RESEARCH PAPER
Time perspective and self-control: metacognitive management of time is important for efficient self-regulation of behavior
1
Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
Submission date: 2020-01-15
Final revision date: 2020-06-24
Acceptance date: 2020-06-29
Online publication date: 2020-06-30
Publication date: 2020-07-20
Current Issues in Personality Psychology 2020;8(2):83-91
KEYWORDS
executive functionsself-regulationtime perspectiveself-controltemporal metacognitioninhibitory controlfluid intelligence
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
The way people perceive time is interesting in itself but also as a predictor of social, cognitive, and affective aspects of behavior. It is also a correlate of important psychological traits.
Participants and procedure:
In this study, we investigated associations between psychometrically assessed self-control and metacognitive processes involved in time perspective (TP). Time perspective is defined as the engagement of temporal frames for better understanding the flow of events and personal experiences. Executive control and fluid intelligence were assessed as possible mediators of the investigated relationship. Participants (N = 150) completed the Temporal MetaCognition Scale (TMCS), Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices (RAPM) and two inhibitory control tasks: the Stroop and Stop Signal Task (SST). Self-control was measured with three questionnaires: NAS-50, NAS-40, and the Self-Control Scale (SCS).
Results:
Temporal metacognition was found to be associated with self-control, but not with executive control and fluid intelligence. Two TMCS dimensions (Goal-oriented Metatemporal Interconnectedness, Metacognitive Temporal Control) were important positive predictors of self-control, whereas the third dimension (Cognitive Reconstruction of the Past) was a weak negative predictor.
Conclusions:
These findings support the hypothesis that metacognitive processes involved in time perspective may help to exert control over one’s own behavior. The most important predictor of self-control is the ability to consider situations from various time perspec-tives.
The way people perceive time is interesting in itself but also as a predictor of social, cognitive, and affective aspects of behavior. It is also a correlate of important psychological traits.
Participants and procedure:
In this study, we investigated associations between psychometrically assessed self-control and metacognitive processes involved in time perspective (TP). Time perspective is defined as the engagement of temporal frames for better understanding the flow of events and personal experiences. Executive control and fluid intelligence were assessed as possible mediators of the investigated relationship. Participants (N = 150) completed the Temporal MetaCognition Scale (TMCS), Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices (RAPM) and two inhibitory control tasks: the Stroop and Stop Signal Task (SST). Self-control was measured with three questionnaires: NAS-50, NAS-40, and the Self-Control Scale (SCS).
Results:
Temporal metacognition was found to be associated with self-control, but not with executive control and fluid intelligence. Two TMCS dimensions (Goal-oriented Metatemporal Interconnectedness, Metacognitive Temporal Control) were important positive predictors of self-control, whereas the third dimension (Cognitive Reconstruction of the Past) was a weak negative predictor.
Conclusions:
These findings support the hypothesis that metacognitive processes involved in time perspective may help to exert control over one’s own behavior. The most important predictor of self-control is the ability to consider situations from various time perspec-tives.
REFERENCES (45)
1.
Akirmak, U. (2019). The validity and reliability of the Zimbardo time perspective inventory in a Turkish sam-ple. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144....
2.
Avci, S. (2013). Relations between self-regulation, future time perspective and the delay of gratification in uni-versity students. Education, 133, 525–537.
3.
Baird, H. M., Webb, T. L., Martin, J., & Sirois, F. M. (2017). The relationship between time perspective and self-regulatory processes, abilities and outcomes: A protocol for a meta-analytical review. BMJ Open, 7, e017000.
4.
Chittaro, L., & Vianello, A. (2013). Time perspective as a predictor of problematic Internet use: A study of Fa-cebook users. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 989–993.
5.
Baumeister, R. F., & Tierney, J. (2011). Willpower: Rediscovering the greatest human strength. New York: Pen-guin Books.
6.
Casey, B. J., Somerville, L. H., Gotlib, I. H., Ayduk, O., Franklin, N. T., Askren, M. K., ... & Glover, G. (2011). Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later. Proceedings of the National Acad-emy of Sciences, 108, 14998–15003.
7.
Chuderski, A., Taraday, M., Nęcka, E., & Smoleń, T. (2012). Storage capacity explains fluid intelligence but ex-ecutive control does not. Intelligence, 40, 278–295.
8.
Fairchild, A. J., & McDaniel, H. L. (2017). Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: mediation analysis. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 105, 1259–1271. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.1....
9.
Fieulaine, N., & Martinez, F. (2011). About the fuels of self-regulation: Time perspective and desire for control in adolescents substance use. In V. Barkoukis (Ed.), The Psychology of Self-Regulation (pp. 102–121). Nova Science Publishers.
10.
Fox, L. A., Shor, R. E., & Steinman, R. J. (1971). Semantic gradients and interference in naming color, spatial direction, and numerosity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/h00318....
11.
Griva, F., Tseferidi, S. I., & Anagnostopoulos, F. (2015). Time to get healthy: Associations of time perspective with perceived health status and health behaviors. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 20, 25–33.
12.
Hodgins, D. C., & Engel, A. (2002). Future time perspective in pathological gamblers. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 190, 775–780.
13.
Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Science, 16, 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics....
14.
Jochemczyk, Ł., Pietrzak, J., Buczkowski, R., Stolarski, M., & Markiewicz, Ł. (2017). You only live once: pre-sent-hedonistic time perspective predicts risk propensity. Personality and Individual Differences, 115, 148–153.
