SHORT REPORT
Disentangling the Relationship Between Machiavellianism and Social Dominance Orientation
1
University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
Submission date: 2023-07-10
Final revision date: 2024-05-10
Acceptance date: 2024-06-10
Online publication date: 2024-10-01
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
the role of personality in interpersonal relations and social behaviorsindividual differencespersonality and politics
ABSTRACT
Background:
Machiavellianism and social dominance orientation are two constructs associated with socially undesirable behavior and predictors of prejudice; however, their relationship has mainly been investigated through measures that only assess the antagonism dimension of Machiavellianism. Thus, this study aimed to disentangle their relationship using an instrument assessing agency and planfulness.
Participants and procedure:
Participants were 767 Brazilians aged 18 to 71 (M = 30.10, SD = 10.60), most identified as women (67.7%) and assessed using the Five Factor Machiavellianism Inventory, the Short Dark Triad, and the Social Dominance Orientation Scale. A path model was used, where the Machiavellianism and the Dark Triad dimensions predicted social dominance orientation.
Results:
The results suggest that antagonism was indeed the primary and only dimension of Machiavellianism to predict dominance and antiegalitarianism, while agency and planfulness were non-significant.
Conclusions:
The findings suggest that socially dominant traits have their roots in antagonism, showing no interaction with planning and impulse control.
Machiavellianism and social dominance orientation are two constructs associated with socially undesirable behavior and predictors of prejudice; however, their relationship has mainly been investigated through measures that only assess the antagonism dimension of Machiavellianism. Thus, this study aimed to disentangle their relationship using an instrument assessing agency and planfulness.
Participants and procedure:
Participants were 767 Brazilians aged 18 to 71 (M = 30.10, SD = 10.60), most identified as women (67.7%) and assessed using the Five Factor Machiavellianism Inventory, the Short Dark Triad, and the Social Dominance Orientation Scale. A path model was used, where the Machiavellianism and the Dark Triad dimensions predicted social dominance orientation.
Results:
The results suggest that antagonism was indeed the primary and only dimension of Machiavellianism to predict dominance and antiegalitarianism, while agency and planfulness were non-significant.
Conclusions:
The findings suggest that socially dominant traits have their roots in antagonism, showing no interaction with planning and impulse control.
REFERENCES (17)
1.
Anderson, J., & Cheers, C. (2020). Does the dark triad predict prejudice? The role of Machiavellianism, psychopa-thy, and narcissism in explaining negativity toward asylum seekers. Australian Psychologist, 53, 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.122....
2.
Berry, C. M. (2023). A critical examination and meta-analysis of the distinction between the dominance and an-tiegalitarianism facets of social dominance orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124, 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp00....
3.
Collison, K. L., Vize, C. E., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2018). Development and preliminary validation of a five factor model measure of Machiavellianism. Psychological Assessment, 30, 1401–1407. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas000....
4.
Giger, J. C., Orgambídez-Ramos, A., Gonçalves, G., Santos, J., & Gomes, A. (2015). Evidências métricas da adaptação da Escala de Dominância Social numa amostra portuguesa [Metric evidence of the adaptation of the Social Dominance Scale in a Portuguese sample]. Avaliação Psicológica, 14, 143–151. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.20....
5.
Grabovac, B., & Dinić, B. M. (2022). “The devil in disguise”: a test of Machiavellianism instruments (the Mach-IV, the Machiavellian Personality Scale, and the Five Factor Machiavellianism Inventory). Primenjena Psihologija, 15, 327–353. https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.v1....
6.
Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Levin, S., Thomsen, L., Kteily, N., & Sheehy-Skeffington, J. (2012). Social domi-nance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 583–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616....
7.
Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., Foels, R., & Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi00....
8.
Hodson, G., Hogg, S. M., & MacInnis, C. C. (2009). The role of “dark personalities” (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy), Big Five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudice. Journal of Research in Per-sonality, 43, 686–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.....
9.
Jarmakowski-Kostrzanowski, T., & Radkiewicz, P. (2021). Social dominance orientation predicts lower moral con-demnation of causing harm to animals. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 9, 229–236. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2....
10.
Jones, D. N., & Figueredo, A. J. (2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the Dark Triad.
12.
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319....
13.
Kückelhaus, B., Kranefeld, I., & Blickle, G. (2022). Nonlinearity within dark triad constructs? The case for psy-chopathy and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 190, 111521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid....
14.
Monteiro, R. P. (2017). Tríade sombria da personalidade: Conceitos, medição e correlatos (Tese de doutorado) [Dark triad personality: Concepts, measurement, and correlates (Doctoral thesis)]. Federal University of Paraíba. Re-trieved from https://repositorio.ufpb.br/js....
15.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: a personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3....
16.
Rauthmann, J. F., & Will, T. (2011). Proposing a multidimensional Machiavellianism conceptualization. Social Be-havior and Personality, 39, 391–404. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.20....
17.
Sharpe, B. M., Collison, K. L., Lynam, D. R., & Miller, J. D. (2021). Does Machiavellianism meaningfully differ from psychopathy? It depends. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 39, 663–677. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.25....
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
| eISSN: | 2353-561X |
| ISSN: | 2353-4192 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
