RESEARCH PAPER
Temperaments and characters: incompatible or complementary components for criterion B of the alternative model in predicting DSM-5 section II personality disorders?
| 1 | University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran |
| 2 | University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States |
| 3 | Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran |
Submission date: 2020-07-07
Final revision date: 2021-01-19
Acceptance date: 2021-01-22
Online publication date: 2021-03-01
Publication date: 2021-03-31
Current Issues in Personality Psychology 2021;9(1):1–13
KEYWORDS
PID-5Temperament and Character InventoryAlternative Model for Personality Disorderstemperament and character inventoryalternative model for personality disorders
TOPICS
individual differencespersonality disordersbiosocial bases of personalitypersonality assessment and diagnosis
ABSTRACT
Background:
Many studies have found clear correspondence among the domains of the five-factor model of personality (FFM) and the alter-native model of personality disorders (AMPD) in DSM-5-III, which is assessed with the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). However, very few studies have compared the PID-5 with the other well-known established dimensional models of personality such as Cloninger’s model. The present study examined whether the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI-125) dimensions, PID-5 dimensions, or a combination would represent PD-scale scores more accurately.
Participants and procedure:
In this regard, 437 college students completed the Persian version of the PID-5, TCI-125 and SCID-II Screening Questionnaire.
Results:
The results indicated that cooperativeness (low), self-directedness (low), and self-transcendence (high) characters of the TCI-125 and the psychoticism (high) domain of the PID-5 are the most consistent predictors of all PD-scale scores.
Conclusions:
Overall, the findings showed that an integrative model, combining dimensions of the TCI-125 and PID-5, represented the fea-tures of PD-scale scores most effectively.
Many studies have found clear correspondence among the domains of the five-factor model of personality (FFM) and the alter-native model of personality disorders (AMPD) in DSM-5-III, which is assessed with the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). However, very few studies have compared the PID-5 with the other well-known established dimensional models of personality such as Cloninger’s model. The present study examined whether the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI-125) dimensions, PID-5 dimensions, or a combination would represent PD-scale scores more accurately.
Participants and procedure:
In this regard, 437 college students completed the Persian version of the PID-5, TCI-125 and SCID-II Screening Questionnaire.
Results:
The results indicated that cooperativeness (low), self-directedness (low), and self-transcendence (high) characters of the TCI-125 and the psychoticism (high) domain of the PID-5 are the most consistent predictors of all PD-scale scores.
Conclusions:
Overall, the findings showed that an integrative model, combining dimensions of the TCI-125 and PID-5, represented the fea-tures of PD-scale scores most effectively.
REFERENCES (50)
1.
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. APA.
2.
Amini, M., Pourshahbaz, A., Mohammadkhani, P., Ardakani, M. R. K., Lotfi, M., & Ramezani, M. A. (2015). The relationship between five-factor model and diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder-personality traits on patients with antisocial personality disorder. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 20, 470–476. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-1....
3.
Anderson, J., Snider, S., Sellbom, M., Krueger, R., & Hopwood, C. (2014). A comparison of the DSM-5.
4.
Section II and Section III personality disorder structures. Psychiatry Research, 216, 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyc....
5.
Ball, S. A., Tennen, H., Poling, J. C., Kranzler, H. R., & Rounsaville, B. J. (1997). Personality, temperament, and character dimensions and the DSM-IV personality disorders in substance abusers. Journal of Abnormal Psy-chology, 106, 545–553. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-8....
6.
Clark, L. A. (1993). Manual for the schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality. University of Minneso-ta Press.
7.
Clark, L. A. (2005). Temperament as a unifying basis for personality and psychopathology. Journal of Abnor-mal Psychology, 114, 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-8....
8.
Clark, L. A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging recon-ceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 227–257. https://doi.org/10.1146/annure....
9.
Clark, L. A., Simms, L. J., Wu, K. D., & Casillas, A. (2014). Manual for the schedule for nonadaptive and adap-tive personality (SNAP-2). University of Notre Dame.
10.
Clark, L. A., Vanderbleek, E. N., Shapiro, J. L., Nuzum, H., Allen, X., Daly, E., Kingsbury, T. J., Oiler, M., & Ro, E. (2015). The brave new world of personality disorder-trait specified: Effects of additional definitions on cov-erage, prevalence, and comorbidity. Psychopathology Review, 2, 52–82. https://doi.org/10.5127/pr.036....
11.
Cloninger, C. R. (1994). The temperament and character inventory (TCI): a guide to its development and use. Center for Psychobiology of Personality, Washington University.
12.
Cloninger, C. R. (2000). A practical way to diagnosis personality disorder: a proposal. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2....
13.
Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and char-acter. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 975–990. https://doi.org/10.1001/archps....
14.
De Caluwé, E., Verbeke, L., Aken, M. V., Heijden, P. T. V. D., & Clercq, B. D. (2019). The DSM-5.
15.
trait measure in a psychiatric sample of late adolescents and emerging adults: Structure, reliability, and valid-ity. Journal of Personality Disorders, 33, 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2....
16.
De Fruyt, F., Van De Wiele, L., & Van Heeringen, C. (2000). Cloninger’s psychobiological model of tempera-ment and character and the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-....
17.
de la Rie, S. M., Duijsens, I. J., & Cloninger, C. R. (1998). Temperament, character, and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 12, 362–372. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1....
