SHORT REPORT
Value structure and priorities: Other-report account
 
More details
Hide details
Submission date: 2017-09-12
Final revision date: 2017-10-03
Acceptance date: 2017-10-04
Online publication date: 2017-12-21
Publication date: 2018-09-01
 
Current Issues in Personality Psychology 2018;6(3):252–259
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background
The aim of this study was to examine the Schwartz model of values in other-report data. We specifically tested the circular structure and priorities of personal values observed in ratings made by well-acquainted informants.
Participants and procedure
We analysed self- and other-reports of preferences of 19 basic and four higher-order values provided by 422 participants (Mage = 30.02, SDage = 13.99) using the Portrait Value Questionnaire (PVQ-5x).
Results
The self-other agreement corrected for measurement bias ranged from .29 to .78 for basic values and from .51 to .67 for higher-order values. The findings indicated that basic values measured via other-reports form a circular structure consistent with the Schwartz theory. The hierarchy of values based on other-reports only slightly differed from the hierarchy based on self-reports.
Conclusions
The results suggest that both self- and other-ratings of personal values yield meaningful information that contributes to each.
 
REFERENCES (23)
1.
Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2014). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A Dual Perspective Model. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 50, pp. 195–255). doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7.
 
2.
Bilsky, W., Janik, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2011). The structural organization of human values – Evidence from three rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 759–776. doi: 10.1177/0022022110362757.
 
3.
Borg, I., Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2015). Does the value circle exist within persons or only across persons? Journal of Personality, 85, 151–162. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12228.
 
4.
Borg, I., Dobewall, H., & Aavik, T. (2016). Personal values and their structure under universal and lexical approaches. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.071.
 
5.
Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., Algesheimer, R., & Schmidt, P. (in press). Testing for approximate measurement invariance of human values in the European Social Survey. Sociological Methods & Research. doi: 10.1177/0049124117701478.
 
6.
Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., Vecchione, M., Beierlein, C., & Schwartz, S. H. (2014). The cross-national invariance properties of a new scale to measure 19 basic human values. A test across eight countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 764–779. doi: 10.1177/0022022114527348.
 
7.
Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092–1122. doi: 10.1037/a0021212.
 
8.
Connolly, J. J., Kavanagh, E. J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2007). The convergent validity between self and observer ratings of personality: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 110–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00371.x.
 
9.
Dobewall, H., Aavik, T., Konstabel, K., Schwartz, S. H., & Realo, A. (2014). A comparison of self-other agreement in personal values versus the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.01.004.
 
10.
Dobewall, H., & Aavik, T. (2016). Rank-order consistency and profile stability of self-and informant-reports of personal values in comparison to personality traits. Journal of Individual Differences, 37, 40–48. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000186.
 
11.
Döring, A. K., Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Groenen, P. J. F., Glatzel, J., Harasimczuk, J., …Bilsky, W. (2015). Cross-cultural evidence of value structures and priorities in childhood. British Journal of Psychology, 106, 675–699. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12116.
 
12.
Hitlin, S., & Piliavin, J. A. (2004). Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 359–393. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110640.
 
13.
Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Pozzebon, J. A., Bourdage, J. S., & Ogunfowora, B. (2009). Similarity and assumed similarity in personality reports of well-acquainted persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 460–472. doi: 10.1037/a0014059.
 
14.
Leising, D., Erbs, J., & Fritz, U. (2010). The letter of recommendation effect in informant ratings of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 668–682. doi: 10.1037/a0018771.
 
15.
McDonald, J. S., & Letzring, T. D. (2016). Judging personal values and personality traits: Accuracy and its relation to visibility. Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 140–151. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.10.009.
 
16.
Paunonen, S. V., & Hong, R. Y. (2013). The many faces of assumed similarity in perceptions of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 800–815. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.08.007.
 
17.
Rauthmann, J. F. (2017). What are other-rated scales composed of? Sources of measurement error and true trait variance in other-ratings of the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 45–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2017.05.002.
 
18.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1996). Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychological Methods, 1, 199–223.
 
19.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York, NY: Academic Press.
 
20.
Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 268–290. doi: 10.1177/0022022101032003002.
 
21.
Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., …Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663–688. doi: 10.1037/a0029393.
 
22.
Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the Theory of Basic Human Values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542. doi: 10.1177/0022022101032005001.
 
23.
Schwartz, S. H., Verkasalo, M., Antonovsky, A., & Sagiv, L. (1997). Value priorities and social desirability: Much substance, some style. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 3–18. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01115.x.
 
eISSN:2353-561X
ISSN:2353-4192