RESEARCH PAPER
Relation of inmates’ entitlement to identification with criminal groups, narcissism and readiness for self-improvement
1
Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
Submission date: 2019-02-05
Final revision date: 2019-03-25
Acceptance date: 2019-07-06
Online publication date: 2019-10-21
Publication date: 2019-11-04
Current Issues in Personality Psychology 2019;7(3):252-263
KEYWORDS
entitlementnarcissismCriminal Social Identityself–improvementinmatescriminal social identityself-improvement
TOPICS
the role of personality in interpersonal relations and social behaviorspersonality and behavior dynamics
ABSTRACT
Background:
Inmates often show narcissistic and entitlement attitudes, as expressed in their numerous unjustified com-plaints and lawsuits concerning the conditions of imprisonment. The aim of the study was to examine the rela-tionship between entitlement, criminal social identity, narcissism and readiness for self-improvement in a group of inmates. The study also attempted to create a psychological profile of prisoners with different levels of entitlement.
Participants and procedure:
The study included 87 prisoners (M = 32.10, SD = 8.49) aged 20-57 years. The Measure of Criminal Social Identity, Readiness for Self-Improvement Questionnaire, Entitlement Questionnaire, and Narcissistic Admira-tion and Rivalry Questionnaire were used in the study.
Results:
The results of the analyses indicate that entitlement in the study group is high. Active entitlement is positively associated with readiness to improve oneself, readiness to take care of one’s health and admiration. Passive entitlement is negatively associated with cognitive centrality, in-group affect, and narcissism, and negatively associated with readiness to improve oneself and readiness to take care of one’s health. Revenge entitlement is positively associated with criminal social identity, narcissism and rivalry. Inmates with a high and low level of entitlement are differentiated by psychological and demographic variables.
Conclusions:
When searching for factors determining the entitlement in a group of inmates, their personality and demo-graphic variables should be taken into account.
Inmates often show narcissistic and entitlement attitudes, as expressed in their numerous unjustified com-plaints and lawsuits concerning the conditions of imprisonment. The aim of the study was to examine the rela-tionship between entitlement, criminal social identity, narcissism and readiness for self-improvement in a group of inmates. The study also attempted to create a psychological profile of prisoners with different levels of entitlement.
Participants and procedure:
The study included 87 prisoners (M = 32.10, SD = 8.49) aged 20-57 years. The Measure of Criminal Social Identity, Readiness for Self-Improvement Questionnaire, Entitlement Questionnaire, and Narcissistic Admira-tion and Rivalry Questionnaire were used in the study.
Results:
The results of the analyses indicate that entitlement in the study group is high. Active entitlement is positively associated with readiness to improve oneself, readiness to take care of one’s health and admiration. Passive entitlement is negatively associated with cognitive centrality, in-group affect, and narcissism, and negatively associated with readiness to improve oneself and readiness to take care of one’s health. Revenge entitlement is positively associated with criminal social identity, narcissism and rivalry. Inmates with a high and low level of entitlement are differentiated by psychological and demographic variables.
Conclusions:
When searching for factors determining the entitlement in a group of inmates, their personality and demo-graphic variables should be taken into account.
REFERENCES (56)
1.
Adams, C. J., & Krasnoff, A. G. (1989). Social desirability effects in male prisoners. Journal of Re-search in Personality, 23, 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6....
2.
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscov-ering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/009385....
3.
Back, M. D., Küfner, A. C. P., Dufner, M., Gerlach, T. M., Rauthmann, J. F., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00344....
4.
Baumeister, R. F., Twenge, J. M., & Nuss, C. K. (2002). Effects of social exclusion on cognitive pro-cesses: Anticipated aloneness reduces intelligent thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology, 83, 817–827. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3....
5.
Bayse, D. J., Allgood, S. M., & Van Wyk, P. C. (1992). Locus of control, narcissism, and family life education in correctional rehabilitation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 17, 47–64. https://doi.org/ 10.1300/J076v17n03_03.
6.
Bishop, J., & Lane, R. C. (2002). The dynamics and dangers of entitlement. Psychoanalytic Psycholo-gy, 19, 739–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9....
7.
Boduszek, D., Adamson, G., Shevlin, M., Hyland, P., & Bourke, A. (2013). The role of criminal social identity in the relationship between criminal friends and criminal thinking style within a sample of re-cidivistic prisoners. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 23, 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/109113....
8.
Boduszek, D., & Debowska, A. (2017). Further insights into the construct of criminal social identity: Validation of a revised measure in a prison population. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 28, 694–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/147899....