18.
Dereboy, C., Güzel, H. S., Dereboy, F., Okyay, P., & Eskin, M. (2013). Personality disorders in a community sample in Turkey: Prevalence, associated risk factors, temperament and character dimensions. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 60, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/002076....
19.
Farmer, R. F., & Goldberg, L. R. (2008). A psychometric evaluation of the revised Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI-R) and the TCI-140. Psychological Assessment, 20, 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00129....
20.
First, M. B., Gibbon, M., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Benjamin, L. S. (1997). User’s guide for the Struc-tured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II personality disorders: SCID-II. American Psychiatric Press.
21.
García, L. F., Cuevas, L., Lucas, I., & Aluja, A. (2020). Comparing the prediction of dimensional personality disorders (PID-5) after three personality trait models: Five factor, Zuckerman, and Cloninger models. Euro-pean Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5....
22.
Gutiérrez, F., Sangorrín, J., Martín-Santos, R., Torres, X., & Torrens, M. (2002). Measuring the core features of personality disorders in substance abusers using the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI). Journal of Personality Disorders, 16, 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1....
23.
Hopwood, C. J., Thomas, K. M., Markon, K. E., Wright, A. G. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). DSM-5 personality traits and DSM-IV personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 424–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00266....
24.
Jopp, A. M., & South, S. C. (2014). Investigating the personality inventory for DSM-5 using self and spouse re-ports. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29, 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2....
25.
Kaviani, H. (2009). Normative data on Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): Complimentary findings. Tehran University Medical Journal, 67, 262–266.
26.
Kendler, K. S. (2009). An historical framework for psychiatric nosology. Psychological Medicine, 39, 1935–1941. https://doi.org/10.1017/S00332....
27.
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890. https://doi.org/10.1017/S00332....
28.
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2013). The personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). APA.
29.
Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2006). Reinterpreting comorbidity: a model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2, 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1146/annure....
30.
Livesley, W. J., & Jackson, D. (2009). Manual for the dimensional assessment of personality pathology – basic questionnaire. Sigma.
31.
Maggini, C., Ampollini, P., Marchesi, C., Gariboldi, S., & Cloninger, C. R. (2000). Relationships between Tridi-mensional Personality Questionnaire dimensions and DSM-III-R personality traits in Italian adolescents. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 4, 426–431. https://doi.org/10.1053/comp.2....
32.
Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personali-ty: an integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3....
33.
Miller, J. D., McCain, J., Lynam, D. R., Few, L. R., Gentile, B., MacKillop, J., & Campbell, W. K. (2014). A com-parison of the criterion validity of popular measures of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder via the use of expert ratings. Psychological Assessment, 26, 958–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00366....
34.
Miller, J. D., Reynolds, S. K., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2004). The validity of the five-factor model prototypes for per-sonality disorders in two clinical samples. Psychological Assessment, 16, 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3....
35.
Mohammadkhani, P., Jokar, M., Jahani-Tabesh, O., & Tamannaei-Far, S. (2011). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II personality disorders (Persian version). Danjeh.
36.
Morey, L. C. (2017). Application of the DSM-5 level of Personality Functioning Scale by Lay Raters. Journal of Personality Disorders, 32, 709–720. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2....
37.
Naseh, M. P., & Kaviani, H. (2005). Validation of Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) in Iranian sample: normative data. Tehran University Medical Journal, 63, 89–98.
38.
Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2017). Kaplan and Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry. Wolters Kluwer Health.
39.
Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.....
40.
Saulsman, L. M., & Page, A. C. (2004). The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: a meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1055–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.....
41.
Skodol, A. E., Bender, D. S., Oldham, J. M., Clark, L. A., Morey, L. C., Verheul, R., Krueger, R. F., & Siever, L. J. (2011). Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5 Part II: Clinical application. Personality Disorders, 2, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00218....
42.
Stepp, S. D., Yu, L., Miller, J. D., Hallquist, M. N., Trull, T. J., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2012). Integrating competing di-mensional models of personality: Linking the SNAP, TCI, and NEO using item response theory. Personality Disorders, 3, 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00259....
43.
Svrakic, M. D., Draganic, S., Hill, K., Bayon, C., Przybeck, T. R., & Cloninger, C. R. (2002). Temperament, char-acter, and personality disorders: Etiologic, diagnostic, treatment issues. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 106, 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600....
44.
Svrakic, M. D., Whitehead, C., Przybeck, R. T., & Cloninger, C. R. (1993). Differential diagnosis of personality disorders by the seven-factor model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 991–999. https://doi.org/10.1001/archps....
45.
Trull, T. J., & Durrett, C. A. (2005). Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1146/annure....
46.
Tyrer, P. (2005). The problem of severity in the classification of personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2....
47.
Watson, D., Stasik, S. M., Ro, E., & Clark, L. A. (2013). Integrating normal and pathological personality: Relat-ing the DSM-5 trait-dimensional model to general traits of personality. Assessment, 20, 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319....
48.
Widiger, T. A., Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2002). A proposal for Axis II: Diagnosing personality disorders using the five-factor model. In P. T. Costa, Jr. & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (pp. 431–456). American Psychological Association.
49.
Widiger, T. A., Livesley, W. J., & Clark, L. A. (2009). An integrative dimensional classification of personality disorder. Psychological Assessment, 21, 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00166....
50.
Widiger, T. A., & Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1....
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.