15.
Kim, J., Hong, H., Lee, J., & Hyun, M. H. (2017). Effects of time perspective and self-control on procrastination and Internet addiction. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6, 229–236.
16.
Kotabe, H. P., & Hofmann, W. (2015). On integrating the components of self-control. Perspectives on Psycho-logical Science, 10, 618–638.
17.
Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users’ guide to the stop signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory, and Language (pp. 189–239). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18.
McKay, M. T., Andretta, J. R., Magee, J., & Worrell, F. C. (2014). What do temporal profiles tell us about adoles-cent alcohol use? Results from a large sample in the United Kingdom. Journal of Adolescence, 37, 1319–1328.
19.
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. I. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244, 933–938.
20.
Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., Houts, R., Poulton, R., Rob-erts, B. W., Ross, S., Sears, M. R., Thomson, W. M., & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 2693–2698.
21.
Mooney, A., Earl, J. K., Mooney, C. H., & Bateman, H. (2017). Using balanced time perspective to explain well-being and planning in retirement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1781.
22.
Nęcka, E., Gruszka, A., Orzechowski, J., Nowak, M., & Wójcik, N. (2018). The (in)significance of executive func-tions for the trait of self-control: A psychometric study. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1139. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.....
23.
Nęcka, E., Wujcik, R., Orzechowski, J., Gruszka, A., Janik, B., Nowak, M., & Wójcik, N. (2016). NAS-50 and NAS-40: New scales for the assessment of self-control. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 47, 346–355.
24.
Oyanadel, C., & Buela-Casal, G. (2014). Time perception and psychopathology: influence of time perspective on quality of life of severe mental illness. Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría, 42, 99–107.
25.
Pilarska, A., & Baumeister, R. F. (2018). Psychometric properties and correlates of the Polish versions of the Self-Control Scale (SCS). Polish Psychological Bulletin, 49, 95–106. https://doi.org/10.24425/11947....
26.
Przepiorka, A., Sobol-Kwapińska, M., & Jankowski, T. (2016). A Polish short version of the Zimbardo Time Per-spective Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 78–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pa....
27.
Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1983). Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. London: H.K. Lewis & CoLtd.
28.
Romal, J. B., & Kaplan, B. J. (1995). Difference in self-control among spenders and savers. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 32, 8–17.
29.
Scholer, A. A., & Higgins, E. T. (2010). Conflict and control at different levels of self-regulation. In R. Hassin, K. Ochsner, & Y. Trope. (Eds.), Self control in society, mind, and brain (pp. 312–334). Oxford, UK: Oxford Uni-versity Press.
30.
Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Peake, P. K. (1990). Predicting adolescent cognitive and self-regulatory competencies from preschool delay of gratification: Identifying diagnostic conditions. Developmental Psychology, 26, 978.
31.
Sirois, F. M. (2014). Out of sight, out of time? A meta‐analytic investigation of procrastination and time perspec-tive. European Journal of Personality, 28, 511–520.
32.
Skogen, J. C., & Nesvåg, S. (2019). Factor structure of Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI) in a Norwegian convenience sample. Timing and Time Perception, 7, 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1163/221344....
33.
Sobol-Kwapińska, M., & Jankowski, T. (2016). Positive time: Balanced time perspective and positive orienta-tion. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 1511–1528.
34.
Stanescu, D. F., & Iorga, M. E. (2015). An exploratory study regarding the relations between time perspective, achievement motivation and self-regulation. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 3, 7.
35.
Stolarski, M., & Witowska, J. (2017). Balancing one’s own time perspective from aerial view: Metacognitive processes in temporal framing. In A. Kostić, & D. Chadee (Eds.), Time Perspective (pp. 117–141). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
Stolarski, M., Zajenkowski, M., & Zajenkowska, A. (2016). Aggressive? From time to time… Uncovering the complex associations between time perspectives and aggression. Current Psychology, 35, 506–515.
37.
Storey, F. S. (1999). Childhood abuse and self-regulation: Risk factors for heroin addiction. Dissertation Ab-stracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 59, 3717.
38.
Suneja, A., Joseph, J. V., & Pragyendu (2015). Effects of the time perspectives on substance abuse. The Interna-tional Journal of Indian Psychology, 3, 13–19.
39.
Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self‐control predicts good adjustment, less pa-thology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022....
40.
Taylor, J., & Wilson, J. C. (2016). Failing time after time: time perspective, procrastination, and cognitive reap-praisal in goal failure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46, 557–564.
41.
Verbruggen, F., Logan, G. D., & Stevens, M. A. (2008). STOP-IT: Windows executable software for the stop-signal paradigm. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 479–483.
42.
Worrell, F. C., & Mello, Z. R. (2007). The reliability and validity of Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory Scores in academically talented adolescents. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316....
43.
Zajenkowski, M., Stolarski, M., Maciantowicz, O., Malesza, M., & Witowska, J. (2016a). Time to be smart: Un-covering a complex interplay between intelligence and time perspective. Intelligence, 58, 1–9.
44.
Zajenkowski, M., Stolarski, M., Witowska, J., Maciantowicz, O., & Łowicki, P. (2016b). Fluid intelligence as a mediator of the relationship between executive control and balanced time perspective. Frontiers in Psy-chology, 7, 1844.
45.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288.
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2353-561X |
| ISSN: | 2353-4192 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