9.
Bond, G. D., & Lee, A. Y. (2005). Language of lies in prison: linguistic classification of prisoners’ truthful and deceptive natural language. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.10....
10.
Campbell, W. K., & Foster, J. D. (2007). The narcissistic self: Background, an extended agency mod-el, and ongoing controversies. In C. Sedikides & S. J. Spencer (Eds.), The self (pp. 115–138). New York: Psychology Press.
11.
Dempsey, M. (2013). Preparing today’s youths to be tomorrow’s soldiers. Corrections Today, 75, 86.
12.
DeWall, C. N., & Baumeister, R. F. (2006). Alone but feeling no pain: Effects of social exclusion on physical pain tolerance and pain threshold, affective forecasting, and interpersonal empathy. Jour-nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3....
13.
DeWall, C. N., Twenge, J. M., Gitter, S. A., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). It’s the thought that counts: The role of hostile cognition in shaping aggressive responses to social exclusion. Journal of Per-sonality and Social Psychology, 96, 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00131....
14.
Falardeau, M., Morin, J., & Bellemare, J. (2015). The perspective of young prisoners on their occupa-tions. Journal of Occupational Science, 22, 334–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/144275....
15.
Fisher, S., Hall, G., & Beven, J. (2008). Dionysius’s brutal sense of entitlement: Plato’s contribution to criminogenic needs. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 451–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/106831....
16.
Fisher, S., & Hall, G. (2011). “If you show a bit of violence they learn real quick”: Measuring entitle-ment in violent offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 18, 588–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/132187....
17.
Freud, S. (1916/1963). Some character types met with in psychoanalytic work. In J. Stratchey (Ed.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (pp. 311–333). Lon-don: Hoghart Press.
18.
Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., Turner, J. C., & Onorato, S. (1995). Contextual changes in the prototypicality of extreme and moderate out-group members. European Journal of Social Psy-chology, 25, 509–530. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2....
19.
Hepper, E. G., Hart, C. M., Meek, R., Cisek, S., & Sedikides, C. (2014). Narcissism and empathy in young offenders and non‐offenders. European Journal of Personality, 28, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.19....
20.
Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 5, 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327....
21.
Hosser, D., Windzio, M., & Greve, W. (2008). Guilt and shame as predictors of recidivism: A longitu-dinal study with young prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/009385....
22.
Jastrzębska, M., Pastwa-Wojciechowska, B., & Piotrowski, A. (2017). Pessimism or optimism thera-py, which is a result of changes in the treatment of alcohol dependence in prisons among people with psychopathic personality traits. Miscellanea Anthropologica et Sociologica, 18, 42–67.
23.
Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
24.
Miller, J. D., Maples, J. L., Buffardi, L., Cai, H., Gentile, B., Kisbu–Sakarya, Y., Kwan, V. S., LoPila-to, A., Pendry, L. F., Sedikides, C., Siedor, L., & Campbell, W. K. (2015). Narcissism and United States’ culture: The view from home and around the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology, 109, 1068–1089. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00395....
25.
Mills, J. F., & Kroner, D. G. (1999). Measures of criminal attitudes and associates. Unpublished User Guide. Selby: Canada.
26.
Ministry of Justice (2016). Information on the way of accepting and handling complaints and applica-tions addressed to the Ministry of Justice and the Prison Service in 2016. Warszawa: Ministry of Jus-tice.
27.
Pastwa-Wojciechowska, B., & Piotrowski, A. (2016). Personality determinants of the effectiveness of the Prison Service. Polish Journal of Social Rehabilitation, 12, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.22432/pjsr.....
28.
Pechorro, P., Braga, T., Kahn, R. E., Gonçalves, R. A., & Delisi, M. (2018). A retrospective study on how psychopathic traits differentiate recidivists from first-time female youth offenders in juvenile detention centers. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research & Practice, 18, 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/247328....
29.
Piotrowski, A. (2011). Kwestionariusz Stresu Służby Więziennej. Podręcznik [Prison’s Service Stress Questionnaire. Manual]. Warszawa: Difin.
30.
Piotrowski, A. (2014). Funkcjonariusze Służby Więziennej wobec aktualnej populacji osadzonych [Of-ficers of the Prison Service against the current population of prisoners]. Przegląd Naukowo-Metodyczny. Edukacja dla Bezpieczeństwa, 3, 279–300.
31.
Piotrowski, A. (2018). Self-evaulation of personal physical health, accidents while performing duty and preventive treatment of stress in Prison Service. Medycyna Pracy, 69, 425–438. https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.58....
