RESEARCH PAPER
Who agrees more? The role of age, education, and the ability to solve verbal analogies in acquiescence
1
Center of Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
2
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy and Arts, University of Trnava, Trnava, Slovak Republic
Submission date: 2023-03-08
Final revision date: 2024-03-14
Acceptance date: 2024-04-02
Online publication date: 2024-07-03
Corresponding author
Patrik Havan
Center of Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Center of Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Acquiescence as one of the response styles is the participant’s tendency to shift answers to agreement rather than to disa-greement regardless of the items’ content. Acquiescence together with other response styles could be a serious threat to the results of research. It can be affected by several individual characteristics including cognitive abilities. We explored the rela-tionship between the ability to solve verbal analogies, age, education, and acquiescence.
Participants and procedure:
The sample contained 210 participants, 109 men and 101 women with age ranging from 17 to 70 (M = 45.11, SD = 13.66). The data were collected through an online panel of a research agency. We used Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) for estimating acquiescence and 10 tasks for measuring the ability to solve verbal analogies.
Results:
We found a significant relationship between acquiescence and age with a medium effect and non-significant relationships between acquiescence, the ability to solve verbal analogies, and education.
Conclusions:
Education seems not to be an adequate variable as a proxy for cognitive variables, and the ability to solve verbal analogies probably does not affect acquiescence in general. However, the existence of a negative relationship between age and acquies-cence is quite surprising, and it could be caused by better developed self-identity of older participants.
Acquiescence as one of the response styles is the participant’s tendency to shift answers to agreement rather than to disa-greement regardless of the items’ content. Acquiescence together with other response styles could be a serious threat to the results of research. It can be affected by several individual characteristics including cognitive abilities. We explored the rela-tionship between the ability to solve verbal analogies, age, education, and acquiescence.
Participants and procedure:
The sample contained 210 participants, 109 men and 101 women with age ranging from 17 to 70 (M = 45.11, SD = 13.66). The data were collected through an online panel of a research agency. We used Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) for estimating acquiescence and 10 tasks for measuring the ability to solve verbal analogies.
Results:
We found a significant relationship between acquiescence and age with a medium effect and non-significant relationships between acquiescence, the ability to solve verbal analogies, and education.
Conclusions:
Education seems not to be an adequate variable as a proxy for cognitive variables, and the ability to solve verbal analogies probably does not affect acquiescence in general. However, the existence of a negative relationship between age and acquies-cence is quite surprising, and it could be caused by better developed self-identity of older participants.
REFERENCES (36)
1.
Billiet, J. B., & McClendon, M. J. (2000). Modeling acquiescence in measurement methods for two balanced sets of items. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 608–628. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328....
2.
Chylíková, J. (2020). (Un)expected exception: Validating acquiescent response style factor in the Czech Republic. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23, 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/136455....
3.
Costello, S., & Roodenburg, J. (2015). Acquiescence response bias – yeasaying and higher education. The Australi-an Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 32, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.20....
4.
Čavojová, V., & Jurkovič, M. (2017). Comparison of experienced vs. novice teachers in cognitive reflection and rationality. Studia Psychologica, 59, 100–112. https://doi.org/10.21909/sp.20....
5.
Danner, D., Aichholzer, J., & Rammstedt, B. (2015). Acquiescence in personality questionnaires: Relevance, do-main specificity and stability. Journal of Research in Personality, 57, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.....
6.
Danner, D., & Rammstedt, B. (2016). Facets of acquiescence: Agreeing with negations is not the same as accepting inconsistency. Journal of Research in Personality, 57, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.....
7.
Davis, R. E., Lee, S., Johnson, T. P., Conrad, F., Resnicow, K., Thrasher, J. F., Mesa, A., & Peterson, K. E. (2020). The influence of item characteristic on acquiescence among Latino survey respondents. Field Methods, 32, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/152582....
8.
DiStefano, C., Morgan, G. B., & Motl, R. W. (2012). Detecting acquiescence underlying Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale using the Rasch partial credit model. In S. De Wals & K. Meszaros (Eds.), Handbook on psychology of self-esteem (pp. 195–210). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
9.
Duran, R. P., Enright, M. K., & Peirce, L. P. (1987). GRE verbal analogy items: Examinee reasoning on items. ETS Research Report, 1987, i-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2330....
10.
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2010). Acquiescence as a source of bias and model and person misfit: a theoretical and empirical analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63, 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711....
