RESEARCH PAPER
Social perception of sexual harassment
in informal relations
| 1 | Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland |
Submission date: 2021-05-17
Final revision date: 2021-08-27
Acceptance date: 2021-08-28
Online publication date: 2022-02-25
Publication date: 2022-09-30
Current Issues in Personality Psychology 2022;10(3):227–233
KEYWORDS
sexual harassmentattributions of responsibility and punishmentinformal relationshipsgender differencesdefen-sive attribution theory
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Perception of sexual harassment in informal relations is a largely uninvestigated topic. This study aimed to bridge this gap by examining the effect of the type of relationship between the perpetrator and the victim on the perception of harassment. Furthermore, we considered potential factors moderating the tested relationships: acceptance of gender stereotypes and sex.
Participants and procedure:
In total, 369 participants were assigned to one of three conditions including a female victim and a male perpetrator who was either her neighbor, coworker, or supervisor.
Results:
The participants assessed the harasser to be responsible. The supervisor’s behavior was considered more punishable than that of the colleague or neighbor. The male participants reported that the perpetrator was less deserving of punishment than female participants.
Conclusions:
The findings suggest that social norms regarding sexual harassment in formal and informal relationships are similar, excluding harassment by supervisors, which was rated as most punishable.
Perception of sexual harassment in informal relations is a largely uninvestigated topic. This study aimed to bridge this gap by examining the effect of the type of relationship between the perpetrator and the victim on the perception of harassment. Furthermore, we considered potential factors moderating the tested relationships: acceptance of gender stereotypes and sex.
Participants and procedure:
In total, 369 participants were assigned to one of three conditions including a female victim and a male perpetrator who was either her neighbor, coworker, or supervisor.
Results:
The participants assessed the harasser to be responsible. The supervisor’s behavior was considered more punishable than that of the colleague or neighbor. The male participants reported that the perpetrator was less deserving of punishment than female participants.
Conclusions:
The findings suggest that social norms regarding sexual harassment in formal and informal relationships are similar, excluding harassment by supervisors, which was rated as most punishable.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3....
2.
Ashmore, R. D., Del Boca, F. K., & Bilder, S. M. (1995). Construction and validation of the Gender Attitude Inventory, a structured inventory to assess multiple dimensions of gender attitudes. Sex Roles, 32, 753–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0156....
3.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychol-ogy, 42, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/h00362....
4.
EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (EU FRA) (2015). Violence against women: an EU-wide survey – main results. Publications Office of the European Union.
5.
Fidan, F., & Yeşil, Y. (2020). Sexual harassment in the workplace by the occurance and the consequences: a research on women who exposed to sexual harassment. Kadın/Woman 2000 – Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 21, 53–67. https://doi.org/20.500.12619/7....
6.
Fitzgerald, L. F., & Cortina, L. (2018). Sexual harassment in work organizations: a view from the 21st centu-ry. In C. B. Travis, J. W. White, A. Rutherford, W. Williams, & S. Cook (Eds.), APA handbook of the psycholo-gy of women: Perspectives on women’s private and public lives (Vol. 2, pp. 215–234). American Psycholog-ical Association.
7.
Key, C. W., & Ridge, R. D. (2011). Guys like us: The link between sexual harassment proclivity and blame. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 1093–1103. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540....
8.
Lipińska-Grobelny, A., & Gorczycka, K. (2011). Rekonstrukcja narzędzia do pomiaru płci psychologicznej [The reconstruction of a technique to assess psychological gender]. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 54, 179–192.
9.
Lucarini, A., Suitner, C., Brown, R., Craig, M. A., Knowles, E. D., & Casara, B. G. S. (2020). The #MeTooLate Effect: Victim blame and trust denial for sexual harassment not immediately reported. Personality and Individual Differences, 167, 110240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid....
10.
Marin, A. J., & Guadagno, R. E. (1999). Perceptions of sexual harassment victims as a function of labeling and reporting. Sex Roles, 41, 921–940. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018....
11.
McCabe, M. P., & Hardman, L. (2005). Attitudes and perceptions of workers to sexual harassment. The Jour-nal of Social Psychology, 145, 719–740. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.1....
12.
Moor, A. (2010). She dresses to attract, he perceives seduction: a gender gap in attribution of intent to women’s revealing style of dress and its relation to blaming the victims of sexual violence. Journal of In-ternational Women’s Studies, 11, 115–127.
13.
Nabors, E. L., & Jasinski, J. L. (2009). Intimate partner violence perpetration among college students: The role of gender role and gendered violence attitudes. Feminist Criminology, 4, 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/155708....
14.
Nodeland, B., & Craig, J. (2021). Perceptions of legal and extralegal punishments for sexual harassment in the ‘MeToo’ era. Deviant Behavior, 42, 850–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/016396....
15.
O’Connor, K. W., Drouin, M., & Niedermeyer, T. (2021). How do age, sex, political orientation, religiosity, and sexism affect perceptions of sex assault/harassment allegations? Sexuality & Culture, 25, 1605–1619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119....
16.
Pina, A., Gannon, T. A., & Saunders, B. (2009). An overview of the literature on sexual harassment: Perpetra-tor, theory, and treatment issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.....
17.
Rothgerber, H., Kaufling, K., Incorvati, C., Andrew, C. B., & Farmer, A. (2021). Is a reasonable woman differ-ent from a reasonable person? Gender differences in perceived sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 84, 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199....
18.
Rotundo, M., Nguyen, D. H., & Sackett, P. R. (2001). A meta-analytic review of gender differences in percep-tions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 914–922. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9....
19.
Shaver, K. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/h00287....
20.
Shechory Bitton, M., & Shaul, B. D. (2013). Perceptions and attitudes to sexual harassment: an examination of sex differences and the sex composition of the harasser-target dyad. Journal of Applied Social Psycholo-gy, 43, 2136–2145. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.1....
21.
Smirles, K. E. (2004). Attributions of responsibility in cases of sexual harassment: The person and the situa-tion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559....
22.
Wayne, J. H. (2000). Disentangling the power bases of sexual harassment: Comparing gender, age, and posi-tion power. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1....
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.