interviewer rapport behaviors to the amount and type of disclo-sure from children during child abuse investigations. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 67(4-B), 2241.
 
25.
Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., & Mitchell, S. (2001). Use of a structured investigative protocol enhances young children’s responses to free-recall prompts in the course of forensic interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 997–1005. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9....
 
eISSN:2353-561X
ISSN:2353-4192