Agentic and communal narcissism and subjective well-being: are narcissistic individuals unhappy? A research report
Online publication date: 2014-05-31
Current Issues in Personality Psychology 2014;2(1):10-16
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Background
The communal/agentic model of narcissism is well accepted in the current research literature (Gebauer, Sedikides, Verplanken & Maio, 2012). This model could be particularly useful in examining the relation between narcissism and hedonistic and eudaimonic subjective well-being (SWB; Deci & Ryan, 2008).
Participants and procedure
In an effort to examine the relationship between narcissism and SWB, correlational analyses of survey responses obtained from students (n = 138) were conducted. Agentic narcissism was measured using the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI; Raskin & Terry, 1988) and communal narcissism by the Communal Narcissism Inventory (CNI; Gebauer et al., 2012). Subjective well-being measures included the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS; Diener, Emmons, Larsen & Griffin, 1985), Positive And Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson, Clark & Tegellen, 1988), and the Social Well-being Scale (SWBS; Keyes, 1998). Self-esteem was included in the study in order to examine the potential mediating role of self-esteem in the relationship between narcissism and subjective well-being.
Results
Agentic narcissism was positively related to the affective component of SWB whereas communal narcissism was positively related to the cognitive component of SWB. Both forms of narcissism were positively related to social well-being. All relationships were mediated by the participant’s self-esteem level.
Conclusions
The results indicate that both agentic narcissism and communal narcissism are positively related to SWB. The results are discussed in the context of the agentic/communal model of narcissism (Gebauer et al., 2012) and hedonistic/eudaimonic well-being (Deci & Ryan, 2008).
The communal/agentic model of narcissism is well accepted in the current research literature (Gebauer, Sedikides, Verplanken & Maio, 2012). This model could be particularly useful in examining the relation between narcissism and hedonistic and eudaimonic subjective well-being (SWB; Deci & Ryan, 2008).
Participants and procedure
In an effort to examine the relationship between narcissism and SWB, correlational analyses of survey responses obtained from students (n = 138) were conducted. Agentic narcissism was measured using the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI; Raskin & Terry, 1988) and communal narcissism by the Communal Narcissism Inventory (CNI; Gebauer et al., 2012). Subjective well-being measures included the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS; Diener, Emmons, Larsen & Griffin, 1985), Positive And Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson, Clark & Tegellen, 1988), and the Social Well-being Scale (SWBS; Keyes, 1998). Self-esteem was included in the study in order to examine the potential mediating role of self-esteem in the relationship between narcissism and subjective well-being.
Results
Agentic narcissism was positively related to the affective component of SWB whereas communal narcissism was positively related to the cognitive component of SWB. Both forms of narcissism were positively related to social well-being. All relationships were mediated by the participant’s self-esteem level.
Conclusions
The results indicate that both agentic narcissism and communal narcissism are positively related to SWB. The results are discussed in the context of the agentic/communal model of narcissism (Gebauer et al., 2012) and hedonistic/eudaimonic well-being (Deci & Ryan, 2008).
REFERENCES (30)
2.
Bazińska, R. & Drat-Ruszczak, K. (2000). Struktura narcyzmu w polskiej adaptacji kwestionariusza NPI Ruskina i Hulla [The structure of narcissism in Polish adaptation of Raskin’s and Hall’s NPI]. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 6, 171-187.
3.
Bishop, J. & Lane, R.C. (2002). The dynamics and dangers of entitlement. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 19, 739-758.
4.
Brzozowski, P., Watson, D.B. & Clark, L.A. (2010). Skala uczuć pozytywnych i negatywnych SUPIN: polska adaptacja skali PANAS Davida Watsona i Lee Ann Clark: podręcznik [Scale of positive and negative affects SUPIN: Polish adaptation of PANAS by David Watson & Anna Clark]. Warszawa: PTP.
5.
Campbell, W.K., Bush, C.P., Brunell, A.B. & Shelton, J. (2005). Understanding the social costs of narcissism: The case of tragedy of the commons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1358-1368.
6.
Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 1-11.
7.
Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J. & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
8.
Emmons, R. (1984). Factor analysis and construct validity of Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 291-300.
9.
Emmons, R. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and Measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 11-17.
10.
Freud, S. (1914/1957). On narcissism: An introduction. In: J. Strachey (ed. & transl.). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 67-104). London: Hogarth Press.
11.
Gebauer, J.E., Sedikides, C., Verplanken, B. & Maio, G.R. (2012). Communal narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 854-878.
12.
International Wellbeing Group (2013). Personal Wellbeing Index: 5th Edition. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University.
13.
Juczyński, Z. (2001). Narzędzia pomiaru w promocji i psychologii zdrowia [Measurements for health psychology and health promotion]. Warsaw: PTP.
14.
Karaś, D., Najderska, M. & Cieciuch, J. (2013). Polish adaptation of Keyes`s Social Well-Being Inventory. I International Conference of Positive Psychology, Sopot, Poland.
15.
Kernberg, O. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson.
16.
Keyes, C.L.M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 121-140.
17.
Łaguna, M., Lachowicz-Tabaczek, K. & Dzwonkowska, I. (2007). Skala samooceny Morrisa Rosenberga – polska adaptacja metody [The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale – Polish adaptation of scale]. Psychologia Społeczna, 4, 164-176.
18.
Miller, J.D. & Campbell, W.K. (2008). Comparing Clinical and social-personality conceptualizations of narcissism. Journal of Personality, 76, 451-476.
19.
Miller, J.D., Campbell, W.K. & Pilkonis, P.A. (2007). Narcissistic personality disorder: Relations with distress and functional impairment. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 48, 170-177.
20.
Miller, J.D., Hoffman, B.J., Gaughan, E.T., Gentile, B., Maples, J. & Campbell, W.K. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79, 1013-1042.
21.
Preacher, K.J. & Hayes, A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
22.
Priffitera, A. & Ryan, J.J. (1984). Validity of Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) in a psychiatric sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1, 140-142.
23.
Raskin, R. & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890-902.
24.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
Ryan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudajmonic research. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166.
26.
Sedikides, C., Rudich, E., Gregg, A., Kumashiro, M. & Rusbult, C. (2004). Are normal narcissists psychologically healthy? Self-esteem matters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 400-416.
27.
Twenge, J. (2006). Generation me: Why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled-and more miserable than ever before. New York: Free Press.
28.
Twenge, J. & Campbell, W.K. (2009). The narcissism epidemic. Life in the age of entitlement. New York: Free Press.
29.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A. & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
30.
Wojciszke, B. & Abele, A. (2008). The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in communication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1139-1147.
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2353-561X |
| ISSN: | 2353-4192 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