11.
Fronczyk, K., & Witkowska, E. (2020). Social desirability dimensionality: One or two continua? Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 8, 229–242. https://doi.org/10.5144/cipp.2....
12.
George, T., & Mielicki, M. K. (2023). Bullshit receptivity, problem solving, and metacognition: Simply the BS, not better than all the rest. Thinking & Reasoning, 29, 213–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/135467....
13.
Halama, P. (2008). Confirmatory factor analysis of Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in a sample of Slovak high school and university students. Studia Psychologica, 50, 255–266.
14.
Havan, P., Kohút, M., & Halama, P. (2022). Time stability of acquiescence as estimated by manifest and latent ap-proaches. Studia Psychologica, 64, 329–342. https://doi.org/10.31577/sp.20....
15.
Havan, P., Kohút, M., & Halama, P. (under review). Interaction of social deference and cognitive processing in the prediction of acquiescence.
16.
He, J., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2017). Choosing an adequate design and analysis in cross-cultural personality re-search. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 5, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.5114/CIPP.2....
17.
Johanson, G. A., & Osborn, C. J. (2004). Acquiescence as differential person functioning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 535–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/026029....
18.
Lechner, C. M., Partsch, M. V., Danner, D., & Rammstedt, B. (2019). Individual, situational and cultural correlates of acquiescence responding: Towards a unified conceptual framework. British Journal of Mathematical and Sta-tistical Psychology, 72, 426–446. https://doi.org/10.1111.bmsp.1....
19.
Lechner, C. M., & Rammstedt, B. (2015). Cognitive ability, acquiescence, and the structure of personality in a sample of older adults. Psychological Assessment, 27, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas000....
20.
Meisenberg, G., & Williams, A. (2008). Are acquiescent and extreme response style related to low intelligence and education? Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1539–1550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid....
21.
Morsanyi, K., Hamilton, J., Stamenković, D., & Holyoak, K. J. (2022). Linking metaphor comprehension with ana-logical reasoning: Evidence from typical development and autism spectrum disorder. British Journal of Psy-chology, 113, 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.1....
22.
Mruk, C. J. (2006). Self-esteem research, theory, and practice: Toward a positive psychology of self-esteem. Springer Publishing Company.
23.
Park, M., & Wu, A. D. (2019). Item response tree models to investigate acquiescence and extreme response styles in Likert-type rating scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 911–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316....
24.
Primi, R., Santos, D., De Fruyt, F., & John, O. P. (2019). Comparison of classical and modern methods for measur-ing and correcting for acquiescence. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72, 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.1....
25.
Rammstedt, B., Danner, D., & Bosnjak, M. (2017). Acquiescence response styles: a multilevel model explaining individual-level and country-level differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 107, 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid....
26.
Rammstedt, B., Danner, D., & Martin, S. (2016). The association between personality and cognitive ability: Going beyond simple effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 62, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.....
27.
Rammstedt, B., & Kemper, C. J. (2011). Measurement equivalence of The Big Five: Shedding further light on po-tential causes of the educational bias. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.....
28.
Rammstedt, B., Kemper, C. J., & Borg, I. (2013). Correcting Big Five personality measurements for acquiescence: an 18-country cross-cultural study. European Journal of Personality, 27, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.18....
29.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
30.
Savalei, V., & Falk, C. F. (2014). Recovering substantive factor loadings in the presence of acquiescence bias: a comparison of three approaches. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49, 407–424. https://.
32.
Schneider, S., Junghaenel, D. U., Meijer, E., Zelinski, E. M., Jin, H., Lee, P. J., & Stone, A. A. (2022). Quality of sur-vey responses at older ages predicts cognitive decline and mortality risk. Innovation in Aging, 6, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni....
33.
Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of big five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 718–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3....
34.
Tourangeau, R., & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). Cognitive processing underlying contexts effects in attitude measure-ment. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2....
35.
Weijters, B., Baumgartner, H., & Schillewaert, N. (2013). Reverse item bias: an integrative model. Psychological Methods, 18, 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00321....
36.
Wetzel, E., Lüdtke, O., Zettler, I., & Böhnke, J. R. (2016). The stability of extreme response style and acquiescence over 8 years. Assessment, 23, 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319....
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
| eISSN: | 2353-561X |
| ISSN: | 2353-4192 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
