Are the dark personalities sincere? Connections between the Dark Triad and the Big Three
More details
Hide details
Forensic Psychology Unit, Center for Applied Psychology, Department of Health Psychology, Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, Spain
Psychology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Murcia, Spain
Submission date: 2023-01-20
Final revision date: 2023-05-11
Acceptance date: 2023-07-19
Online publication date: 2023-09-14
Corresponding author
David Pineda   

Forensic Psychology Unit, Center for Applied Psychology, Department of Health Psychology, Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, Spain
There are different theories and models of personality. In the antisocial area, the model used is the Dark Triad, a model of personality composed of the traits of Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism. The links between the Dark Triad and other general models have been widely studied; however, there is little research connecting it with the traditional, but still used, model of personality described by Eysenck (psychoticism, extraversion, and neuroticism). Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the connections between the Dark Triad of personality and Eysenck’s personality model. Addi-tionally, we interpret the connections between the sincerity scale of Eysenck’s model and the Dark Triad.

Participants and procedure:
Our final sample was composed of 2385 participants who completed different personality questionnaires measuring the Dark Triad and Eysenck’s model. Bivariate analyses and structural equation modelling were performed.

Narcissism and Machiavellianism have positive connections with neuroticism and extraversion, whereas psychopathy is positively associated with psychoticism and negatively associated with extraversion. All the Dark Triad traits, mainly Machiavellianism, show the strongest connections with sincerity.

Considering the deceptive and manipulative nature of the Dark Triad, these results would imply that these traits could be mismeasured in some contexts. However, in research conditions those people who score higher on the Dark Tetrad traits do not hide behaviours that tend to be socially undesirable, implying some degree of honesty in their answers. Further efforts to develop more objective measures, such as implicit, indirect, task-based, or forced-choice measures, should be considered.

Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. Reinhart & Winston.
Althubaiti, A. (2016). Information bias in health research: Definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 9, 211–217.
Andrews, P., & Meyer, R. G. (2003). Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale and short Form C: Forensic norms. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59, 483–492.
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 327–353.
Baughman, H. M., Jonason, P. K., Lyons, M., & Vernon, P. A. (2014). Liar liar pants on fire: Cheater strategies linked to the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 35–38.
Cale, E. M. (2006). A quantitative review of the relations between the “Big 3” higher order personality dimensions and antisocial behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 250–284.
Carré, J. R., Jones, D. N., & Mueller, S. M. (2020). Perceiving opportunities for legal and illegal profit: Machiavelli-anism and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 162, 109942.
Curtis, S. R., & Jones, D. N. (2020). Understanding what makes dark traits “vulnerable”: a distinction between in-difference and hostility. Personality and Individual Differences, 160, 109941.
Echeburúa, E., Muñoz, J. M., & Loinaz, I. (2011). La evaluación psicológica forense frente a la evaluación clínica: Propuestas y retos de futuro [Forensic psychological assessment versus clinical assessment: Proposals and challenges for the future]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 11, 141–159.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. Hodder & Stoughton.
Fehr, B., Samsom, D., & Paulhus, D. (1992). The construct of Machiavellianism: Twenty years later. In C. D. Spiel-berger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 9, pp. 77–116). Lawrence Erlbaum Asso-ciates.
Francis, L. J., Brown, L. B., & Philipchalk, R. (1992). The development of an abbreviated form of the Revised Ey-senck Personality Questionnaire (EPQR-A): Its use among students in England, Canada, the U.S.A. and Austral-ia. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 443–449.
Fronczyk, K., & Witkowska, E. (2020). Social desirability dimensionality: One or two continua? Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 8, 229–242.
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34.
Hare, R. D. (1999). Without conscience. The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. The Guilford Press.
Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: a concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological As-sessment, 22, 420–432.
Kajonius, P. J., Persson, B. N., Rosenberg, P., & Garcia, D. (2016). The (mis)measurement of the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen: Exploitation at the core of the scale. PeerJ, 2016, 1–21.
Kayiş, A. R., & Akcaoğlu, M. Ö. (2021). Big Five and Dark Triad personality traits as predictors of multicultural attitude and efficacy. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 9, 215–228.
Kowalski, C. M., Rogoza, R., Vernon, P. A., & Schermer, J. A. (2018). The Dark Triad and the self-presentation var-iables of socially desirable responding and self-monitoring. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 234–237.
Mohammadzadeh, A., & Ashouri, A. (2018). Comparison of personality correlates of Machiavellianism, narcissism and psychopathy (dark triad of personality) in three factor personality model. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 24, 44–55.
Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Otgaar, H., & Meijer, E. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: a meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the Dark Triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Per-spectives on Psychological Science, 12, 183–204.
O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., Story, P. A., & White, C. D. (2015). A meta-analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the Dark Triad and five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 83, 644–664.
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psy-chopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.
Peters, E. M., Bowen, R., & Balbuena, L. (2020). Mood instability and trait anxiety as distinct components of Ey-senckian neuroticism with differential relations to impulsivity and risk taking. Journal of Personality Assess-ment, 102, 337–347.
Pineda, D., Galán, M., Martínez-Martínez, A., Andrés-Prades, P. J., García-Barceló, N., Carbonell-Vayá, E. J., & González-Álvarez, J. L. (in press). Personality comparison between lethal and non-lethal intimate partner vio-lence perpetrators and their victims. Prevention Science.
Pineda, D., Sandín, B., & Muris, P. (2020). Psychometrics properties of the Spanish version of two Dark Triad scales: The Dirty Dozen and the Short Dark Triad. Current Psychology, 39, 1873–1881.
Raskin, R., & Hall, C. S. (1981). The narcissistic personality inventory: Alternate form reliability and further evi-dence of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 159–162.
Rogers, R., Vitacco, M. J., Jackson, R. L., Martin, M., Collins, M., & Sewell, K. W. (2002). Faking psychopathy? An examination of response styles with antisocial youth. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 31–46.
Sandín, B., Valiente, R. M., Olmedo Montes, M., Chorot, P., & Santed Germán, M. A. (2002). Versión española del cuestionario EPQR-Abreviado (EPQR-A) (II): replicación factorial, fiabilidad y validez [Spanish version of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQR-A) (II): Factor analysis replication, reliability and validity]. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 7, 207–216.
Santacreu, J., & Hernández, J. M. (2018). Theory of personality: an interactive behavioral approach. In V. Zeigler-Hill, & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 5379–5382). Springer.
Spaans, M., Molendijk, M. L., de Beurs, E., Rinne, T., & Spinhoven, P. (2017). Self-reported personality traits in forensic populations: a meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23, 56–78.
Trahair, C., MacDonald, K. B., Furnham, A., & Schermer, J. A. (2022). Altruism and the Dark Triad. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 10, 234–239.
Vigil-Colet, A., Ruiz-Pamies, M., Anguiano-Carrasco, C., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2012). The impact of social desirabil-ity on psychometric measures of aggression. Psicothema, 24, 310–315.
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top