32.
Piotrowski, A., & Baran, M. (2016). International experience of the prison system in Poland: A country of recent political transformation. International Psychology Bulletin, 20, 75–77.
33.
Piotrowski, A., & Jurek, P. (2019). A preliminary adaptation and validation of the Overwork Climate Scale by Mazzetti, Schaufeli, Guglielmi and Depolo. Medycyna Pracy, 70, 177–188. https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.58....
34.
Pospiszyl, K. (2002). Narcyzm u przestępców seksualnych [Narcissism among sexual offenders]. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 45, 197–208.
35.
Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Invento-ry and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 890–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022‐3....
36.
Rogoza, R., Rogoza, M., & Wyszyńska, P. (2016). Polska adaptacja modelu narcystycznego podziwu i rywalizacji [Polish adaptation of the narcissistic admiration and rivalry concept]. Polskie Forum Psychologiczne, 21, 410–431. https://doi.org/10.14656/PFP20....
37.
Sedekides, C., & Strube, M. J. (1997). Self-evaluation: to thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, and to thine own self be better. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 209–269). New York: Academic Press.
38.
Sleep, C. E., Sellbom, M., Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. (2017). Narcissism and response validity: Do individuals with narcissistic features underreport psychopathology? Psychological Assessment, 29, 1059–1064. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas000....
39.
Symington, N. (1993/2013). Narcyzm. Nowa teoria [Narcissism. New theory]. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Imago.
40.
Szalkowska, A., Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M., & Clinton, A. (2015). Entitlement and organizational behav-iors: the moderating role of narcissism. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 3, 230–241. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2....
41.
Szulc, M., & Parchem, K. (2014). Struktura wartości i poczucie koherencji wolontariuszy medycznych [The structure of values and sense of coherence hospice volunteers]. Medycyna Paliatywna, 2, 89–94.
42.
Szulc, M., & Pawlewicz, P. (2015). Potrzeba poszukiwania doznań u młodzieży niedostosowanej spo-łecznie [The need to search for sensations in socially maladjusted youth]. Przegląd Naukowo-Metodyczny. Edukacja dla Bezpieczeństwa, 4, 335–347.
43.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
44.
Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., Furukawa, E., Kopelovich, S., Meyer, P. J., & Cosby, B. (2012). Reliabil-ity, validity, and predictive utility of the 25-item Criminogenic Cognitions Scale (CCS). Criminal Jus-tice and Behavior, 39, 1340–1360. https://doi.org/10.1177/009385....
45.
Tennen, M., Affleck, G., & Greshman, K. (1986). Self-blame among parents of infants prenatal com-plications: the role of self-protective motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 690–696. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3....
46.
Tripodi, S. J. (2014). Emphasis on rehabilitation: From inmates to employees. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 891–893. https://doi.org/10.1177/030662....
47.
Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Bartels, J. M. (2007). Social ex-clusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3....
48.
Walters, G. D. (2001). Revised validity scales for the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 32, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v3....
49.
Walters, G. D., Deming, A., & Casbon, T. (2015). Predicting recidivism in sex offenders with the Psy-chological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). Assessment, 22, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319....
50.
Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person- and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/104632....
51.
Yochelson, S., & Samenow, S. E. (1976). The criminal personality (Vol. 1): A profile for change. New York: Jason Aronson.
52.
Yu, S. V., Sung, H. E., Mellow, J., & Koenigsmann, C. J. (2015). Self-perceived health improvements among prison inmates. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 21, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/107834....
53.
Yu, J. T. A. (2016). The prevalence of criminal thinking in a substance abuse treatment-seeking male incarcerated population. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineer-ing. ProQuest Information & Learning.
54.
Zawadzka, A. M., & Szabowska-Walaszczyk, A. (2011). Z czym się wiąże motyw samonaprawy? Ko-relaty gotowości do samonaprawy [What is self-improvement motive about? Selected determinants of readiness for self-improvement analysis]. Psychologia Jakości Życia, 10, 7–24.
55.
Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M. (2016). Wyznaczniki i konsekwencje roszczeniowości w perspektywie (mię-dzy)kulturowej [The determinants and consequences of the entitlement in the intercultural perspec-tive]. Warszawa: Scholar.
56.
Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M. A., Piotrowski, J. P., Cieciuch, J., Calogero, R. M., Van Hiel, A., Argente-ro, P., … & Wills-Herrera, E. (2017). Measurement of psychological entitlement in 28 countries. Eu-ropean Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33, 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5....
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2353-561X |
| ISSN: | 2353-4192 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
