REVIEW PAPER
The analysis of change in behavior and development: on some errors and possibilities to correct them
| 1 | Institute of Psychology, Kazimierz Wielki University, Bydgoszcz, Poland |
| 2 | Institute of Psychology, The Cardinal Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland |
Submission date: 2015-12-04
Final revision date: 2016-04-19
Acceptance date: 2016-04-19
Online publication date: 2016-05-30
Publication date: 2016-06-30
Current Issues in Personality Psychology 2016;4(2):65–74
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
We aim to demonstrate that the understanding of behavior and development requires a better fit between methods to gather and analyze data and the dynamic nature of psychological phenomena. We argue that there are limits to the application of static designs of data collection in correlation design and to focusing on measures of central tendency when inferring on the complex processes of change in human behavior and development. We describe possible ways to correct the errors we make and to overcome the difficulties that we face when measuring change. We conclude that there is a need to identify a comprehensive model of gathering and analyzing data that takes into account the observation period of the phenomena (short- and long-term research), the complexity of the studied form of activity (elementary and complex) and the situation/context of the measurement (well-defined situation and situation “at large”).
REFERENCES (46)
1.
Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U., & Staudinger, U. (2006). Life span theory in developmental psychology. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 569–664). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
2.
Biesanz, J. C., West, S. G., & Kwok, O. M. (2003). Personality over time: Methodological approaches to the study of short-term and long-term development and change. Journal of Personality, 71, 905–941.
4.
Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ, US: Wiley.
5.
Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications and programming. New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
6.
Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Strycker, L. A. (2006). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
7.
Eliasz A., & Klonowicz T. (2003). Zewnętrzne i wewnętrzne czynniki destabilizujące system regulacji stymulacji [External and internal factors that destabilize the regulation and stimulation system]. Kolokwia Psychologiczne, 11, 109–134.
8.
Fischer, K. W., & Bidell, T. R. (2006). Dynamic development of action and thought. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 313–399). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
9.
Fischer, K. W., & Yan, Z. (2002). Darwin’s construction of the theory of evolution: microdevelopment of explanations of variation and change in species. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 294–318). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Flynn, J. R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 171–191.
11.
Gesell, A. (1946). The ontogenesis of infant behavior. In L. Carmicheal (ed.), Manual of child psychology (pp. 295–331). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
12.
Gotlieb, G. (2003). Probabilistic epigenesist of development. In J. Valsiner & K. J. Connoly (eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 3–17). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
13.
Granott, N., Fischer, K. W., & Parziale, J. (2002). Bridging to the unknown: A transition mechanism in learning and development. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 131–156). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Granott, N., & Parziale, J. (2002). Microdevelopment: A process-oriented perspective for studying development and learning. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 1–30). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Kuhn, D. (1995). Microgenetic study of change: What has it told us? Psychological Science, 6, 133–139.
16.
Kuhn, D. (2002). A multi-component system that constructs knowledge: Insight from microgenetic study. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 109–130). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Lee, K., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2002). Macro- and microdevelopmental research: Assumptions, research strategies, constraints, and utilities. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 243–268). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Lerner, R. M., & Hultsch, D. F. (1983). Human development: A life-span perspective. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.
19.
Lewin, K. (1931). The conflict between Aristotelian and Galileian modes of thought in contemporary psychology. Journal of General Psychology, 5, 141–177.
20.
Lewin, K. (1946). Behavior and development as a function of total situation. In L. Carmicheal (ed.), Manual of child psychology (pp. 791–844). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
21.
Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10, 21–39.
22.
Magnusson, D. (1998). The logic and implications of a person-oriented approach. In R. B. Carins, L. R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 33–62). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
23.
Magnusson, D., & Stattin, H. (2006). The person in context: a holistic-interactionistic approach. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (pp. 400–515). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
24.
McAdams, D. P. (1995). What do we know when we know a person? Journal of Personality, 63, 365–396.
25.
Molenaar, P. C. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2002). The relationship between the structure of inter-individual and intra-individual variability: A theoretical and empirical indication of developmental system theory. In U. M. Staudinger & U. Linderberger (eds.), Understanding human development (pp. 339–360). Dordrecht: Kluwer Press.
26.
Nosek, B. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349 (6251).
27.
Nowak A., & Vallacher R. R. (1998). Dynamical social psychology. New York, London: The Guilford Press.
28.
Olejnik, M. (2011). Średnia dorosłość [Middle-adulthood]. In J. Trempała (ed.), Psychologia rozwoju człowieka [Psychology of human development] (pp. 312–327). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
30.
bowości [Introduction to Psychology of Personality]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
31.
Piaget, J. (1977). Psychologia i epistemologia [Psychology and epistemology]. Warsaw: PWN.
32.
Raven, J. (2000). The Raven’s Progressive Matrices: change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 1–48.
33.
Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25.
34.
Schaie, K. W. (1965). A general model for study of developmental problems. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 133–141.
35.
Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children’s thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
Siegler, R. S. (2006). Microgenetic analyses of learning. Dynamic development of action and thought. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 2. Theoretical models of human development (pp. 464–510). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
37.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge: MIT Press.
38.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (2006). Dynamic system theories. In W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (pp. 258–312). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
39.
Trempala, J. (2011). Natura rozwoju psychicznego [The nature of psychological development]. In J. Trempala (ed.), Psychologia rozwoju człowieka [Psychology of human development] (pp. 28–49). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
40.
Trempala J., & Olejnik M. (2011). Badanie rozwoju psychicznego człowieka [Studying human psychological development]. In J. Trempala (ed.), Psychologia rozwoju człowieka [Psychology of human development] (pp. 127–144). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
41.
van Geert, P. (1997). Variability and fluctuations: A dynamic view. In E. Amsel & K. A. Renninger (eds.), Change and development: Issues of theory, method, and applications (pp. 193–212). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
42.
van Geert, P. (2002). Developmental dynamics, intentional action, and fuzzy sets. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (eds.), Microdevelopment. Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 319–343). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
van der Kamp, L. J. Th., & Bijleveld, C. C. J. (2002). Methodological issues in longitudinal research. In C. C. J. H. Bijleveld, Th. Van der Kamp, A. Mooijaart, W. A. van der Kloot, R. van der Leeden, & E. van der Burg (eds.), Longitudinal data analysis. Designs, models, and methods (pp. 1–45). London: Sage Publications.
44.
Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In D. B. Harris (ed.), The concept of development (pp. 125–147). Minneapolis: University of Mineapolis Press.
45.
Wojciszke, B. (2004). Systematycznie modyfikowane autoreplikacje: logika programu badań empirycznych w psychologii [Systematically modified replications: the logics of the empirical research in psychology]. In J. Brzezinski (ed.), Metodologia badań psychologicznych. Wybór tekstów [Methodology of psychological research. Readings] (pp. 44–68). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.